Tucker: What is going on here? ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Tucker Carlson

Tucker: What is going on here?

Is the justice department bothered by this? No, of course not. You know what bothers the justice department quite a bit? Defying the democratic party.

Published

on

It’s ya’ boy, Big Al Ruggerbot 2.0, back from vacation with this week’s Carlson of Tuckers.

Tucker questions why our “Department of Justice” is arresting innocent old men for doing nothing wrong because of how they voted while perjurers, murderers and actual terrorists are rewarded. Highlights include:

“This is not the way civilized countries operate. Just because you control the White House and both houses of Congress does not mean you get to throw your political opponents behind bars.”

“That’s not what we do in America, that’s what they do in Haiti, but that’s what we’re doing now, and Peter Navarro’s not the first.”

“Biden’s justice department also arrested Trump advisor Steve Bannon for a similar fake crime. Steve Bannon is awaiting trial this summer. So, this is not something we’ve seen before, it’s a huge step toward the politics of the Third World.”

“But, the media whose job you thought it was to push back against power are not. They’re in fact, applauding because it turns out no punishment is too severe for those who disagree with the national news media.”

“So, they really are your enemies. They’re not covering the news, they’re plotting ways to hurt you. That’s true.”

“‘Congressional subpoenas are not optional!,’ they lecture you. Comply with them or go to jail, that’s the message the ‘lawyers’ on television are sending. So, let’s pretend for a moment that that was true, though it’s in fact not true. If there was, in fact, a law like that, for that law to be legitimate it would have to be, like all laws, applied equally across the board, and no less than the Attorney General himself has said that again and again and again.”

“If somebody asserts executive privilege, at the very least Congress doesn’t get to arrest them. Before anyone is arrested, they have to go to a judge to rule on whether or not executive privilege is valid in this case, and that’s exactly what happened in Eric Holder’s case.”

“And by the way, the federal judge rejected Eric Holder’s executive privilege claim and still he was not arrested. Why? You know why. Because he’s a leading democrat.”

“But in Peter Navarro’s case, Merrick Garland’s DOJ did not even bother to ask a judge. They just arrested Peter Navarro at National Airport. So, what we’re seeing here isn’t really about Peter Navarro or Steve Bannon. What we’re seeing is a massive escalation in the use by the democratic party of our justice system for partisan revenge.”

“Is the justice department bothered by this? No, of course not. You know what bothers the justice department quite a bit? Defying the democratic party. Do that and your house gets raided by a SWAT team that tips off CNN before it happens. Roger Stone discovered that the hard way.”

“Nothing destroys the legitimacy of our institutions more than politicized law enforcement. You can’t have that. Justice must be blind. If there is a single institution we have to preserve for the sake of our children and grandchildren, it’s our justice system and the law enforcement agencies that serve it. They can’t be corrupt. If they’re corrupt, it’s going to be pretty hard to live here.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments. Actually, better not, BB’s gonna’ getcha.’

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Tucker Carlson

Tucker: This is a manufactured disaster

They’re hoping that if they keep screaming at you, you will be too bewildered and off-balance to notice what is happening to the country around you, much less able to fight back against it.

Published

on

Tucker continues his coverage of how everything is going according to plan … for soulless government and corporations looking to distract us from recognizing the disasters they’ve caused. Highlights include:

“The problem is definitely not our resources. Our resources in the United States are abundant. The problem is our leaders. The things you need are too expensive to buy because politicians created inflation, and they did it for a simple reason. They’ve racked up so much debt buying votes and enriching themselves and their families, that they had no choice but to weaken the US dollar in order to make the payments on the loans they took out.”

“It’s that simple.”

“And then once inflation arrived, ideologues in the Biden administration immediately understood how it could be used. So, since you can no longer afford to drive your car, you will have no choice but to accept their ‘green energy’ scams, and that means their donors who run those scams will get richer and they will get control over the US economy. So, everyone wins, except you. It’s perfect. None of it happened by accident, this is a manufactured disaster.”

“They seem afraid because they are afraid. To them, a crowd of angry people at the Capitol looks a lot like a foretaste of things to come. That’s exactly why they’re so desperate to take your guns away. It’s why they’re screaming at you about ‘trans rights’ and ‘systemic racism’ and the all-encompassing evil of the president of faraway Russia.”

“What does any of that have to do with our actual problems here and improving your life? Well, none of it has anything to do with improving your life, and that’s the point. They’re hoping that if they keep screaming at you, you will be too bewildered and off-balance to notice what is happening to the country around you, much less able to fight back against it. And just to make sure you’re too bewildered to act, as they scream they shift the blame from themselves to you. So they’re now pronouncing you guilty for the crimes that they’ve committed. You’ve watched this happen.”

“So it turns out many economists and ‘social scientists’ have concluded that having kids is selfish and way too expensive and that’s your fault, so dial back your expectations of ever having a family. Thanks for telling us, MSNBC.”

“Notice that no one at MSNBC ever blames the powerful for where we are. Apparently, the US government had no role in ‘reducing the labor force participation rate,’ say by shutting down the entire US economy and firing anyone who didn’t get their vax or turning cities in to war zones or devaluing the US dollar. None of that actually happened, it’s not their fault. Wall Street and the fed are blameless. The problem is you. The problem is that you selfishly want to have children and children are bad for GDP. All the big corporations now agree on that, they’re all now against human reproduction.”

“Yep, very damaging to the economy, having all those children, all that new life. This is the America that Janet Yellen has created with the help of her friends in the media. So, you can’t afford to get married or buy a house or have children, much less raise them yourself in a two parent family on a single income as every generation of Americans did for hundreds of years in this country. But for you, none of that is possible. Only private equity people can afford normal families now. But for you, things are very different. For you life is low-paid drone work at some digital country, punctuated only by brunch on the weekends and Netflix and white whine at night forever until you die alone with no descendants to remember you.”

“Why are they telling you this? Well, simple. The more atomized and unhappy American society becomes, the easier it is for them to control. Fewer marriages and babies and family-owned homes means more rootless and dissatisfied people. It means an entire nation of desperately unhappy grad students.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

Continue Reading

Tucker Carlson

Tucker: This is a coordinated attack on the family

It’s not simply an explicit attack on the legitimacy of the third branch of government, the Court. It’s not just an attack on the right of people to govern themselves. It’s something bigger than that.

Published

on

Tucker calls the enraged response to Roe v Wade ending what it is, an attack on the institution of Family. Highlights include:

“’I do not view abortion as a choice,’ said Joe Biden as recently as 2006, ‘I think it’s always a tragedy.’ And, of course it always is a tragedy, even if you believe it should be legal, and democrats once said this out loud forthrightly. In fact, in 1997 as White House council, now Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan urged her boss Bill Clinton to sign a ban on partial birth abortions. Elena Kagan has always been pro-choice, but ending the life of a child the week before birth was too much even for her, and of course for his part, Bill Clinton never spoke about abortion as anything but as a last resort. He famously described it as something that should be ‘safe, legal and rare.’ You don’t hear that on the left anymore, ever.”

“The hysteria is telling. It’s not the assault on bodily autonomy of the end of Roe vs. Wade. Those are the same people who demanded vaccine mandates. But this happened all over the country. In Arizona, thousands of enraged rioters tried to storm the state capitol. On Friday night they tore down security fencing around the building. They pounded on the senate’s glass doors and windows while the legislature was in session, police had to fire tear gas from the windows to protect the politicians inside.”

“Looks like insurrection to us, but no arrests were made at the Arizona state capitol on Friday when that footage was shot, there will be no FBI investigation. Democrats who called January 6 a racist insurrection said nothing this weekend about the violent siege at the state capitol of Arizona. Did you expect them to? No, of course not. In fact, instead, they justified it.”

“Because the Court did something they don’t like, they’re now telling us the third branch of government is ‘illegitimate’. The Supreme Court is ‘illegitimate’ because it’s allowing voters to decide what they want to do with abortion. Some would call that democracy, a system in which citizens choose their own form of government. They’re telling us it’s illegitimate.”

“It’s not simply an explicit attack on the legitimacy of the third branch of government, the Court. It’s not just an attack on the right of people to govern themselves. It’s something bigger than that. What you’re seeing is a coordinated attack on the family and on children. People at these protests are angered at the idea that children are being born. Watch what’s happening there, that’s hardly an overstatement.”

“What about the thought of having children makes these people so angry? Where does an attitude like that come from? Well, as it turns out, that attitude comes from the same place the democratic party now gets all of its attitudes, directly from corporate America. Corporate America wants you childless, and this is a big change.”

“A hundred years ago, big companies built housing for the families of their employees and then schools and libraries to educate them. It was the humane thing to do, but it also seemed to make good business sense at the time. If you wanted workers you could count on, you had to take care of them and their offspring. But over time, that arrangement got expensive. Employees with families demanded higher wages to support their children, and in many cases they formed unions to get those raises, so labor costs soared. So corporate America in response to this developed a new model: hire single women.”

“The one downside to hiring young women is they can get pregnant. If you’re running the HR department at Citibank, that is the last thing you want. Children make your health care plan more expensive.”

“What amazing is that in the face of this, so many Americans who ought to know better have fallen for it. So, some accountant at a soulless publicly traded corporation concludes that drones with no personal lives make cheaper workers, that’s what happened. But rather than question this or resist it, your average college-educated NPR listener nods in vigorous bovine agreement, and then becomes completely hysterical when someone suggests that maybe there’s another way to live, that it’s at least theoretically possible that raising your own children might be more rewarding as a life choice than commuting into a slum on public education in order to claw your way up into middle management.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments:

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending