Tucker: This is an attack on your autonomy ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Tucker Carlson

Tucker: This is an attack on your autonomy

Banning the gas engine is, among many other things, is an attack on your autonomy.

Published

on

Why are politicians insisting you switch to electric vehicles when one flight on their private jets puts out more emissions than your car does in several months? Tucker takes a look. Highlights include:

“On April 24 of last year the state of California finally achieved what the Green movement has dreamt about for decades, it happened. The State Energy Authority in California was able to generate 95% of its total power from entirely renewable sources. They said it couldn’t be done, we said it couldn’t be done, but just months into the Joe Biden administration, California did it.”

“It’s a moment that will live alongside Thomas Edison’s invention of the incandescent light bulb, alongside Neil Armstrong’s stroll on the surface of the moon. It is s day we saw a glimpse of humanity’s future. That’s what the news accounts told us, but actually there were some caveats to this achievement. For starters, April is not the time to test a power grid, it’s the most temperate month of the year when electricity use is at its lowest. Nor was the grid in question statewide, it didn’t, for example, supply power to Los Angeles, which is by far the biggest city in California. And now that we’re being honest, it wasn’t entirely renewable. As the LA Times conceded…the state of California was actually also burning a bunch of natural gas.”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Antifa is back in force

“The green energy miracle that sent chills down the spines of California power executives, the event they described as ‘amazing’ lasted for a total of, can you guess? Four seconds. Not days or hours, seconds. Four seconds. That’s what California politicians were bragging about. Four seconds of not actually renewable energy. But the celebration obscured an inconvenient fact. Just a few months earlier, in mid August, California’s green energy grid had collapsed completely.”

“The problem did not improve. In fact, it got worse. The California Energy Commission has just issued a report predicting widespread power outages in the state of California for the next five years, at least, and of course September will always be the worst month. As the vice chairman of the commission put it, ‘Securing energy reliability is a tremendous responsibility. The responsibility is becoming increasingly difficult to fulfill with the tools we have in hand.’”

“The instinct behind all of this is, of course, totalitarian, which is to say total control over you, and banning the gas engine is, among many other things, an attack on your autonomy. Electric vehicles can be, above all, controlled by the people who control the grid. And that means the next time that California’s energy regulator decides to shut off the power, you can’t go anywhere. You can’t leave California.”

“It’s not just California. It’s not just happening there. It’s also happening in more reasonable places like Virginia. Law in Virginia currently requires gasoline engines, gasoline cars to be phased out by 2035, which is pretty soon. In all, 15 states have supported California’s plan to force ‘zero emission’ vehicles, none of which are zero emission, they’re just electric and can therefore be controlled by the energy grid and the regulators who oversee it. And it’s not just 15 states, it’s the federal government. According to the Biden administration, everybody will be required to drive an electric car by 2035.”

“Another cascade of unemployable morons, every one of whom has a long track record of failure, not one of whom has ever done anything in the real world, all of whom giving you a moral lecture about how your car is destroying the planet when they’re flying private. How long is the country going to put up with this?”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Tucker Carlson

The only people who liked Jeffrey Epstein were his friends, and some of them are clearly happy he’s dead

You don’t want to live in a country where it’s possible to murder people in federal lockup, cover up the killings and then get away with them.

Published

on

Tucker recounts the strange circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death and investigation surround it. Why has it gone nowhere after 3 years, and why don’t the answers we have add up? Highlights include:

“On Saturday morning, August 10, 2019, William Barr was working in his home office when his chief of staff called to say that Jeffrey Epstein had just been found dead in his cell in New York City.”

“Barr was shocked and upset to hear this. His first reaction, as he recounts in his memoir, was to worry that some people in America might not buy the idea that Jeffrey Epstein had killed himself. ‘No one’s going to believe it was a suicide,’ Barr fretted to his chief of staff, ‘There will be conspiracy theories all over the place.'”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Antifa is back in force

“Now, that’s a pretty odd response, if you think about it. At that time, there was no way that Bill Barr could have known for sure how Jeffrey Epstein had died. So, you would think, as the Attorney General, his first concern would be finding out what actually happened. But, instead, his first concern was worry that the public might jump to unapproved conclusions about what happened. And, in some ways, Bill Barr was right to worry. Many Americans did not believe that Jeffrey Epstein had killed himself, given the strange circumstances of his death.”

“You don’t want to live in a country where it’s possible to murder people in federal lockup, cover up the killings and then get away with them. That’s scary. That should not be allowed in this or any other civilized place. But in the case of Jeffrey Epstein, it appears that it was allowed, and on one level you can see why it was. This is one of those crimes that has no natural constituency pushing to solve it.”

“The only people who liked Jeffrey Epstein were his friends, and some of them are clearly happy he’s dead.”

“Why do so many public officials persist in claiming that Jeffrey Epstein attempted suicide in prison once before, on July 23, 2019? Now, that’s a very convenient claim if you’re trying to convince people that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself, but there’s no evidence that it’s true. In fact, Jeffrey Epstein himself adamantly denied ever trying to kill himself, in prison or out. He denied this to his friends, to his lawyers, and to prison psychologists. He said, instead, that he was injured by another inmate.”

“Who moved Jeffery Epstein’s body, and who gave the order to do that? Epstein was discovered the morning of August 10 by a part time prison guard called Michael Thomas, who amazingly was the very same guard who discovered him in fetal position on the floor after his previous falsely reported suicide attempt.”

“But by the time the EMTs arrived, Epstein’s body had been moved to the prison infirmary, that’s a clear violation of federal policy — who ordered that? And though Jeffrey Epstein had been dead for at least two hours when the guard found him in his cell, by the time the EMTs arrived, Epstein was clad in a hospital gown.”

“That means that somebody, for some reason, cut away Jeffrey Epstein’s prison uniform and redressed his stiffening corpse in new clothes – Why would anyone do that? And then to make it even stranger, Jeffrey Epstein’s corpse was intubated. Air was blown into his lifeless lungs. It’s not clear why.”

Watch the video below and give us your thoughts in the comments:

Continue Reading

Tucker Carlson

Antifa is back in force

What you have here is the official endorsement of domestic terrorism from the highest level of the Democratic party. And why wouldn’t you? This is their militia.

Published

on

They’re baaaaaack … as if they’d gone anywhere. Tucker looks at Antifa’s latest actions, and guessing by who’s defending them, who’s benefiting. Highlights include:

“Antifa is the armed instrument of the permanent ‘Democratic’ establishment in Washington. Their job is to mobilize when politically necessary. Now, this is a new thing in the United States, but political militia are a common feature in third world politics, they’re a staple in Haiti. In our country, however, only one party has them, the Democratic party. They’re the only ones with armed militia in the streets. So, with that in mind, it’s interesting to note that ‘Antifa’ is back in force, and that’s probably not a very good sign for Joe Biden. If nothing else, ‘antifa’ has a solid track record of getting rid of sitting presidents.”

“It’s always the same script. Remember when Ali Velshi stood in front of a burning police station in Minneapolis and told you that protests were ‘not generally speaking unruly’, except for, of course, the torched police station right behind us, or when CNN told us the ‘protests’ … the fiery riots in Kenosha were fiery but mostly peaceful. Meanwhile, people were being killed. They’re still saying it, but this time they’re even lazier and more corrupt. That ‘freelance reporter’ David Pisner you just saw on CNN is not actually a reporter, he’s a professional Antifa apologist.”

“Why this particular brand of dishonesty? Why are the same people who warned you about ‘right-wing extremists walking around the Capitol’ running cover for domestic terrorism in the city they’re based in? Keep in mind, this is CNN saying this, and it was CNN whose world headquarters, CNN Center in Atlanta, was destroyed by antifa in May of 2020 after St. George Floyd died. Remember that?”

“CNN is not actually on the left. They have no ideology or beliefs. CNN is above all and always foursquare on the side of the people in charge, always, that’s who they run cover for. So, they’re not actually defending antifa, they’re defending the people who benefit from antifa, and that’s the Democratic party.”

“What you have in effect here is the official endorsement of domestic terrorism from the highest level of the Democratic party, and why wouldn’t you? Again, this is their militia. These are their state sanctioned shock troops, and they are effectively immune from criticism. So, you go to jail for owning a 10-round magazine, but they get to do whatever they want.”

Watch the video below and give us your thoughts in the comments:

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending