Torching A Christmas Tree Is An Attack on Christianity ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Tucker Carlson

Torching A Christmas Tree Is An Attack on Christianity

Our streets are dangerous, much more dangerous than they’ve been in a long time.

Published

on

Tucker questions the reasoning behind the increase in violence, vandalism and vagrancy in major cities. Part of the problem is not calling it what it is.
Highlights include:

“My Block, My Hood, My City is a nonprofit organization in Chicago. It’s designed to teach kids how to become responsible citizens. We can’t tell you if the program actually works, but we do know they seem to be aiming in the right direction. Last Saturday afternoon, four members of this group went to Chicago’s Bronzeville neighborhood to hang Christmas lights, a pretty nice thing to do… As the kids hung their Christmas lights, four thugs got out of an SUV and robbed them. Then a few hours later, someone set fire to a Christmas tree they had set up in a nearby park.”

“By current standards, destroying someone’s religious symbol would be called a ‘hate crime.’ That’s a category much beloved and meticulously chronicled by the Biden justice department.”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Finding Meaning in Daily Activities, Even Now

“The DOJ can tell you precisely how many Qurans were burned last year in the United States, but they don’t keep track of Christmas trees. Why is that? Well, because they could care less.”

“These are not isolated incidents, and they’re not being perpetrated by grinches.”

“Here we have yet another criminal set free by left-wing ideologues to terrorize everyone else. This is the third arson attack on a Christmas tree at least in a major American city in the past week.”

“Time to connect some dots here? No.”

“Our streets are dangerous, much more dangerous than they’ve been in a long time, in decades. There are a lot of reasons for that, but one reason is our cities are overrun with metnally unstable vagrants who are living on the sidewalks.”

“Now, for a long time, we’ve called these people homeless, but let’s stop doing that. ‘The Homeless’ is a political term which is intentionally devised to mislead you. In fact, this problem has very little to do with homes or available housing or whatever Orwellian phrase they’re using at this point to pretend these people have no place to stay.”

“A lot of them could be staying indoors; they don’t want to because they’re addicted to drugs.”

“It’s that simple.”

“These aren’t just misguided attitudes. They are suicidal attitudes. Any society that gives drug addicts preference over homeowners will not last long.”

“In the meantime, people die. People die who don’t deserve to die. In Florida the other day, a vagrant murdered a 14-year-old boy who was out riding his bike. He had felony arrests in Georgia and California, including charges for aggravated assault and battery. Why wasn’t he in jail? Because authorities in Georgia and California let him go, so he went to Florida and murdered a child.”

“Saying it out loud is a start. You cannot solve problems until you resolve to stop lying about them.”

“Right now in New York City, 83% of the people arrested on gun charges are immediately released and sent back into the community. You have prosecutors who don’t want to prosecute, they’re more focused on targeting police than targeting the bad guys in the streets.”

“The bottom line is you need real leadership that’s not gonna’ be afraid to call it what it is.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Tucker Carlson

Jan. 6 committee continues to target political opponents

Nothing that happened on January 6th came remotely close to threatening our constitutional order, or preventing Joe Biden from taking office. People who claim otherwise are lying.

Published

on

Tucker questions calling the people involved on January 6th “terrorists” when they were largely unarmed and, as far as they knew, abiding by the law. Highlights include:

“Nothing that happened on January 6th came remotely close to threatening our constitutional order, or from preventing Joe Biden from taking office. Anyone who claims otherwise is lying and should be forced to explain specifically how the mechanics of democracy were imperiled that day. But they never explain, they just yell louder and then they issue more indictments.”

“Where exactly is all this criminal white supremacy, this right-wing domestic terrorism that poses ‘the most lethal terrorist threat in the homeland’? Where is it? It doesn’t exist.”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Finding Meaning in Daily Activities, Even Now

“Many thousands of Americans are killed each year by violence, they’re murdered, but conservatives are not the ones who are murdering them. Look it up, it’s a ludicrous lie.”

“Many of the rioters were expecting war … really, were they? Then, why didn’t they bring guns to the war? The indictment doesn’t explain that. In fact, it tells us that as January 6th approached, these ‘dangerous conspirators’ who were anticipating war agreed not to bring firearms into the District of Columbia.”

“The whole point of this exercise is to redefine any opposition to the democratic party as domestic terrorism as they face defeat in the midterm election.”

“So, how do the rest of us respond as the US government redefines people who disagree with their political beliefs as terrorists? Well, there’s really only one way and it’s a nonviolent way, it’s the essential way. Refuse to play along. Don’t pretend they’re sincere, they’re not sincere. Tell the truth. Call authoritarianism what it is.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

Continue Reading

Tucker Carlson

Tucker: Biden’s new secret police force

The DOJ announced the creation of a new “domestic terrorism unit” that will target quote “anti-authority ideologies” — ideas that are now apparently illegal.

Published

on

Tucker examines the DOJ’s recent efforts to combat the greatest threat that doesn’t exist in our country: political conservatism. Highlights include:

“On his very first day as president, Joe Biden ordered federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies to prepare a review of how the administration should fight terrorism. By last June, that report was complete. It concluded that after 20 years, Islamic terror is no longer the greatest threat to this country. Instead, the agencies declared, that domestic political extremism is ‘the most urgent terrorism threat the United States faces today.'”

“The Biden administration declared, ‘the most lethal elements of today’s domestic terror threat are political conservatives.'”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Finding Meaning in Daily Activities, Even Now

“This claim is ridiculous. On its face, there is no substantial right-wing terror threat in this country, certainly not in relevant terms, there just isn’t, and no one’s shown there is. The White House knows this, of course. So they’re working hard to create the illusion of that threat.”

“When you don’t have enough domestic terrorists to justify a political purge, then you just go ahead and create them, and that’s exactly what they’ve been doing. This week the campaign against this new American Al Qaeda entered a new and very ominous phase. Two days ago, the DOJ announced the creation of a new domestic terrorism unit. It will target “anti-authority ideologues.”

Now, keep in mind, this county was founded by people who were “anti-authority ideologues,” that’s why they created America and baked the idea of opposing authority so it doesn’t get too big and take over your life into our founding documents.”

“It’s not just the government, of course. It’s people acting on behalf of the government calling for the same thing, which is censorship of political opinions. What you’re seeing here is dangerous, far more dangerous than ‘domestic terror threat’ they’ve been bloviating about for the last three days. It contravenes the First Amendment. Under the First Amendment, the government cannot coordinate with private actors to censor free speech, period.”

“There is no domestic terrorism statute in the United States, so the interpretation of domestic terrorism is up to the FBI and the justice department. If there’s such a problem with domestic terrorism, then why aren’t they arresting people and charging them under existing statues? It’s because they’re making it up.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending

Politicrossing
 
Send this to a friend