Tucker Carlson
Without censorship, the democratic party can’t continue to hold power
Transparency is the antidote to ‘misinformation.’
Well, I wanted to open with a halloween pun, but it’s not funny. Tucker questions the inconsistencies in the reports about the recent attack on Paul Pelosi, and why the mainstream media is attempting to hide what they’ve already said. Highlights include:
“At the first press conference on Friday, San Francisco police suggested there was a third person in the home when police arrived, and Politico dutifully reported that. ‘Officers arrived at the house, knocked on the front door, and were led inside by an unknown person.’…Now, Politico never formally corrected this claim. Instead, just two days later, Politico, the same publication, attacked anyone who reported its own reporting as a crazed conspiracy monger.”
“As long as this is a news story with public policy implications, and unfortunately, that’s what it’s become, it is fair to ask the obvious questions, as you would about any other violent crime that occurs in America, and especially this one, since so many basic facts seem to be in dispute.”
“You can’t blame people watching all of this at home for thinking that maybe there’s something weird going on here. Parts of the official account don’t make any sense, so the solution, obviously, is to release the police bodycam footage from last Friday. That’s often done immediately in cases like this, cases that attract heavy public scrutiny. Transparency restores the public’s faith in the system, it is the only thing that does.”
“Transparency is the antidote to ‘misinformation.’ On the other hand, if you want people to fall head first into crazed conspiracy theories, then you keep lying and hiding things. And yet, for some reason, the San Francisco Police Department is refusing to release Friday’s bodycam video.”
“But, the main question tonight, the one that’s going to affect your life going forward, ‘cuz this story will affect your life, the question is Who exactly is David DePape? Many in the media seem studiously uninterested, they don’t really want to know. At a police press conference last week, a reporter was caught on a hot mic being instructed by someone not to discuss DePape in any great detail. So, it was left in the end, to a journalist who doesn’t work for a big media outlet, independent reporter Michael Shellenberger, to fill in some of the blanks.”
“… the perpetrator in this violent crime against Paul Pelosi is a mentally ill, drug addicted, illegal alien nudist who takes hallucinogens and lives in a hippie school bus in Berkley with a BLM banner and a pride flag out front. So, take those uncontested facts and let them rattle around your brain for a moment until a recognizable pattern emerges. If you guessed this is obviously a textbook case of homegrown rightwing extremism, well then obviously you’ve been watching a lot of cable news today.”
“But the bottom line is, ladies and gentlemen, the mentally ill, homeless illegal alien drug addict who lives in a painted school bus in Berkley with a BLM flag is, actually, despite all appearances, another member of Donald Trump’s q-anon army.”
“What they’re really arguing is, in the wake of this attack, which is awful, against someone who did not deserve it… Unfortunately, you can no longer have free speech. They’re telling you this is an example of ‘stochastic terrorism’, a completely meaningless phrase that emerged like a virus…to infect our public discourse.”
“What they’re telling you is that dissenting in any way from the editorial positions of , say, The Washington Post or The Daily Beast or The Atlantic magazine, disagreeing with those publications and the consensus they represent isn’t simply immoral, no, it’s worse than that, it’s violence. It gets people killed, that’s the ‘stochastic terrorism’.”
“Democrats are very worried about the coming election, but they’re absolutely terrified that Elon Musk may allow people to criticize them on Twitter, and they know what Republicans don’t seem to know, which is, without censorship, the Democratic party cannot continue to hold power. Democrats understand that. They have nothing to offer. They have to stop you from asking questions, so they have to crush Elon Musk, not because he’s a right-winger, but because he will allow their opponents to speak, and of course they are using the attack on poor Paul Pelosi to do just that.”
“But something else is going on here, something beneath even all of that. Obviously, by immediately politicizing the attacks, democrats get a lot, potentially, but the main thing they do is effectively obscure the deepest truth of all, which is that what happened to Paul Pelosi isn’t so unusual anymore. Crime in this country is out of control by every measure.”
Watch the video below and tell us your thoughts in the comments.
We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
Tucker Carlson
Tucker: Ep. 73 The Vladimir Putin Interview
Our goal is to stop this war, and we did not start this war in 2022. This is an attempt to stop it.
The interview that’s had most of your “legacy media’s” panties in a twist all week has finally happened.
I don’t remember anyone making a fuss when Dan Rather interviewed Saddam Hussein, just sayin’.
Tucker Carlson gets Vladimir Putin’s take on, among other things, the current situation in Ukraine, how it started and possible resolutions, Russia’s relationship with China,the world economy, and a look into the future. Highlights include:
“After 1991 when Russia expected that it would be welcomed into the brotherly family of civilized nations, nothing like this happened. You tricked us. I don’t mean you personally when I say you. Of course I’m talking about the United States. The promise was that NATO would not expand eastward. But it happened five times. There were five waves of expansion. We tolerated all that. We were trying to persuade them. We were saying, please don’t. We are as bourgeois now as you are. We are a market economy and there is no communist party power, let’s negotiate.
“The events in the Middle East, in Iraq, we were building relations with the United States in a very soft, prudent, cautious manner. I repeatedly raised the issue that the United States should not support separatism or terrorism in the North Caucasus, but they continued to do it anyway. And political support, information support, financial support, even military support came from the United States and its satellites for terrorist groups in the Caucasus. I once raised this issue with my colleague, also the president of the United States. He says it’s impossible, do you have proof? I said yes, I was prepared for this conversation, and I gave him that proof. He looked at it, and you know what he said? I apologize, but that’s what happened. I’ll quote, “Well, I’m gonna kick their ass.” We waited and waited for some response…The CIA replied, “We have been working with the opposition in Russia. We believe that this is the thing to do and we will on doing it.”
“…In 2008, the doors of NATO were opened for Ukraine. In 2014, there was a coup. They started persecuting those who did not accept the coup, and it was indeed a coup. They created a threat to Crimea, which we had to take under our protection. They launched the war in Donbas in 2014 with the use of aircraft and artillery against civilians. This is when it all started… They launched a large scale military operation, then another one. When they failed, they started to prepare the next one. All this against the background of military development of this territory and opening of NATO’s doors. How could we not express concern over what was happening?”
“Our goal is to stop this war, and we did not start this war in 2022. This is an attempt to stop it… No, we haven’t achieved our aims yet because one of them is de-nazification. This means the prohibition of all kinds of neo-Nazi movements. This is one of the problems that we discussed during the negotiation process, which ended in Istanbul early this year…and it was not our initiative, because we were told, by the Europeans in particular, that it was necessary to create conditions for the final signing of the documents.”
“Further on, the president of Ukraine issued a decree prohibiting negotiations with us. Let him cancel that decree, and that’s it. We have never refused negotiations, indeed. We hear all the time, is Russia ready? Yes. We have not refused. It was them who publicly refused. Well, let him cancel his decree and enter into negotiations. We have never refused.”
Check out the interview for yourself and give us your thoughts in the comments.
Ep. 73 The Vladimir Putin Interview pic.twitter.com/67YuZRkfLL
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 8, 2024
Tucker Carlson
Tucker: Fossil Fuels in Space?
The IPCC and all these so-called scientists from NASA, NOAA, and all of them are not doing their due diligence.
If fossil fuels come from fossils, why is there oil and natural gas on other planets? Tucker interviews Dr. Willie Soon on the climate, sun activity, and the current state of science. Highlights include:
“In the United States, we often refer to our main sources of energy as ‘fossil fuels’. Oil, natural gas, coal, they’re ‘fossil fuels’ because they come form fossils, ancient organic material, forests, jungles, plankton, dinosaurs. Held under the ground for millennia, they transform into oil, gas and coal. Everybody thinks that’s true. On the other hand, there’s evidence that maybe it’s not the whole story. If that’s where fossil fuels come from, if that’s how hydrocarbons are made, then how come they’re found so deep under the oceans and at the top of the Earth? How come one of Saturn’s moons, according to scientists, has more oil and natural gas than Earth? Were there dinosaurs and planktons and forests at one point on one of Saturn’s moons? Probably not. So, if all hydrocarbons aren’t from fossils, where are they from and why isn’t this commonly known, and what are the implications of it, and what does it tell us about our modern climate change policy?”
“It’s the sun, actually, that does a lot of this. The glacial, like, this period called Little Ice Age from about 1300 to 1900, you know, very cool, and then there’s a bit of a warm period from 880 to about 1200, you know, it was warm. I mean, you can grow wine in England, right? And now you cannot grow wine, right? /Things like that. I mean, Greenland was green back then, but now it’s full of glaciers, ice is coming in, so what are you talking about exactly?”
“There’s another effect that is very, very important. It’s basically because the sun, the earth is forced to go around the sun, and then the orbit changes ever so slightly because of perturbation from all the other planets… Jupiter, Saturn, and even Venus, and Mars, they are actually controlling what we do. And the moon as well is very important. But that other factors [sic], the orbits plus the changes of the sun by itself, between how bright, how dim it is. These two factors can explain just about everything that we know.”
“This year, just two months ago, we published two more papers, convincingly show that even the thermometer data that they show you is not what it is. It’s actually not measuring ‘climate’, it’s measuring urban heat and island changes…If you go to the inner part of the big city…You go to inner cities, much warmer than outside because of concrete retaining all the heat, or you change all the surfaces, the surface becomes impervious, which means there’s no breathing, no water going in and out… What we show is that it’s not a phenomenon just on local signs. You average over this, you can see the effect all over the northern hemisphere.. And they tell you this is global temperature.”
“The IPCC and all these so-called scientists from NASA, NOAA, and all of them are not doing their due diligence. They are putting you…very bad quality data products. Not only that, they hide it. Some of them it’s so difficult to get the data.”
You can find the links below and leave us your thoughts in the comments:
Ep. 62 If fossil fuels come from fossils, why have scientists found them on one of Saturn’s moons? A lot of what you’ve heard about energy is false. Dr. Willie Soon explains.
TIMESTAMPS
(01:49) Fossil Fuels in Space
(14:27) Global Warming Throughout History
(25:31) Outside… pic.twitter.com/GMaDkDl8z9— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) January 9, 2024
America No More…
Biden wants to tie Israel’s hands
Prepare for the Worst: Domestic Sabotage and Violence on the Horizon
America’s Unjust Justice System
With Representatives Like Kelly Daughtry, We Can Take Back America
Why East Coast Workers are Blurry Eyed on Monday Morning
The Rise of Mark Robinson and the Benefit to North Carolina
