Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund reveals what really happened on January 6th.
There’s a process for when law enforcement needs help and we dial 911, it’s to the military, and that failed.
Tucker re-interviews Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund about the happenings on a certain January 6, an interview he did while with Fox News, but which never aired. Highlights include:
“If you wanted to understand what happened on January 6, 2021 at the US capitol, one of the first people you’d talk to, maybe the first, would be Steven Sund. Sund was the chief of Capitol Police that day, he knew more about what happened than virtually anyone else in the United States, and yet Congressional investigators weren’t interested in talking to him, the media not interested in talking to him, but we were…What he has to say is shocking; we recommend you watch.”
Sund: “…Coming into it, absolutely zero, with the intelligence we know now existed, talking about attacking the capitol, killing my police officers, attacking members of Congress and killing members of Congress, none of that was included in the intelligence coming up to it… Well, we now know FBI, DHS, was swimming in that intelligence. We also know now that the military seemed to have some very concerning intelligence as well…”
Sund: “…This gets really convoluted once you get into the response on January 6 and how I was delayed getting resources. You have the United States military, the acting secretary of defense, Miller, and General Milley had both discussed locking down the city of Washington DC because they were so worried about violence at the capitol on January 6. On Sunday and Monday they had been discussing locking down the city, revoking permits on capitol hill because of the concern for violence… You know who issues the permits on capitol hill for demonstrations, I do. You know who wasn’t told? Me. Instead, on January 4, what does Miller do? He puts out a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying various weapons, any weapons, any civil disobedience equipment that would be utilized for the very demonstrations or violence that he sees coming, it just doesn’t make any sense.”
Sund: “Congress passed a law that requires me to go to the Sergeant at Arms in advance of an event to request federal resources such as the National Guard. Congress passed a law, it’s 2 US Code 1970, look it up, just make sure you look it up before December 22 when they changed it . So, what was in effect on January 6…that requires me to go and get approval for bringing in National Guard or federal assistance, in advance, I have to go to the Capitol Police Board and get approval from Congressional leadership in advance, like I did on January 3. I was denied twice, because of optics and because the intelligence didn’t support it, think about that.”
Sund: “There’s a process for when law enforcement needs help and we dial 911, it’s to the military, and that failed. That failed miserably, because of the law Congress passed and the denial I was receiving.”
Sund: “There’s intel talking about going up and killing the ‘palace guards’, those are my officers. There’s intel talking about using chemicals at some of the entry points, there’s intel indicating that they’ve done surveillance at some of the entry points at the Capitol. None of that’s been included. They talk about burning down the Supreme Court, they talk about different attacks on different members of Congress and they talk about storming the building. Not a single word of that is included in any of the intelligence assessments. As a matter of fact, my intelligence unit is putting out documents on the fourth, fifth and sixth indicating a low probability of civil disobedience.”
Sund: “The very next day, less than 24 hours after we got control of the Capitol, Nancy Pelosi goes on national tv, blames the leadership at the top of Capitol Police, calls for my resignation on national TV and then lies about me.”
You can find the link below and give us your thoughts in the comments.
Ep. 15 Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund reveals what really happened on January 6th. Our Fox News interview with him never aired, so we invited him back. pic.twitter.com/opDlu4QGlp
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) August 10, 2023
We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
Our goal is to stop this war, and we did not start this war in 2022. This is an attempt to stop it.
The interview that’s had most of your “legacy media’s” panties in a twist all week has finally happened.
I don’t remember anyone making a fuss when Dan Rather interviewed Saddam Hussein, just sayin’.
Tucker Carlson gets Vladimir Putin’s take on, among other things, the current situation in Ukraine, how it started and possible resolutions, Russia’s relationship with China,the world economy, and a look into the future. Highlights include:
“After 1991 when Russia expected that it would be welcomed into the brotherly family of civilized nations, nothing like this happened. You tricked us. I don’t mean you personally when I say you. Of course I’m talking about the United States. The promise was that NATO would not expand eastward. But it happened five times. There were five waves of expansion. We tolerated all that. We were trying to persuade them. We were saying, please don’t. We are as bourgeois now as you are. We are a market economy and there is no communist party power, let’s negotiate.
“The events in the Middle East, in Iraq, we were building relations with the United States in a very soft, prudent, cautious manner. I repeatedly raised the issue that the United States should not support separatism or terrorism in the North Caucasus, but they continued to do it anyway. And political support, information support, financial support, even military support came from the United States and its satellites for terrorist groups in the Caucasus. I once raised this issue with my colleague, also the president of the United States. He says it’s impossible, do you have proof? I said yes, I was prepared for this conversation, and I gave him that proof. He looked at it, and you know what he said? I apologize, but that’s what happened. I’ll quote, “Well, I’m gonna kick their ass.” We waited and waited for some response…The CIA replied, “We have been working with the opposition in Russia. We believe that this is the thing to do and we will on doing it.”
“…In 2008, the doors of NATO were opened for Ukraine. In 2014, there was a coup. They started persecuting those who did not accept the coup, and it was indeed a coup. They created a threat to Crimea, which we had to take under our protection. They launched the war in Donbas in 2014 with the use of aircraft and artillery against civilians. This is when it all started… They launched a large scale military operation, then another one. When they failed, they started to prepare the next one. All this against the background of military development of this territory and opening of NATO’s doors. How could we not express concern over what was happening?”
“Our goal is to stop this war, and we did not start this war in 2022. This is an attempt to stop it… No, we haven’t achieved our aims yet because one of them is de-nazification. This means the prohibition of all kinds of neo-Nazi movements. This is one of the problems that we discussed during the negotiation process, which ended in Istanbul early this year…and it was not our initiative, because we were told, by the Europeans in particular, that it was necessary to create conditions for the final signing of the documents.”
“Further on, the president of Ukraine issued a decree prohibiting negotiations with us. Let him cancel that decree, and that’s it. We have never refused negotiations, indeed. We hear all the time, is Russia ready? Yes. We have not refused. It was them who publicly refused. Well, let him cancel his decree and enter into negotiations. We have never refused.”
Check out the interview for yourself and give us your thoughts in the comments.
Ep. 73 The Vladimir Putin Interview pic.twitter.com/67YuZRkfLL
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 8, 2024
The IPCC and all these so-called scientists from NASA, NOAA, and all of them are not doing their due diligence.
If fossil fuels come from fossils, why is there oil and natural gas on other planets? Tucker interviews Dr. Willie Soon on the climate, sun activity, and the current state of science. Highlights include:
“In the United States, we often refer to our main sources of energy as ‘fossil fuels’. Oil, natural gas, coal, they’re ‘fossil fuels’ because they come form fossils, ancient organic material, forests, jungles, plankton, dinosaurs. Held under the ground for millennia, they transform into oil, gas and coal. Everybody thinks that’s true. On the other hand, there’s evidence that maybe it’s not the whole story. If that’s where fossil fuels come from, if that’s how hydrocarbons are made, then how come they’re found so deep under the oceans and at the top of the Earth? How come one of Saturn’s moons, according to scientists, has more oil and natural gas than Earth? Were there dinosaurs and planktons and forests at one point on one of Saturn’s moons? Probably not. So, if all hydrocarbons aren’t from fossils, where are they from and why isn’t this commonly known, and what are the implications of it, and what does it tell us about our modern climate change policy?”
“It’s the sun, actually, that does a lot of this. The glacial, like, this period called Little Ice Age from about 1300 to 1900, you know, very cool, and then there’s a bit of a warm period from 880 to about 1200, you know, it was warm. I mean, you can grow wine in England, right? And now you cannot grow wine, right? /Things like that. I mean, Greenland was green back then, but now it’s full of glaciers, ice is coming in, so what are you talking about exactly?”
“There’s another effect that is very, very important. It’s basically because the sun, the earth is forced to go around the sun, and then the orbit changes ever so slightly because of perturbation from all the other planets… Jupiter, Saturn, and even Venus, and Mars, they are actually controlling what we do. And the moon as well is very important. But that other factors [sic], the orbits plus the changes of the sun by itself, between how bright, how dim it is. These two factors can explain just about everything that we know.”
“This year, just two months ago, we published two more papers, convincingly show that even the thermometer data that they show you is not what it is. It’s actually not measuring ‘climate’, it’s measuring urban heat and island changes…If you go to the inner part of the big city…You go to inner cities, much warmer than outside because of concrete retaining all the heat, or you change all the surfaces, the surface becomes impervious, which means there’s no breathing, no water going in and out… What we show is that it’s not a phenomenon just on local signs. You average over this, you can see the effect all over the northern hemisphere.. And they tell you this is global temperature.”
“The IPCC and all these so-called scientists from NASA, NOAA, and all of them are not doing their due diligence. They are putting you…very bad quality data products. Not only that, they hide it. Some of them it’s so difficult to get the data.”
You can find the links below and leave us your thoughts in the comments:
Ep. 62 If fossil fuels come from fossils, why have scientists found them on one of Saturn’s moons? A lot of what you’ve heard about energy is false. Dr. Willie Soon explains.
(01:49) Fossil Fuels in Space
(14:27) Global Warming Throughout History
(25:31) Outside… pic.twitter.com/GMaDkDl8z9
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) January 9, 2024
Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.
GOP Primaries, for GOP Registered Voters
Fracturing Along Fault Lines
Tucker: Ep. 73 The Vladimir Putin Interview
Will Democrats Do What They Must?
Our Candidate and Our Uncertain Future
Getting Beyond our Convenient Political Narratives
Work-Life Balance in Your Life
Sites We Like
Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.