Tucker shreds Australia's tough COVID restrictions ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Tucker Carlson

Tucker shreds Australia’s tough COVID restrictions

What is the point of vaccination? Why did the federal government in Australia lock everybody down if there’s no actual way to stop the lockdowns?

Published

on

Tucker gives his take on Australian government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and the protests that have ensued because of it. And how it could happen further west.

Highlights include:

“Two years ago, June 2019, the federal police in Sydney raided the offices of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. They weren’t at all unclear about why they were raiding the offices.”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Tyrannical: The WHO’s New Global Pandemic Treaty

“It wasn’t a crime to broadcast the story, and Australia’s federal police didn’t pretend it was. Instead, they served the broadcaster with a warrant that authorized them, the police, to cover up any evidence of the Australian military’s misconduct. The warrant allowed police to ‘add, copy, delete, or alter any material they wanted to alter on the broadcaster’s computer.’”

“Two years later, what does Australia look like? Well, it looks a lot like China did at the beginning of the pandemic. That’s the sad truth.”

“This isn’t all of Australia. The whole country is not locked down. In Australia, most of the lockdowns are in the eastern part of the country, that’s where the capital of the country is, that’s where the federal government has the most control. The western part, the less populated part of Australia meanwhile, which is home to most of the country’s national resources, isn’t locked down at all.”

“Western Australia has had virtually no cases of covid. How does that happen? How does western Australia not lock down but remain virtually covid-free? Simple. By controlling its borders.”

“Here’s the revealing thing. In Australia, the federal government is angry that western Australia has closed its borders. They want that part of the country to open those borders. Really? Why would that be?”

“Ohh. So, you have to get vaccinated to have any of your freedoms, but even if you are vaccinated, you’re not allowed to go to church. So, what is the point of vaccination? Why did the federal government in Australia lock everybody down if there’s no actual way to stop the lockdowns?”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Tucker Carlson

Tyrannical: The WHO’s New Global Pandemic Treaty

The Biden administration is very close to handing the World Health Organization power over every aspect of your life. Imagine the civil liberties abuses of the Covid lockdowns, but permanent.

Published

on

Do You Think It’s Alright? This Real Good Lookin’ Boy is talkin’ ’bout The WHO, and I don’t mean the band. Here’s hoping the US Won’t Get Fooled Again. Highlights include:

The Biden administration is very close to handing the World Health Organization power over every aspect, the intimate aspects, of your life. So, imagine the civil liberties abuses that you lived through during the covid lockdowns, but permanent, and administered from a foreign country. Here’s what we’re looking at tonight. This January, the Biden administration submitted a series of proposed amendments to something called ‘the International Health Regulations.’

Now, the Biden administration’s amendments, along with those from several other countries, will be combined to create a ‘new global pandemic treaty.’

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Tyrannical: The WHO’s New Global Pandemic Treaty

That treaty is set to be adopted starting this weekend in Geneva at the World Health Assembly. Now, the full text of the treaty is not yet finished, but a WHO working group has summarized what it’s going to look like. The document begins by promising to restrict the WHO’s authority to just pandemics — calm down, it’s just pandemics.”

“Here’s the catch. the World Health Organization gets to define what a pandemic is, when a pandemic is in progress, and how long a pandemic lasts. Then you read the fine print and you realize the WHO will have total authority over emergency operations in the United States if there is ever a ‘public health emergency.'”

“What qualifies exactly as a public health emergency? Well, they don’t define that, but they get to. They get to decide what a ‘public health emergency’ is, and then they have total authority.”

“You can see where this is going. Now the Biden administration has made certain that unelected bureaucrats at the WHO have total authority to declare and define public health emergencies. The White House eliminated a provision that would’ve required the World Health Organization to ‘consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring in.’”

“So, as originally written, they couldn’t do anything without the permission of their member countries’ governments, but thanks to the change that the Biden administration pushed, effectively there is no limit at all on WHO’s power.”

“And it gets worse from there. The treaty also mandates a ‘whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach to pandemic preparedness.’ Every society is always ‘preparing for a pandemic’ and that means there will not be a moment ever when the WHO doesn’t have operational control so-called ‘public health matters’ in this country. Now, what’s that going to mean, exactly?”

“Every member country in the WHO must ‘inform WHO about the establishment of its national competent authority responsible for the overall implementation of the IHR that will be recognized and held accountable.’ Under this treaty, WHO members must enforce orders from the WHO, they have to act as the heavies for the WHO, and if they don’t, they’ll be sanctioned.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

Continue Reading

Tucker Carlson

Upset about inflation? Shut up, racist!

There you are, complaining again about the precipitous decline in your standard of living. That’s always the first sign of a racist.

Published

on

Tucker lays out the symptoms of racism. Not judging people by their skin color, no, but recognizing what’s going on and complaining about it, that’s racism. Highlights include:

“Are you still not convinced that Joe Biden knows how to handle inflation? Did that rattle your confidence rather than bolster it? Then, honestly, there’s nothing we can do for you at this point. You’re beyond reach.”

“In fact, you know what you are, and you may have seen this coming? You’re a racist. That’s what we call people who continue to ask complicated long questions about Joe Biden’s economic program. They’re racists, and getting rid of them is America’s greatest problem.”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Tyrannical: The WHO’s New Global Pandemic Treaty

“Talking out of turn, reading your own script rather than the one that Chuck Todd provides you, is white supremacy. And that means, if you’re upset about food shortages or blackouts, you’re a racist, racist, racist, racist. There you are, complaining again about the precipitous decline in your standard of living. That’s always the first sign of a racist.”

“You don’t like crime? You don’t like litter? You don’t like inflation? You’re against public urination in New York City? You know what you are? You’re a bigot, pal. Stop complaining.”

“The problem is definitely not that we’re running out of energy to power our civilization, that’s not a big deal at all, and that’s why you probably didn’t read about the fact that the interior department just announced it is closing millions of acres to domestic energy production. Sorry, gone, can’t have the energy there. It exists, but you can’t have it. You know what we can do, though? Buy it from Venezuela. Yes, we can.”

“Twenty minutes ago, they told you Venezuela was a criminal regime. Now Venezuela’s going to provide the oil, not us, we can’t, that’s immoral ‘cuz climate change, existential, but Venezuela can.”

Read the video below and watch us a comment in the … thing.

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending