Tucker: What is going on here? ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Tucker Carlson

Tucker: What is going on here?

Is the justice department bothered by this? No, of course not. You know what bothers the justice department quite a bit? Defying the democratic party.

Published

on

It’s ya’ boy, Big Al Ruggerbot 2.0, back from vacation with this week’s Carlson of Tuckers.

Tucker questions why our “Department of Justice” is arresting innocent old men for doing nothing wrong because of how they voted while perjurers, murderers and actual terrorists are rewarded. Highlights include:

“This is not the way civilized countries operate. Just because you control the White House and both houses of Congress does not mean you get to throw your political opponents behind bars.”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: The New Democratic Sex Cult

“That’s not what we do in America, that’s what they do in Haiti, but that’s what we’re doing now, and Peter Navarro’s not the first.”

“Biden’s justice department also arrested Trump advisor Steve Bannon for a similar fake crime. Steve Bannon is awaiting trial this summer. So, this is not something we’ve seen before, it’s a huge step toward the politics of the Third World.”

“But, the media whose job you thought it was to push back against power are not. They’re in fact, applauding because it turns out no punishment is too severe for those who disagree with the national news media.”

“So, they really are your enemies. They’re not covering the news, they’re plotting ways to hurt you. That’s true.”

“‘Congressional subpoenas are not optional!,’ they lecture you. Comply with them or go to jail, that’s the message the ‘lawyers’ on television are sending. So, let’s pretend for a moment that that was true, though it’s in fact not true. If there was, in fact, a law like that, for that law to be legitimate it would have to be, like all laws, applied equally across the board, and no less than the Attorney General himself has said that again and again and again.”

“If somebody asserts executive privilege, at the very least Congress doesn’t get to arrest them. Before anyone is arrested, they have to go to a judge to rule on whether or not executive privilege is valid in this case, and that’s exactly what happened in Eric Holder’s case.”

“And by the way, the federal judge rejected Eric Holder’s executive privilege claim and still he was not arrested. Why? You know why. Because he’s a leading democrat.”

“But in Peter Navarro’s case, Merrick Garland’s DOJ did not even bother to ask a judge. They just arrested Peter Navarro at National Airport. So, what we’re seeing here isn’t really about Peter Navarro or Steve Bannon. What we’re seeing is a massive escalation in the use by the democratic party of our justice system for partisan revenge.”

“Is the justice department bothered by this? No, of course not. You know what bothers the justice department quite a bit? Defying the democratic party. Do that and your house gets raided by a SWAT team that tips off CNN before it happens. Roger Stone discovered that the hard way.”

“Nothing destroys the legitimacy of our institutions more than politicized law enforcement. You can’t have that. Justice must be blind. If there is a single institution we have to preserve for the sake of our children and grandchildren, it’s our justice system and the law enforcement agencies that serve it. They can’t be corrupt. If they’re corrupt, it’s going to be pretty hard to live here.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments. Actually, better not, BB’s gonna’ getcha.’

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Tucker Carlson

Martha’s Vineyard Hypocrisy

The ones who claim to be the ‘best people’ are actually the worst people.

Published

on

Tucker’s coverage of the recent visit some Venezuelans made to Martha’s Vineyard continues. Highlights include:

“Those brief hours our Venezuelan brothers and sisters spent on Martha’s Vineyard changed history and left what they’re calling ‘an indelible mark’ on the people who lived there. ‘They enriched us,’ said one resident, ‘we were happy to help them on their journey.’ Unfortunately, as it turned out, that journey ended abruptly at a military base on Cape Cod where our Venezuelan brothers and sisters are being held against their will.”

“The people of Martha’s Vineyard knew this was going to happen, and yet none of them thought to tell their Venezuelan brothers and sisters before it happened.”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: The New Democratic Sex Cult

“Fifty brown people was too many for the people of Martha’s Vineyard. They called in the army to have them removed, like trash, as one island resident said. So actually, judging by their behavior and not simply by their lawn signs, which is the best way to judge people, the people of Martha’s Vineyard are not especially compassionate. In fact, they’re small-minded, and cheap, and pretty nasty, as any waiter or babysitter who works on the island can tell you. So, once again, the ones who claim to be the ‘best people’ are actually the worst people.”

“Actually, the people of Martha’s Vineyard, the residents there are the ones who did the tricking. They tricked the Venezuelans into going to a military base. But that wasn’t deception, no. According to Elizabeth Warren it was an act of love.”

Watch the video below and give us some love in the comments.

Continue Reading

Tucker Carlson

Obama’s DOJ allows record crime in Chicago

George Soros backed a prosecutor named Kim Fox who turned Chicago over to the most vicious people who live there.

Published

on

Tucker takes a look at how even the good neighborhoods in Chicago became gang run dystopias. Highlights include:

“Imagine dystopia. You hear that word frequently, what does it mean? Picture it in your mind’s eye. Dystopia is a world where the police will not protect you. They refuse.”

“And at the same time, you are not allowed to protect yourself.”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: The New Democratic Sex Cult

“So, who does that leave in charge? Who runs a world like that? Well, young men with guns. They’re in charge, the cruelest, most violent element of any society, the people with the least to lose. People like that have all the power. You have no power, and that means that everything you have is theirs.”

“According to reporting by CWB Chicago, just minutes after Ryan King was threatened with death for daring to walk outside in his own neighborhood, Chicago police spotted the gunmen’s vehicle, but there was nothing they could do about it.”

“Their supervisor ordered them not to pursue it, so the criminals just drove off, and of course they committed more violent crimes.”

“Police believe at least two organized armed gangs are now operating with impunity around Bucktown, which means the gangs are in charge now. That’s what the collapse of civilization looks like.”

“So, how did this happen? Well, it’s no mystery. There are many threads. But George Soros is a big one. Soros paid for this to happen. Soros backed a prosecutor named Kim Fox who turned Chicago over to the most vicious people who live there.”

“She’s not the only person who did this, the federal government also played a role. Over the eight years of the Barak Obama administration, the Department of Justice forced more than a dozen police departments around the country to enter into something called ‘dissent decrees.’ Chicago was one of them.”

“Now, all of these decrees took the same form. They pronounce police departments guilty of racism if those departments disproportionally interact with African Americans, regardless of whether those interactions were legally justified. In other words, the law is entirely irrelevaNt to the dissent decree, and so is reality itself.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending