Think Schools Should be Open? Guess you are a White Supremacist. ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

News

Think Schools Should be Open? Guess you are a White Supremacist.

Published

on

Reopening schools is based in White Supremacy? As schools around the country and specifically in blue states struggle to re-open or stay open this is what parents are up against. Many students haven’t seen the inside of a classroom in almost a year.  We know that school age children, especially elementary age students are at extremely low risk from COVID. Even with the science on the side of opening schools, teachers unions around the country are refusing to teach in-person.

The students are being hurt and the teachers unions don’t seem to care.

The CDC reported that there has been an increase of about 24-31% in mental health related emergency room visits by young adults and children.

More than three million adolescents aged 12-17 reported at least one major depressive episode in the last year along.

With all of the information about the harm virtual learning has had on students how do the union leaders react?  They accuse parents of being white supremacists for wanting schools open.

Last week, Jason Rantz posted the following video of a zoom call with the Washington State Teachers Union president. In it, Washington State Teachers Union president says reopening schools is an example of “white supremacy”, concern over health or suicide risk is “white privilege”.

Watch the video below to hear what the head of  this teachers union really thinks about parents concerns.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



News

America is in decline because voters asked for it

Published

on

American voters have placed in office many people whose allegiance is to woke ideology instead of the public good. In many cases, these elected officials support policies that clearly are harmful to their constituents and to the nation.

Why would anyone knowingly vote for politicians who embrace policies that cause great harm? New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg is a case in point. DA Bragg doesn’t like to prosecute felons. Instead, bad actors are released immediately without bail. Bragg is not an accident. New Yorkers elected him.

President Joe Biden has allowed millions of unvetted immigrants to enter the country causing untold disruption in our cities and the threat of terrorism. Instead of deporting people who violate federal law by coming into the US illegally, we give them free rent, free food, free cell phones, free credit cards, free medical care, free child care. The same president has destroyed our energy independence, caused runaway inflation, and undermined our military readiness. Despite these misdeeds, millions of voters claim he is doing a good job and want him to run again in 2024.

Biden is using the legal system against his Republican adversary, Donald Trump, to deny him the right of due process, to confiscate his wealth, and to impose a lengthy jail sentence. “The law is being used to punish people you don’t like politically,” said Sean Hannity. Yet millions of voters continue to support Joe Biden.

These outrageous situations can be chalked up to an unconscious electorate. They voted for all these problems. The people of New York City are fed up with mounting crime. Yet they voted for Alvin Bragg, who is contributing to the crime problem by refusing to put offenders behind bars.

I am not describing a stupid electorate. Many of the voters who elect unfit politicians are highly educated. Mark Levin explains this phenomenon in American Marxism. He addresses the question that has stumped me for years: Why is it that so many intelligent, well-educated, affluent people in urban centers like New York and San Francisco have been seduced by the Left? Levin’s answer: “They are lured by the false hopes and promises of urban transformation and the criticisms of the existing society.”

When it comes to politics, many of our citizens have a myopic, under-informed viewpoint. They see themselves as compassionate people who want to help the disadvantaged. If they are white, they have been told that the white patriarchy oppresses blacks and other minorities. As a result, they may feel guilty about their own success. When it comes to immigration, they want to open our doors to anyone who wants to enter the country. Why? Because people in other parts of the world are suffering and liberals believe that we have a moral duty to help them.

What they are missing is that leftist policies have consequences. Bringing in millions of Stone Age people from the Middle East, for example, makes the US vulnerable to the disruption and violence that are tearing Europe apart.

An excellent analogy can be found in the game of chess. Amateur players look at the chessboard and only perceive the board as it exists right in front of them. They neither understand nor take responsibility for the consequences of their moves. Experienced chess players can see the board three to four moves ahead. They are aware that whatever move they make will entail consequences.

We have millions of American voters who resemble amateur chess players. They are completely oblivious to the consequences of their political choices. That is why California has turned from a garden in to a hellhole. The liberals who run the legislature in Sacramento are falling all over each other in the rush to provide free healthcare, free education, and welfare payments to illegal immigrants. But what about the consequences? Who will pay for all the freebies? What will happen to civil order and public safety when the government is no longer able to maintain the rule of law? No one wants to take responsibility for the unpleasant consequences of the leftist agenda.

Voting is no longer looked upon as a responsibility. “Elections are not held just for social participation,” said economist Thomas Sowell. “They’re not held just to vet our emotions. They’re held to elect people who will hold our lives and the lives of our loved ones in their hands, as well as the fate of the entire nation. To go out as if we’re voting for homecoming queen is madness!”

Sowell has suggested that for people who refuse to take the time to study the issues and candidates, “their most patriotic act would be to stay home on election day, rather than vote on the basis of their whims or their emotions, which is really playing Russian roulette with the history of the country.”

More than anything, we need informed voters who can opt for responsible candidates.

Ed Brodow is a conservative political commentator and author of two No. 1 Amazon Best Sellers, AMERICA ON ITS KNEES: The Cost of Replacing Trump with Biden, and THE WAR ON WHITES: How Hating White People Became the New National Sport.

Continue Reading

News

The Stalinist Vendetta Against Donald Trump

Published

on

Whenever the Democrats are in power, they destroy everything they get their hands on. As Deroy Murdock said in the New York Post, Democrats are “wreaking havoc, division, and devastation.” No one exemplifies this better, or should I say worse, than New York State Attorney General Letitia James, a deranged racist who has achieved notoriety by basing her political career on an outlandish campaign to get Donald Trump.

Ms. James gives fiery speeches in which she accuses Trump of every conceivable wrongdoing under the sun. Her words and behavior reek of uncontrollable anger. James is unabashedly racist and sexist. The country is “too male, too pale, and too stale,” she said, exposing her dislike of men and white people.

James’ behavior, by itself, is not unusual for those afflicted with Trump Derangement Syndrome. What makes James a standout is that she has used her office to bring Trump to within a hair’s breadth of financial and political ruin. “This is a variation of Stalin and Beria in the 1930s,” said attorney Alan Dershowitz, “when the head of the KGB says to Stalin, ‘Show me the man, I’ll find you the crime.’ This is show me the man—Donald Trump—and we’ll find you the fraud even if there was no harm.”

The absurdity of Ms. James’ fraud case against Trump is that there is no crime and no victim. No one has been harmed. It is a weaponization of the legal system for political ends. As Shark Tank investor Kevin O’Leary has observed, what Trump is alleged to have done—overvalued his real estate properties when applying for a bank loan—is normal business practice all over the globe. The bank made money and is anxious to do business with him again.

Obviously, Ms. James has no knowledge of what goes on in the real world. All she cares about is taking down a former president. “Is there anybody out there who believes that this case would have been brought if Donald Trump were not the leading candidate to run against Joe Biden?” said Alan Dershowitz. “This is selective prosecution and it’s wrong.”

James managed to find a judge who is crazy enough to hit Trump with a whopping $460-million fine, an amount greater than the gross national product of some countries. “The damages, like the judge, are daft and asinine,” said news commentator Gregg Jarrett. “Judge Engoron wore his anti-Trump bias on his sleeve, arrogant, smug, obtuse.” Mark Levin reminds us that the damages are in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of unreasonable fines and punishments. Hopefully Judge Engoron’s judgment will be reversed on appeal.

James doesn’t seem to care that she is destroying New York’s business future in the bargain.  Her case means that New York’s legal and financial integrity are shattered. “Capital comes to America because of the stability of the justice system,” said Kevin O’Leary. “Seizing assets is what happens in Venezuela. It doesn’t happen in New York.” Prominent investors have already signaled their intent to stop doing business in the city.

“If this decision stands,” said Trump attorney Alina Habba, “it will serve as a signal to every single American that New York is no longer open for business.” None of that matters to James, who is delighted to turn our nation into a banana republic. “The Democrats are at a no-holds-barred time to unleash everything on Trump no matter how much we undermine the rule of law,” said writer Doug TenNapel. “They’re going for broke because they’re going to lose everything if Trump wins.”

“They hate Trump, they can’t stand the guy,” said Maria Bartiromo on Fox Business. “They want to stop him from becoming president again and they’re gonna stoop to whatever level it takes.”

The irony is that James’ assault may push Trump over the top. Many Trump critics are defending him against the Democrats in response to James’ fraud case. By the way, when Trump is elected, he will make all that money back.

What have we learned from this? That someone with Trump’s extraordinary accomplishments can be brought down by such a vile and inconsequential person as Letitia James. But Trump is a survivor. I’m looking forward to James’ reaction when Trump wins the election in November. As her head explodes, we will discover there is nothing inside but anger and vindictiveness.

Ed Brodow is a conservative political commentator and author of two No. 1 Amazon Best Sellers, AMERICA ON ITS KNEES: The Cost of Replacing Trump with Biden, and THE WAR ON WHITES: How Hating White People Became the New National Sport.

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending