This may have been the greatest crime in history ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Tucker Carlson

This may have been the greatest crime in history

It was pretty obvious that this was more than an over-hyped public health emergency. In fact it may very well have been a crime, the greatest crime in history.

Published

on

Tucker takes another look at the coronavirus timeline, what the US media has ignored and why, and what the Wuhan Institute is doing now. Highlights include:

“The coronavirus pandemic, that would be the virus itself and our government’s response to it, turns out to have been the single most destructive event to take place in the United States in our lifetime. So destructive that it’s gonna be many years before we know for certain what the last two and a half years have cost all of us.”

“But even now the outlines of it are clear. Covid crashed our economy, first and foremost. GDP fell by the biggest percentage since The Great Depression. 22 million Americans lost their jobs in the first two months of the lockdowns, remember that?”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Do Not Make This Mistake

“What you may not know is that at least five million of them never went back to work. They dropped out of the workforce apparently for good. At the same time, as fewer people were working, thanks to the profligate lunacy of our leaders, our national debt rose by nearly $10 trillion. Unprecedented. Along with the debt, our debt to China also rose.”

“And then, at the level of our society, every bad thing became more common.”

“At the same time, thanks to the lockdowns, the tech monopolies thrived. Apple, Google, Amazon, all saw their market caps explode.”

“But no group benefited more from the covid pandemic than the leaders of communist China. By April of 2021, that would be more than a year into covid, when we were suffering here, in China the GDP had reached the highest level ever recorded. China’s economy was growing faster after the pandemic than it had been before the pandemic, and as a result of that China will soon overtake the United States as the world’s dominant economy, soon.”

“It was pretty obvious that this was more than an over-hyped public health emergency. In fact it may very well have been a crime, the greatest crime in history. Was it? It’s hard to think of to more important question than that, and yet our leaders seem curiously uninterested in answering it.”

“Shortly after Joe Biden took office, he ordered the intel agencies to determine where covid came from, and the report he got back stunned him. It was inconclusive. There were two theories, of course, one was that covid came from a lab leak in Wuhan, the other was it came from a pangolin or some kind of animal. Here’s what the intel agency said: ‘The majority of elements within the intel community do not believe there is sufficient information to assess one to be more likely than the other.’ That may seem like not a big deal to you, but if you were the democratic party, if you’d spent a year dismissing any talk of a lab leak as a racist conspiracy theory, this was stunning because it suggested that actually the CIA thought it was entirely possible that the Chinese government manufactured coronavirus.”

“’One IC element assesses with moderate confidence that the first human infection with SARS-Cov-2 most likely was the result of a laboratory-associated incident probably involving experimentation, animal handling, or sampling by the Wuhan Institute of Virology.’”

“It’s not just Biden and his administration that has ignored China’s potential involvement in creating covid. The media are not interested, either. Why is that? Well, keep in mind the government of China pays American media a lot of money. In exchange, why not ignore what could be the crime of the century? In recent years, China has spent tens of millions of dollars on advertising in American newspapers.”

“They’re stupid and they’re dishonest, but it’s more than that. Where did this talking point come from? It’s racist to point out that covid came from China. Well, this talking point became prevalent in March of 2020, and it just so happens that’s exactly when China’s state-owned media tweeted that terms like ‘Wuhan coronavirus’ were racist. Before China’s government issued that order, our media here in the United States didn’t recognize the term ‘Wuhan coronavirus’ as a slur. In fact, they themselves said it constantly.”

“So, in the face of all of this evidence which to this point is overwhelming, the World Health Organization, of all places, is demanding a new investigation into the origins of covid. Keep in mind, WHO rigged the last investigation by making Peter Daszak the sole US investigator. But officials in this country, for reasons we can’t understand, are still resisting efforts to find out what was happening at the Wuhan lab, with, by the way, the support of the US taxpayer. Now, what’s the Wuhan lab up to now? Well, it may come to a surprise to you that at the Wuhan lab, they’re now working on monkey pox viruses. In fact, they’re more than working on monkey pox viruses, they’re assembling new monkey pox viruses.”

“In the face of all of this, the White House has buried any real investigation into the origins of covid, and so this research is allowed to continue, research that could make covid look like nothing.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments:

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



News

What the Trump raid was really about

Indicting Donald Trump is a very big step, not simply because a lot of people like him and he’s the former President, but because indicting him at this point would be to reveal that this entire thing, and by ‘thing’ we mean our justice system, is just transparently political.

Published

on

Tucker looks at what didn’t make sense about the recent FBI raid on Donald Trump’s home in Florida.

Highlights include:

“No honest person could believe that the raid on Donald Trump’s home last week was a legitimate act of law enforcement — it was not. Even the Biden administration didn’t really bother to pretend otherwise. The official explanations that we have heard for the raid make no sense at all. It doesn’t matter how forcefully they are repeated by the media, they’re nonsensical.”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Do Not Make This Mistake

“For the sake of argument on our show, we’re gonna say that it is, in fact, true, and that Donald Trump did, in fact, have boxes of classified documents sitting in his cellar. Let’s say that’s true. What would it mean? Well, what it means depends in part on what the documents were. Did those documents contain meaningful information? Should they have been classified in the first place? Is there a good reason the rest of us should not have been allowed to see those documents? Now, you never hear those questions asked in public, but anyone who lives in Washington knows perfectly well they should be asked in public, a lot, because in Washington virtually anything can qualify as an official state secret, and often does.”

“If that is true, would it justify what happened? Would it justify sending a large team of federal agents to shut down the entire southern tip of Palm Beach to raid Mar-A-Lago on a weekday? No, it wouldn’t. So, one of the laws they’re telling you that Trump broke doesn’t even have criminal penalties attached to it because it’s not serious enough. Federal paramilitaries don’t show up at your house when you violate the Presidential Records Act.”

“There was endless huffing on television about something called the ‘rule of law’ and how absolutely no one is above that, no one, not even a former President. We’re informed of this by the same people who paid rioters to burn down our cities, the ones who eliminated bail, the ones who encouraged tens of millions of foreign nationals to ignore our federal immigration statutes and move to our country permanently at public expense as a reward for breaking our laws. But, keep in mind, no one is above the law.”

“It’s exactly what it looks like: a show of force against the opposition leader by the head of state and his personal bodyguards. If this happened in any other country, it immediately would be denounced as the act of a dictator.”

“Now, superficially all of this is about Donald Trump, and on some level it is. Permanent Washington does not want Trump to run again. Of course, it’s their greatest fear, and they’re doing all he [sic] can to prevent it. It turns out democracy was too important to let voters choose their own president. But if you take three steps back and consider what’s actually going on, you’ll see that none of this is really about Donald Trump the man. It’s about power, and that means it’s about crushing and humiliating anyone who gets in the way of people who want to retain power.”

“Indicting Donald Trump is a very big step, not simply because a lot of people like him and he’s the former President, but because indicting him at this point would be to reveal that this entire thing, and by ‘thing’ we mean our justice system, is just transparently political. It’s just a means to an end, a means to power, and people know that at this point. They’ve watched it. They understand what’s happening, even people who don’t like Donald Trump, even people who didn’t vote for Donald Trump and don’t want to vote for him in 2024. They know, and they can’t un-know, and that means that we are at this point on the edge of something unprecedented, and something awful.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

Continue Reading

Tucker Carlson

Tucker: They don’t care about you at all

Democrats don’t care about inflation because they’re rich and it doesn’t affect them.

Published

on

Tucker gives his analysis of the Democratic primary in New York City, where it’s incumbent vs incumbent because of a new redistricting. Remember that Futurama episode in which two identical politicians were running against each other? It’s kinda’ like that, except not funny.
“Highlights” include:

“If you’re an incumbent member of Congress, pretty much the last thing you ever want to do is to debate a primary opponent in public. As a sitting member, you already have every possible advantage, unless you drop dead during a speech or get drunk and take your clothes off on a commercial airplane, you are very likely to be reelected to Congress.”

“So, a televised debate cannot help you. It is all risk and no upside.”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Do Not Make This Mistake

“But occasionally there is no avoiding it. Democrats held a primary debate in New York City last night, they had no choice. Both the candidates in this race are incumbent. Thanks to a court decision that redrew congressional boundaries, the two most powerful members of the New York delegation are now running against each other for the same seat.”

“What was very interesting and what tells you a lot about the Democratic party is how these two candidates talked about their personal accomplishments and their goals for the country.”

“Now, we should tell you, having watched it, that figuring out exactly what Maloney and Nadler were trying to say was not easy. These are not spry, articulate people. They’re not magicians with the English language.”

“But at one point, Nadler gathered the strength to boast about his greatest accomplishment in the Congress: That would be impeaching George W. Bush, twice. Obviously, Nadler meant to say Donald Trump, not that he can remember what decade it is. But what he meant to say is not really a consolation for Democrats watching at home. The problem here is that Jerry Nadler and Carolyn Maloney … neither of these candidates have anything to say.”

“What’s interesting is what Carolyn Maloney didn’t mention as a top priority, and that would be the economy, inflation. And it’s interesting because every poll taken shows that inflation is the number one issue that actual Americans care about. So, why wouldn’t Carolyn Maloney, who is a politician after all, can probably read a poll, why would she not include inflation? Well, it’s possible she’s not aware it’s happening.”

“So, these are the issues that the leaders of the Democratic party and the party’s donors, many of them in San Francisco and New York, care about. They don’t care about inflation because they’re rich and it doesn’t affect them. In other words, they don’t care about you at all. And by the way, this isn’t just true of longstanding establishment figures in the Democratic party like Jerry Nadler and Carolyn Maloney, it’s everywhere. It’s endemic, it’s in the fabric of the party itself. Even people who want to join the club repeat the same lines.”

“So, no wonder Democrats are unpopular. They have nothing to offer. They haven’t updated their files. They believe it’s 2005. You see this in foreign policy particularly. They are living in their heads in a world in which the US wields the world’s most powerful military backed by the world’s strongest economy and can do whatever it wants just by telling other people to obey. So, like Joe Biden, you just tell Russia ‘don’t invade Ukraine!’, and of course it won’t, we’re America. You just let China know that we back Taiwan and the entire 75-year-old dispute over that island will be settles forever. They really believe that. They have no idea of this country’s relative place in the world order because they don’t know anything about reality as it stands right now.”

“How out of touch are they? Well, the Democratic party’s main ‘radical’ right now is Sandy Cortez of Westchester. How radical is Sandy Cortez? Well, she spends her days defending the ‘intel’ agencies and neocon foreign policy, and the big banks. So, if you’re ‘revolutionaries’ are reading scripts written by the World Economic Forum, maybe they’re not actually very revolutionary. Maybe they’re defending the status quo, and that’s exactly what they’re doing, and they’re doing it because they have no other plan. The sad truth is the people who run the Democratic party have just given up. They’ve given up on the country and given up on the people who live here.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments:

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending