The Leftist Hoax Machine Cranked Up During Trump’s Presidency ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Business

The Leftist Hoax Machine Cranked Up During Trump’s Presidency

No amount of Democrat hoaxes will deter our ultimate progression to the truth.

Published

on

The Democrats, for the most part, seek to tear down our republic and replace it with socialism, which is one step removed from communism. The Democrats have become a threat to our civilization and to the free world. Of note, the launch of the Mueller Investigation was a brazen effort to subvert democracy.

For two+ years, Robert Mueller and 14 angry Democrats explored every aspect of Donald Trump’s candidacy and subsequent presidency. They collected more than 1,500,000 documents, they spent nearly $32 million, and they subpoenaed more than 500 witnesses.

Mueller’s committee grilled members of Trump’s staff, in some cases multiple times and in some cases for as much as 30 hours. No one in the history of the United States and, quite possibly, in the history of the world, had ever been as thoroughly put under the microscope in such a concentrated and concerted manner as Donald Trump.

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Tucker: Because of Joe Biden, it’s that simple

Nothing Times Nothing

The conclusion culminated in a bumbling Robert Mueller who testified that he could not find a shred of evidence that Trump colluded with Russia or for that matter with anybody. Mueller’s lead attorney was Andrew Weissmann, described by the Right as a pitbull prosecutor, whose career-long prosecutorial misconduct and lack of ethics was roundly exposed years earlier by author Sidney Powell in her book Licensed to Lie.

Weissmann was vehemently seeking to find anything to pin on Trump, but could not. Weissmann had to settle for some process crimes and perjury traps on Trump related advisors and associates, each of whom had zero to do with Russian collusion. All the while, Trump knew he was innocent. Yes, he ranted and raved, and lamented about the committee. He asked people if he could prevent this or that from happening.

In the end, Trump committed no obstruction, whatsoever: Not a single witness who was summoned was prevented from testifying in front of Mueller’s group. Not a single document was withheld by the Trump Whitehouse. Not a single executive privilege was invoked. Case closed. End of story, or it should be.

On Deck, The Next Hoax

A few weeks after the Mueller testimony, a phony Ukraine quid pro quo case emerged, backed by George Soros funds. The Ukraine controversy was based on nothing, as was the Russia hoax. The Democrat party, along with its liberal media and leftists cabal, perpetrated hoax after hoax after hoax, whether it was Russian collusion, the Japanese Koi fish pond, the Covington Catholic kids, the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh, the “attack” on Jussie Smollett, and the Ukraine “quid pro quo.” There is nothing behind any of these claims. Nada. Concurrently, the record is beginning to reveal that Obama, Biden, and Clinton were involved in virtually non-stop quid pro quo.

Moving right along… As everyone now has learned, the Department of Justice probe into the origins of Russiagate has turned into a criminal investigation of the investigators. On cue, CNN and MSNBC are leading the chorus of spinmeisters alleging that the investigation is “Trump’s revenge” and purely political. It is not. Voluminous evidence suggests that serious crimes were committed by high-ranking officials across a broad swath of government agencies.

No amount of leftist spin and no new round of Democrat hoaxes will deter the ultimate progression to the truth. Still, if John Durham ever presents solid evidence of Deep State malfeasance, and perhaps treason, on cue the Left will attack him personally and will seek to minimize the value of the evidence. Their efforts will fail to persuade anyone but zealot leftists, of which there are many.

Lawless and Socialist

Impeachment #1 was a sham, and impeachment #2 follows suit. If Trump had not been the 45th president, and it had been Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio elected, or for that matter, third party-candidate Jill Stein, the Democrats would have persecuted that person, not as easily because no one in high office was as crude as Donald Trump. Nevertheless, nobody would be able to hold the office of president unscathed.

Too many people on the Left reside in a liberal media bubble and never consider anything but the columns and opinions and made-up fantasy created by The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, and everyplace else that is in on the game.

Trump is a highly flawed man with many of the personality disorders that numerous pundits have ascribed to him. His tweet attacks on others were juvenile, and many of his tweets were cringe-worthy. He inconsistently upheld the dignity of the office. That did not make him any less concerned about America, and any less effective in accomplishing a great deal during his four years.

– – – – –

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.


Jeff Davidson is the world's only holder of the title "The Work-Life Balance Expert®" as awarded by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He is the premier thought leader on work-life balance, integration, and harmony. Jeff speaks to organizations that seek to enhance their overall productivity by improving the effectiveness of their people. He is the author of Breathing Space, Simpler Living, Dial it Down, and Everyday Project Management. Visit www.BreathingSpace.com for more information on Jeff's keynote speeches and seminars, including: Managing the Pace with Grace® * Achieving Work-Life Balance™ * Managing Information and Communication Overload®



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Business

Pandora Papers, a box of trouble for whom?

Published

on

Pandoras box seems to be a well-known metaphor in today’s culture. It is often used to represent unknowingly opening a box of wop-ass. The Greek origins are a little more complex.  Pandora was the first human woman, a gift from the gods. She was made from earth to be lovely as a goddess. With the gift of speech to tell lies, and the mind and nature of a treacherous dog. She was given a golden crown of animals and sea creatures. Pandora was blessed with grace, desire and caring to weaken her limbs.

Pandora was the first woman to live among mortal men, first bride and great misery. She was destined to live with men in times of plenty and to desert them in hard times.  Her name means both “she who gives all gifts” and “she who was given all gifts”. In the mythology she opened a jar that belonged to her husband that contained every misery that affects man to today, but managed to close it before hope was able to escape the jar.

Which brings us to the latest document leak from the International Consortium of investigative Journalists or ICIJ. This is the latest of leaks following the Panama papers and the Paradise papers. ICIJ claims this is the largest leak of tax haven information ever. The 11.9 million financial records include information on 330 politicians and high level leaders, including 35 country leaders. For two years over 600 journalists from 117 countries helped to follow up leads exposed by the leak.

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Tucker: Because of Joe Biden, it’s that simple

Top leaders with homes in Malibu, Monti Carlo, and high rise towers in Dubai. Investments in sugar plantations, polluting factories, and even a hospital. Secret companies and Trusts to hide assets from taxes and their people. ICIJ likes to point out that this money could have been used to help build roads, hospitals, and schools. They also imply the money comes from ill-gotten gains. Pointing out that hiding money is also used during drug smuggling, human trafficking, bribery, and international terrorism.

In an effort to seem like actual investigative journalists they do mention that nothing they were fed was illegal.  They failed to mention that the tax regulations in every one of the countries involved are written by the rich themselves. Mostly by those not uncovered by the Pandora Papers. Something the 600 seemed to have over looked during their two year investigation is any tax avoidance from the United States. Funny thing that.

To find out why you need to look at who the International Consortium of investigative Journalists is and who finances them. It turns out the group was founded in 1997, they claim to take no public funds only donations. Their largest donors happen to be Soros, thru the The Open Society Foundation. Now needless to say Soros is not going to admit what each one of these people did to stop his march towards one world government headed by Soros and company, but we can speculate.

Tony Blair, supported the American action in Afghanistan. King Abdullanh met with and supported Israel. Vladimir Putin would rather not have a one world government telling him how to run Russia. Shakira no stranger to wokeness had the gall to disagree with the Conovirus imprisonment and demanded children be let outside into the sun and air. You can bet that each one of the targets of this dump had somehow displeased those supporting the great reset.

Each one of these thought they had found a beautiful tax haven not knowing it was she who gives all gifts and conversely she who is given all gifts. By selectively revealing that it is worthwhile to spend money to hide income from those who did not earn it is telling. Besides highlighting that taxes are too high for the services provided. Telling that not one American is mentioned. Telling that the “journalists” didn’t discover how politicians in government get rich on civil service salaries. Not one mention of the heads of NGO’s (non-governmental agencies) have found that the poor are very very good for them. How about a peek into how many of the 1.5 million tax exempt organizations in America are just a tax dodge.

We will wait with the patience of Job for the International Consortium of investigative Journalists to do some real investigating.

Continue Reading

Business

The People Who Size You up Instantly

Beware of people who conveniently assess what you need, while missing the boat about their own needs

Published

on

I went to a social gathering and, arriving early, few others had arrived. So I took out my notepad and pen, and leisurely started making notes. A lady who saw me, asked what I was writing, which, of course, could be either a friendly way to start a conversation, or intrusive, depending on your point of view. I took it as the former, and shared with her my predisposition to take notes outside of my office where I generate ideas that don’t readily emerge at my desk.

Apparently my explanation was not satisfactory for her. In rapid succession she told me, ‘You need to get a drink. (Actually, I don’t drink.) You should to stop making notes. You ought to relax. (Making notes is relaxing to me.) You need to get a life.’

Paradoxically, I am the author of the books, Breathing Space and Simpler Living, and the audiobook, Get a Life. I also own the registered trademarks for the programs, Relaxing at High Speed and Managing the Pace With Grace. I have delivered 1,060 lectures on these topics for three decades.

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Tucker: Because of Joe Biden, it’s that simple

Quick and Wrong

It’s beyond strange when someone at a social gathering, in such short order, will assess what I need to do, with one pronouncement after another. When told that I needed to relax, I said, “If I was any more relaxed, I’d fall asleep.”

I came away from that experience recognizing that people who will readily tell you what you need are the ones who need what they’re telling you. You might have noticed a somewhat similar phenomenon in the workplace.

Suppose you work in a company that is crowded, noisy, and busy almost all the time. However, in your own office or cubicle, whichever the case might be, you’re able to maintain order.

Perhaps you have installed some sound barriers, if that is appropriate, and have crafted a workspace where you can get things done. People who walk by notice that your office equipment, resources, and possessions are organized. Guess what? Some office mates won’t tell you this, but they are uncomfortable with your organizing skills.

If they could find a simple way to articulate it, they would tell you, “Loosen up.” You don’t need to be so neat and orderly.” Why are they itching to tell you this? Because your level of organization makes them feel inadequate.

Be Like Me, I’ll Feel Better

Much like the lady at the social gathering, who told me ‘what I needed,’ some people in your immediate environment, in observing your capacity for taking charge of your space, and perhaps noting your higher-than-average level of productivity, would rather that you acted and proceeded in a different way. You might not hear that from them, but that is some might be thinking.

Beware of those people who so conveniently assess what you need, while completely missing the boat about their own needs. They fail to realize that what they’re telling you, is probably what they need to address for themselves.

– – – – –

 

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending

Politicrossing
 
Send this to a friend