Tucker: Biden's first SOTU ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Tucker Carlson

Tucker: Biden’s first SOTU

There is an awful lot of lying going on, an unprecedented amount of lying.

Published

on

Tucker cautions his viewers to be very wary of what we hear with distraction and manipulation running rampant among news media around the world, and interviews retired Army Colonel Doug MacGregor about Putin’s possible goals in the Ukraine invasion. Highlights include:

“What is the state of our union tonight? Well, in a word, it is fragile, very fragile. The United States is poorer, it’s more fearful, it’s far less free than it was when Joe Biden became president just 13 months ago. Joe Biden inherited a divided country, a very divided country, and then he proceeded to make it much angrier. History will judge Joe Biden for that, but in the meantime, voters already are. Biden’s pol numbers have dropped to the point that it’s impossible to explain them without admitting that you were at fault. “

“The question is, how does he explain his failures? And the answer is, mostly, he doesn’t. Biden is guaranteed to make sympathetic noises about inflation and gas prices, he has no choice but to do that, but he also has no answers. He cannot fix the problems that he has caused. Thankfully, from his perspective (and we’re preparing you, this is very cynical), Biden now has a war to talk about, and of course that’s what he will do tonight. The White House understands the invasion of Ukraine is a chance to change the subject, it is what Bloomberg News described today as a ‘political reset’. So, forget what Biden did to your country, and your economy, and your school, Joe Biden is Winston Churchill now.”

“Our advice is be very wary of what you hear. There is an awful lot of lying going on, an unprecedented amount of lying. This war is a humanitarian tragedy, that we know, but the war is also a political event that various groups, including in this country, are leveraging feverishly in the hope of gaining more power for themselves — that is real. So, to gain that power, they’re manipulating you, the consumer of news, and they’re doing it in ways that are often hidden and therefore highly insidious, and we would say immoral.”

“Vladimir Putin set out to honor his word of 2007. 2007 at the Munich Security Conference he said, ‘we will not tolerate the expansion of NATO to a point where your border is touching Russia, specifically Ukraine and Georgia. We see these as essentially trojan horses for NATO’s military power and US influence, subversion, and so forth. He then turned to several opportunities to reinforce that over and over and over again, most recently with president Biden, in the hopes that he could avoid taking action to effectively clean out Eastern Ukraine of any opposition forces whatsoever, and to put his forces in a position, vis-a-vis NATO, to deter us from any further attempts to influence or change Ukraine into effectively a platform for the projection of US and western power into Russia.”

“This is the interesting part. Now everyone is talking about spending lots of money on defense and lots of money for NATO, but very shortly people are going to begin to ask ‘Why? Why are we doing it? Because it’s patently obvious that NATO is not in a position to fight, not in a position to challenge the Russians.’ So I think Mr. Biden’s problem tonight is not just his narrative is going to break down over the next few days as it becomes obvious that this whole Ukraine business was a fantasy on his part. He’s going to end up trying to write checks that he can’t cash.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Tucker Carlson

Upset about inflation? Shut up, racist!

There you are, complaining again about the precipitous decline in your standard of living. That’s always the first sign of a racist.

Published

on

Tucker lays out the symptoms of racism. Not judging people by their skin color, no, but recognizing what’s going on and complaining about it, that’s racism. Highlights include:

“Are you still not convinced that Joe Biden knows how to handle inflation? Did that rattle your confidence rather than bolster it? Then, honestly, there’s nothing we can do for you at this point. You’re beyond reach.”

“In fact, you know what you are, and you may have seen this coming? You’re a racist. That’s what we call people who continue to ask complicated long questions about Joe Biden’s economic program. They’re racists, and getting rid of them is America’s greatest problem.”

“Talking out of turn, reading your own script rather than the one that Chuck Todd provides you, is white supremacy. And that means, if you’re upset about food shortages or blackouts, you’re a racist, racist, racist, racist. There you are, complaining again about the precipitous decline in your standard of living. That’s always the first sign of a racist.”

“You don’t like crime? You don’t like litter? You don’t like inflation? You’re against public urination in New York City? You know what you are? You’re a bigot, pal. Stop complaining.”

“The problem is definitely not that we’re running out of energy to power our civilization, that’s not a big deal at all, and that’s why you probably didn’t read about the fact that the interior department just announced it is closing millions of acres to domestic energy production. Sorry, gone, can’t have the energy there. It exists, but you can’t have it. You know what we can do, though? Buy it from Venezuela. Yes, we can.”

“Twenty minutes ago, they told you Venezuela was a criminal regime. Now Venezuela’s going to provide the oil, not us, we can’t, that’s immoral ‘cuz climate change, existential, but Venezuela can.”

Read the video below and watch us a comment in the … thing.

Continue Reading

Tucker Carlson

The Buffalo shooting: Biden mindlessly blames his political enemies

Joe is a divisive partisan bureaucrat bent on destroying America.

Published

on

Tucker looks at the democrat party’s reaction the the shooting in Buffalo last Saturday, and how their immigration policies may eventually backfire. Highlight’s include:

“On Saturday, Peyton Gendron, as you know, finally did what he said he would do. He committed mass murder, he opened fire on a crowd of strangers in a Buffalo supermarket. He killed ten of them.”

“So, how did the adults around him let this happen? In a country with functioning leadership, we would be asking that question. The signs of mental illness were certainly there. The people in charge missed those signs, or didn’t take them seriously enough, weren’t paying close enough attention.”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Academic Underachievement As a Permanent Condition

“In any case, they didn’t fix it, they let a killer slip through. So, what did they do wrong with Peyton Gendron, and how can we learn from it?”

“But that’s not at all what our leaders are asking tonight, hardly. Instead, they’re asking the only question that ever occurs to them: How exactly can I benefit from this? How can I leverage this tragedy to my advantage? How can other people’s suffering make me more powerful? It didn’t take Joe Biden to find a way.”

“January 6th and the Buffalo massacre. So, how is a political protest at the capitol related to a murder spree by a demented teenager in New York state over the weekend. What do those two events have in common, and who exactly are these unnamed ‘heads of state’ who are connecting this unconnected events in conversations with Joe Biden?”

“You may have wondered that, but don’t ask, because it’s not meant to be asked. It is instead a dream sequence, it’s a rhetorical device meant to connect everything that might challenge Joe Biden and bunch all of these things together in the same repulsive moral category.”

“The relentless exploitation of the internet to recruit and mobilize terrorism, okay. But can anyone show, has anyone ever shown that this specific case, Peyton Gendron, was ‘recruited and mobilized by the internet’?”

“Well, no, in fact. By his own account, he was mentally ill, he snapped. He’d been planning this for a long time, he did what his diseased brain commanded him to do. The internet did not make him do it, he did it himself. But even if Gendron had been ‘radicalized’ by what he’d read on the internet, what then, exactly? Many have been radicalized by what they’ve read.”

“Should we ban all books, all internet sites that ‘radicalize’ people? What exactly is Joe Biden saying here? Well, he’s saying that thanks to what happened in Buffalo over the weekend, you no longer have any any rights at all, including the most basic, which is to read what you want. After nullifying the First Amendment, Joe Biden moved to the Second Amendment.”

“So, because a mentally ill 18-year-old used a specific rifle to commit these crimes, you can’t have that rifle. Now, Joe Biden’s bodyguards can have that rifle, so can Nancy Pelosi’s, and of course they do. In fact, you pay for it all, But, they’re important, and you’re not, so you can’t.”

“So, because the people in charge failed to protect shoppers in Buffalo, you’re not allowed to defend your family, despite the fact you may believe your family is every bit as important as Joe Biden and his family or Nancy Pelosi and her family. But they’re not as important, so we’re going to defund the police and disarm you. That’s how it works now, sorry. And then Joe Biden got to the main point of his speech, which is that people who criticize his immigration policies are responsible for the violence you saw in Buffalo.”

“So, you lock the country down, lock kids out of their schools for two years, force them to get ‘educated’ on the internet, but it’s someone else’s fault that they’re ‘alienated.'”

“They’ve been hearing about the ‘great replacement theory.’ You’ve heard a lot about the ‘great replacement theory’ recently, it’s everywhere in the last two days, and we’re still not sure exactly what it is. Here’s what we do know for a fact. There’s a strong political component to the democratic party’s immigration policy. We’re not guessing this, we know this, and we know it because they have said so. They’ve written books on it. They say it out loud, ‘we’re doing this because it helps us to win elections.'”

“It’s something they’ve gloated about again and again and again and we think that’s wrong.”

“Maybe the funniest part is, they might not be right. The democratic party has decided that, rather than convince you, people who were born here, that their policies are helping you and making the country better and stronger, they will change the electorate.”

“But the funniest part is, they may be wrong, actually. Judging by recent polling, it turns out your average Salvadoran landscaper’s politics are a lot closer to Donald Trump’s than they are to Joe Biden’s and Nancy Pelosi’s.”

“But that’s not even the point.”

Watch as your democrat friends completely miss the hilarity of Joe Biden calling out spreading lies and violence for political power and profit, and leave us a comment.

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending