Tucker: This is an attack on your autonomy ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Tucker Carlson

Tucker: This is an attack on your autonomy

Banning the gas engine is, among many other things, is an attack on your autonomy.



Why are politicians insisting you switch to electric vehicles when one flight on their private jets puts out more emissions than your car does in several months? Tucker takes a look. Highlights include:

“On April 24 of last year the state of California finally achieved what the Green movement has dreamt about for decades, it happened. The State Energy Authority in California was able to generate 95% of its total power from entirely renewable sources. They said it couldn’t be done, we said it couldn’t be done, but just months into the Joe Biden administration, California did it.”

“It’s a moment that will live alongside Thomas Edison’s invention of the incandescent light bulb, alongside Neil Armstrong’s stroll on the surface of the moon. It is s day we saw a glimpse of humanity’s future. That’s what the news accounts told us, but actually there were some caveats to this achievement. For starters, April is not the time to test a power grid, it’s the most temperate month of the year when electricity use is at its lowest. Nor was the grid in question statewide, it didn’t, for example, supply power to Los Angeles, which is by far the biggest city in California. And now that we’re being honest, it wasn’t entirely renewable. As the LA Times conceded…the state of California was actually also burning a bunch of natural gas.”

“The green energy miracle that sent chills down the spines of California power executives, the event they described as ‘amazing’ lasted for a total of, can you guess? Four seconds. Not days or hours, seconds. Four seconds. That’s what California politicians were bragging about. Four seconds of not actually renewable energy. But the celebration obscured an inconvenient fact. Just a few months earlier, in mid August, California’s green energy grid had collapsed completely.”

“The problem did not improve. In fact, it got worse. The California Energy Commission has just issued a report predicting widespread power outages in the state of California for the next five years, at least, and of course September will always be the worst month. As the vice chairman of the commission put it, ‘Securing energy reliability is a tremendous responsibility. The responsibility is becoming increasingly difficult to fulfill with the tools we have in hand.’”

“The instinct behind all of this is, of course, totalitarian, which is to say total control over you, and banning the gas engine is, among many other things, an attack on your autonomy. Electric vehicles can be, above all, controlled by the people who control the grid. And that means the next time that California’s energy regulator decides to shut off the power, you can’t go anywhere. You can’t leave California.”

“It’s not just California. It’s not just happening there. It’s also happening in more reasonable places like Virginia. Law in Virginia currently requires gasoline engines, gasoline cars to be phased out by 2035, which is pretty soon. In all, 15 states have supported California’s plan to force ‘zero emission’ vehicles, none of which are zero emission, they’re just electric and can therefore be controlled by the energy grid and the regulators who oversee it. And it’s not just 15 states, it’s the federal government. According to the Biden administration, everybody will be required to drive an electric car by 2035.”

“Another cascade of unemployable morons, every one of whom has a long track record of failure, not one of whom has ever done anything in the real world, all of whom giving you a moral lecture about how your car is destroying the planet when they’re flying private. How long is the country going to put up with this?”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Tucker Carlson

Martha’s Vineyard Hypocrisy

The ones who claim to be the ‘best people’ are actually the worst people.



Tucker’s coverage of the recent visit some Venezuelans made to Martha’s Vineyard continues. Highlights include:

“Those brief hours our Venezuelan brothers and sisters spent on Martha’s Vineyard changed history and left what they’re calling ‘an indelible mark’ on the people who lived there. ‘They enriched us,’ said one resident, ‘we were happy to help them on their journey.’ Unfortunately, as it turned out, that journey ended abruptly at a military base on Cape Cod where our Venezuelan brothers and sisters are being held against their will.”

“The people of Martha’s Vineyard knew this was going to happen, and yet none of them thought to tell their Venezuelan brothers and sisters before it happened.”

“Fifty brown people was too many for the people of Martha’s Vineyard. They called in the army to have them removed, like trash, as one island resident said. So actually, judging by their behavior and not simply by their lawn signs, which is the best way to judge people, the people of Martha’s Vineyard are not especially compassionate. In fact, they’re small-minded, and cheap, and pretty nasty, as any waiter or babysitter who works on the island can tell you. So, once again, the ones who claim to be the ‘best people’ are actually the worst people.”

“Actually, the people of Martha’s Vineyard, the residents there are the ones who did the tricking. They tricked the Venezuelans into going to a military base. But that wasn’t deception, no. According to Elizabeth Warren it was an act of love.”

Watch the video below and give us some love in the comments.

Continue Reading

Tucker Carlson

Obama’s DOJ allows record crime in Chicago

George Soros backed a prosecutor named Kim Fox who turned Chicago over to the most vicious people who live there.



Tucker takes a look at how even the good neighborhoods in Chicago became gang run dystopias. Highlights include:

“Imagine dystopia. You hear that word frequently, what does it mean? Picture it in your mind’s eye. Dystopia is a world where the police will not protect you. They refuse.”

“And at the same time, you are not allowed to protect yourself.”

“So, who does that leave in charge? Who runs a world like that? Well, young men with guns. They’re in charge, the cruelest, most violent element of any society, the people with the least to lose. People like that have all the power. You have no power, and that means that everything you have is theirs.”

“According to reporting by CWB Chicago, just minutes after Ryan King was threatened with death for daring to walk outside in his own neighborhood, Chicago police spotted the gunmen’s vehicle, but there was nothing they could do about it.”

“Their supervisor ordered them not to pursue it, so the criminals just drove off, and of course they committed more violent crimes.”

“Police believe at least two organized armed gangs are now operating with impunity around Bucktown, which means the gangs are in charge now. That’s what the collapse of civilization looks like.”

“So, how did this happen? Well, it’s no mystery. There are many threads. But George Soros is a big one. Soros paid for this to happen. Soros backed a prosecutor named Kim Fox who turned Chicago over to the most vicious people who live there.”

“She’s not the only person who did this, the federal government also played a role. Over the eight years of the Barak Obama administration, the Department of Justice forced more than a dozen police departments around the country to enter into something called ‘dissent decrees.’ Chicago was one of them.”

“Now, all of these decrees took the same form. They pronounce police departments guilty of racism if those departments disproportionally interact with African Americans, regardless of whether those interactions were legally justified. In other words, the law is entirely irrelevaNt to the dissent decree, and so is reality itself.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

Continue Reading


Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.