

Tucker Carlson
Without censorship, the democratic party can’t continue to hold power
Transparency is the antidote to ‘misinformation.’
Well, I wanted to open with a halloween pun, but it’s not funny. Tucker questions the inconsistencies in the reports about the recent attack on Paul Pelosi, and why the mainstream media is attempting to hide what they’ve already said. Highlights include:
“At the first press conference on Friday, San Francisco police suggested there was a third person in the home when police arrived, and Politico dutifully reported that. ‘Officers arrived at the house, knocked on the front door, and were led inside by an unknown person.’…Now, Politico never formally corrected this claim. Instead, just two days later, Politico, the same publication, attacked anyone who reported its own reporting as a crazed conspiracy monger.”
“As long as this is a news story with public policy implications, and unfortunately, that’s what it’s become, it is fair to ask the obvious questions, as you would about any other violent crime that occurs in America, and especially this one, since so many basic facts seem to be in dispute.”
Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: BIBLE: Will America Be Significant in the End Times?
“You can’t blame people watching all of this at home for thinking that maybe there’s something weird going on here. Parts of the official account don’t make any sense, so the solution, obviously, is to release the police bodycam footage from last Friday. That’s often done immediately in cases like this, cases that attract heavy public scrutiny. Transparency restores the public’s faith in the system, it is the only thing that does.”
“Transparency is the antidote to ‘misinformation.’ On the other hand, if you want people to fall head first into crazed conspiracy theories, then you keep lying and hiding things. And yet, for some reason, the San Francisco Police Department is refusing to release Friday’s bodycam video.”
“But, the main question tonight, the one that’s going to affect your life going forward, ‘cuz this story will affect your life, the question is Who exactly is David DePape? Many in the media seem studiously uninterested, they don’t really want to know. At a police press conference last week, a reporter was caught on a hot mic being instructed by someone not to discuss DePape in any great detail. So, it was left in the end, to a journalist who doesn’t work for a big media outlet, independent reporter Michael Shellenberger, to fill in some of the blanks.”
“… the perpetrator in this violent crime against Paul Pelosi is a mentally ill, drug addicted, illegal alien nudist who takes hallucinogens and lives in a hippie school bus in Berkley with a BLM banner and a pride flag out front. So, take those uncontested facts and let them rattle around your brain for a moment until a recognizable pattern emerges. If you guessed this is obviously a textbook case of homegrown rightwing extremism, well then obviously you’ve been watching a lot of cable news today.”
“But the bottom line is, ladies and gentlemen, the mentally ill, homeless illegal alien drug addict who lives in a painted school bus in Berkley with a BLM flag is, actually, despite all appearances, another member of Donald Trump’s q-anon army.”
“What they’re really arguing is, in the wake of this attack, which is awful, against someone who did not deserve it… Unfortunately, you can no longer have free speech. They’re telling you this is an example of ‘stochastic terrorism’, a completely meaningless phrase that emerged like a virus…to infect our public discourse.”
“What they’re telling you is that dissenting in any way from the editorial positions of , say, The Washington Post or The Daily Beast or The Atlantic magazine, disagreeing with those publications and the consensus they represent isn’t simply immoral, no, it’s worse than that, it’s violence. It gets people killed, that’s the ‘stochastic terrorism’.”
“Democrats are very worried about the coming election, but they’re absolutely terrified that Elon Musk may allow people to criticize them on Twitter, and they know what Republicans don’t seem to know, which is, without censorship, the Democratic party cannot continue to hold power. Democrats understand that. They have nothing to offer. They have to stop you from asking questions, so they have to crush Elon Musk, not because he’s a right-winger, but because he will allow their opponents to speak, and of course they are using the attack on poor Paul Pelosi to do just that.”
“But something else is going on here, something beneath even all of that. Obviously, by immediately politicizing the attacks, democrats get a lot, potentially, but the main thing they do is effectively obscure the deepest truth of all, which is that what happened to Paul Pelosi isn’t so unusual anymore. Crime in this country is out of control by every measure.”
Watch the video below and tell us your thoughts in the comments.
We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
Tucker Carlson
Indicting Trump is an abuse of power
Make no mistake, this is a turning point for the country.
Tucker looks at why Donald Trump might possibly be indicted and questions whether that’s even illegal and punishable at this point. Highlights include:
“The dominant rumor on the internet over the weekend was that Donald Trump will soon be indicted, possibly even handcuffed on camera. Is that true? We can’t say. We do know that Trump is the subject of a grand jury investigation in Manhattan, that’s a city that voted against Donald Trump by almost 80% in the last presidential election. We also know that the grand jury was empaneled by a Soros-funded DA called Alvin Bragg.”
“So we would assume on the basis of that evidence that’s it’s pretty likely Trump does get charged with something at some point, but charged with what? That’s the question that should matter. In a free country, laws are universal. Laws apply to all citizens equally precisely because all citizens are considered equal.”
Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: BIBLE: Will America Be Significant in the End Times?
“Eight years ago as he was running for president, Trump paid a porn actress named Stormy Daniels $130,000. Daniels alleged that she and Trump had at one point had sex. Trump denied that, he still denies it. But in exchange for promising not to repeat that claim in public, Trump through his then attorney Michael Cohen, sent Stormy Daniels a check. Was that legal?.”
“Because there was a campaign in progress at the time, officials at the Federal Election Commission later examined the transaction between Trump and Stormy Daniels. Federal investigators concluded that nothing criminal had taken place, and in fact, settlements like this, whatever you think of them, are common, both among famous people, ‘celebrities’ and in corporate America. The result is usually known as a NDA, a non-disclosure agreement.”
“It didn’t really answer the question. Why are we handcuffing Donald Trump? Liberals don’t seem to care at all as long as it happens, as long as Trump gets handcuffed. But, in fact there’s plenty of evidence that Trump committed no crime in sending money to Stormy Daniels.”
“We don’t have to guess. Consider the case of former North Carolina senator John Edwards. Long after Edwards left office, Barak Obama’s DOJ charged him with federal finance violations. So, the premise of the case against John Edwards was that he had received $1 million in gifts and that he spent that money in ‘hush money’ payments to his mistress with whom he later had a child. Obama’s DOJ argued that the money Edwards sent to his girlfriend amounted to ‘campaign contributions.’ Edwards never reported that money, so Obama’s DOJ tried to send him to prison.”
“Well, in the end, the case fell apart under the weight of its own incoherence. So, Obama’s lawyers argued that any payment that could conceivably help a political candidate politically is by definition a campaign expenditure. There’s no law that says that, by the way, they just made it up. But if you think about it for a second, it doesn’t make sense. If that were true, flip it around. It would mean that candidates could use donor money and also taxpayer money in the form of federal matching funds to pay for any personal expense as long as that expense could conceivably benefit them politically.”
“Not surprisingly, John Edwards was acquitted in that case.”
“What’s interesting is even as Bragg has been single-mindedly focused on Donald Trump and his ‘crimes,’ sending money to a porn star, he has been not only ignoring real crimes, but downgrading felonies to misdemeanors and letting actual violent criminals out of jail as quickly as possible. On his first day in office, first day, Bragg, consistent with the ideas of the man who paid for his campaign, George Soros, issued a memo explaining his office will ‘not seek a corsarial sentence except in cases involving homicides, economic crimes, and a small number of felonies.’”
“Bragg seems to be alleging that Trump violated New York’s Business Record Act by falsely reporting the payout to Stormy Daniels as ‘legal fees.’ Now, if this were true, it would constitute a misdemeanor and the statute of limitations has already run out for that, for the bookkeeping error, assuming it even happened. But Bragg apparently is thinking about charging Trump under a felony version of the Business Records Law, one that punishes businesses for falsifying records as a way to commit another separate crime. That would be the campaign finance violation, which as we mentioned, was not a campaign finance violation, and we know that from the FEC, which policies campaign finance violations. By the way, if it were, that would be a federal crime, not something that Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan DA would be prosecuting.”
“Make no mistake, this is a turning point for the country. Now, the headline here is not that they’re being unfair to Donald Trump again, though of course they are, or even that Trump is the former president of the United States. Who cares? Though, as long as we are indicting retired presidents, where are the charges against George W Bush for invading Iraq under false pretenses and giving permanent normalized trade relations to China, which completely wrecked our economy?”
“What happens if they get away with this? If they use the Justice Department, in full view of everyone, to settle a political score and to keep the White House, just to take a guy out of the race who seems to be doing fairly well? We’ll destroy the justice system, and that’s not a small thing. A functioning justice system has kept this country peaceful for hundreds of years. The purpose of a justice system is to administer justice so that citizens don’t have to do it themselves, you outsource that duty to the government. But what happens when you take that away, when there is no justice system?”
Watch the video below and give us your thoughts in the comments:
Tucker Carlson
Zelenskyy is demanding you send your kids to war
Zelenskyy is on television almost every day demanding that you send your children to war, really, where they could die.
Tucker continues his coverage of your government actively trying to drag us into a war with Russia and China, allegedly to defend a democracy that isn’t a democracy, who refuse to account for the several billions worth of money and equipment they’ve received over the past year.
Highlights include:
“Well, it looks like you’re gonna get a hot war with Russia and China whether you want one or not. Yesterday morning, and American reaper drone went down over the Black Sea. We still do not know exactly what happened.”
Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: BIBLE: Will America Be Significant in the End Times?
“We don’t expect to find out anytime soon, if ever. The Biden administration says it knows, it says the unmanned drone was harassed and damaged by two Russian fighter jets over international waters. It’s all we have, we’re going to have to take their word for it, everybody else seems to be. Lindsay Graham didn’t ask many penetrating questions, no, he moved immediately, seized the opportunity to demand that the Pentagon attack the Russian air force.”
“What would Ronald Reagan do? Oo, good question, Senator Graham. Ronald Reagan’s two term presidency was notable for the fact that he did not declare war on the Russian air force, and therefore the United States did not go to war with Russia and millions of lives were saved as a result, that’s not a small thing. Put one in the Reagan win column there. Another president they told you is a crazed warmonger who actually kept us out of war but won the cold war anyway. And how did Reagan do that? Well, simple. He kept the American economy strong.”
“The Republican presidential nominee, almost no matter who it is, will oppose an open-ended commitment to fund the war in Ukraine in order to fight Russia forever. Now, their position is, in fact, fully in line with the overwhelming majority of conservative voters, the ones who choose the Republican nominee, but those voters have been utterly disenfranchised for the past year as Lindsay Graham and the Atlantic magazine and the ghost of Ronald Reagan have been permitted to speak for them in bad faith. But it’s not just conservative voters who don’t want war with Russia, it’s the majority of all voters, and now there are people running for office who agree with voters, as in a democracy.”
“We’ve sent a huge amount of material to Ukraine, artillery, ammunition, $100billion, so that would suggest that the Ukrainian military has a lot of equipment, they’re well armed. But no, at the very same time that Mark Milley’s telling us that, the Pentagon just yesterday informed us that, actually, Ukraine is running out of munitions.”
“So, we’ve spent more than Russia’s typical annual military budget in Ukraine, and yet the Ukrainian military is out of ammunition again? Okay, that might be a question for Zelenskyy, Where’s all the money going?”
“These hair hats on television scolding the American Speaker of the House because he won’t suck up to a corrupt foreign leader who’s demanding that you send your children to war in a country you can’t find on a map? Zelenskyy is on television almost every day demanding that you send your children to war, really, where they could die. Now, typically, people who demand that you put your children in a position where they could die are not your allies.”
Watch the video below and give us your thoughts in the comments:
-
Faith2 weeks ago
Would God Write This Letter to American Christians?
-
Elections2 weeks ago
DANGER: What Happens When the People No Longer Believe in Their Government
-
Business2 weeks ago
Top Five Online Scams to Avoid
-
Faith7 days ago
What Does AI Say About the Resurrection of Jesus
-
Elections2 weeks ago
Internal Destroyers Occupying the White House
-
Elections1 week ago
Jimmy Kimmel, Oscar Host, Leftist Idiot, and J6 Liar
-
money1 week ago
The Two Little Known Columbia Professors Who Planned the Collapse of America in 1966
-
Faith6 days ago
Sex Before Marriage? Secular Research Shows You Should Wait