Tucker: This is an obvious lie ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Tucker Carlson

Tucker: This is an obvious lie

Joe Biden himself was making money from this, from CEFC. Lots of money.

Published

on

Tucker investigates the latest on Hunter Biden’s laptop. The government and media aren’t trying to hide it just because it would be embarrassing. Highlights include:

“If you’re the Chinese government, this is the master stroke. This is the checkmate. Once you control a country’s energy grid, you control that country.”

“And you would know that because you didn’t go to Yale Law School and you know something about reality as a result.”

“And, by the way, if you were watching all of this from Beijing, you would find it especially amusing to have the president of the United States sell you his country’s strategic petroleum reserve even as he declared oil and gas off-limits to his own population. If you could pull that off, you would know you were entirely in charge of the US government, you could make Joe Biden do anything. But, of course you already knew that, ‘cuz you’ve seen it in action. When American forces left Afghanistan, Joe Biden turned over Afghanistan’s entire mineral wealth, which is vast, to the Chinese government.”

“It’s all pretty amazing when you think about it, when you put it in context. Whatever helps the Chinese government, Joe Biden has dutifully done. Whatever hurts America’s most important strategic interests he has also done. But why has he done this? How did the Chinese government wind up with so much control over the United States’ president, over Joe Biden’s behavior?”

“Why would Joe Biden have any interest in this? Why would he be concerned about a New York Times story on CEFC and Hunter Biden? Well, it could be for the obvious reason. Joe Biden himself was making money from this, from CEFC. Lots of money. According to emails obtained by the New York Post from Hunter Biden’s laptop in October 2020…One of Hunter Biden’s business partners … explained that Joe Biden would receive a 10% stake in CEFC…This arrangement meant millions of Chinese dollars for Hunter and Joe Biden.”

“Operating on the theory, which isn’t really a theory, it’s true, that they always accuse you of exactly what they themselves are doing, it’s kind of striking that the truth about what the Biden family, the president, his son and his brother, Jimmy, is almost exactly what they accused the Trumps of doing. Except, in the case of the Bidens, they really were getting rich from a foreign power that means us harm. And it’s not Russia, which is globally almost irrelevant. It’s China, which is now preeminent.”

“Emails unearthed by the New York Post found that someone called ‘the chairman’ … promised to pay Hunter Biden $10million/year for ‘introductions alone’, in other words, leveraging his father’s position in government to get rich. That’s illegal, right? It’s also a violation of the FERA Act, which the Biden administration has been enforcing against its political enemies.”

“It’s a lie so obvious that even the Washington Post, which has carried water for Biden from the beginning, had to correct it. ‘Over the course of 14 months, the Chinese energy conglomerate (CEFC) and is executives paid $4.8million to entities controlled by Hunter Biden and his uncle…’ And it’s not just CEFC that funded by Bidens. In all, Hunter Biden made more than $30million from entities affiliated with China’s communist government.”

“Now, we know about most of this because of reporting from Hunter Biden’s laptop, which now everyone admits is authentic. But for more than a year, you were not allowed to talk about this story, and now maybe you understand why. It wasn’t protecting the feelings of Hunter Biden’s family or making fun of his drug addiction … yeah, whatever. It was about China, and that’s why the media portrayed it, at the time, as a conspiracy theory.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Tucker Carlson

Tucker: Ep. 73 The Vladimir Putin Interview

Our goal is to stop this war, and we did not start this war in 2022. This is an attempt to stop it.

Published

on

The interview that’s had most of your “legacy media’s” panties in a twist all week has finally happened.

I don’t remember anyone making a fuss when Dan Rather interviewed Saddam Hussein, just sayin’.

Tucker Carlson gets Vladimir Putin’s take on, among other things, the current situation in Ukraine, how it started and possible resolutions, Russia’s relationship with China,the world economy, and a look into the future. Highlights include:

“After 1991 when Russia expected that it would be welcomed into the brotherly family of civilized nations, nothing like this happened. You tricked us. I don’t mean you personally when I say you. Of course I’m talking about the United States. The promise was that NATO would not expand eastward. But it happened five times. There were five waves of expansion. We tolerated all that. We were trying to persuade them. We were saying, please don’t. We are as bourgeois now as you are. We are a market economy and there is no communist party power, let’s negotiate.

“The events in the Middle East, in Iraq, we were building relations with the United States in a very soft, prudent, cautious manner. I repeatedly raised the issue that the United States should not support separatism or terrorism in the North Caucasus, but they continued to do it anyway. And political support, information support, financial support, even military support came from the United States and its satellites for terrorist groups in the Caucasus. I once raised this issue with my colleague, also the president of the United States. He says it’s impossible, do you have proof? I said yes, I was prepared for this conversation, and I gave him that proof. He looked at it, and you know what he said? I apologize, but that’s what happened. I’ll quote, “Well, I’m gonna kick their ass.” We waited and waited for some response…The CIA replied, “We have been working with the opposition in Russia. We believe that this is the thing to do and we will on doing it.”

“…In 2008, the doors of NATO were opened for Ukraine. In 2014, there was a coup. They started persecuting those who did not accept the coup, and it was indeed a coup. They created a threat to Crimea, which we had to take under our protection. They launched the war in Donbas in 2014 with the use of aircraft and artillery against civilians. This is when it all started… They launched a large scale military operation, then another one. When they failed, they started to prepare the next one. All this against the background of military development of this territory and opening of NATO’s doors. How could we not express concern over what was happening?”

“Our goal is to stop this war, and we did not start this war in 2022. This is an attempt to stop it… No, we haven’t achieved our aims yet because one of them is de-nazification. This means the prohibition of all kinds of neo-Nazi movements. This is one of the problems that we discussed during the negotiation process, which ended in Istanbul early this year…and it was not our initiative, because we were told, by the Europeans in particular, that it was necessary to create conditions for the final signing of the documents.”

“Further on, the president of Ukraine issued a decree prohibiting negotiations with us. Let him cancel that decree, and that’s it. We have never refused negotiations, indeed. We hear all the time, is Russia ready? Yes. We have not refused. It was them who publicly refused. Well, let him cancel his decree and enter into negotiations. We have never refused.”

Check out the interview for yourself and give us your thoughts in the comments.

Continue Reading

Tucker Carlson

Tucker: Fossil Fuels in Space?

The IPCC and all these so-called scientists from NASA, NOAA, and all of them are not doing their due diligence.

Published

on

If fossil fuels come from fossils, why is there oil and natural gas on other planets? Tucker interviews Dr. Willie Soon on the climate, sun activity, and the current state of science. Highlights include:

“In the United States, we often refer to our main sources of energy as ‘fossil fuels’. Oil, natural gas, coal, they’re ‘fossil fuels’ because they come form fossils, ancient organic material, forests, jungles, plankton, dinosaurs. Held under the ground for millennia, they transform into oil, gas and coal. Everybody thinks that’s true. On the other hand, there’s evidence that maybe it’s not the whole story. If that’s where fossil fuels come from, if that’s how hydrocarbons are made, then how come they’re found so deep under the oceans and at the top of the Earth? How come one of Saturn’s moons, according to scientists, has more oil and natural gas than Earth? Were there dinosaurs and planktons and forests at one point on one of Saturn’s moons? Probably not. So, if all hydrocarbons aren’t from fossils, where are they from and why isn’t this commonly known, and what are the implications of it, and what does it tell us about our modern climate change policy?”

“It’s the sun, actually, that does a lot of this. The glacial, like, this period called Little Ice Age from about 1300 to 1900, you know, very cool, and then there’s a bit of a warm period from 880 to about 1200, you know, it was warm. I mean, you can grow wine in England, right? And now you cannot grow wine, right? /Things like that. I mean, Greenland was green back then, but now it’s full of glaciers, ice is coming in, so what are you talking about exactly?”

“There’s another effect that is very, very important. It’s basically because the sun, the earth is forced to go around the sun, and then the orbit changes ever so slightly because of perturbation from all the other planets… Jupiter, Saturn, and even Venus, and Mars, they are actually controlling what we do. And the moon as well is very important. But that other factors [sic], the orbits plus the changes of the sun by itself, between how bright, how dim it is. These two factors can explain just about everything that we know.”

“This year, just two months ago, we published two more papers, convincingly show that even the thermometer data that they show you is not what it is. It’s actually not measuring ‘climate’, it’s measuring urban heat and island changes…If you go to the inner part of the big city…You go to inner cities, much warmer than outside because of concrete retaining all the heat, or you change all the surfaces, the surface becomes impervious, which means there’s no breathing, no water going in and out… What we show is that it’s not a phenomenon just on local signs. You average over this, you can see the effect all over the northern hemisphere.. And they tell you this is global temperature.”

“The IPCC and all these so-called scientists from NASA, NOAA, and all of them are not doing their due diligence. They are putting you…very bad quality data products. Not only that, they hide it. Some of them it’s so difficult to get the data.”

You can find the links below and leave us your thoughts in the comments:

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending