The curious case of Ray Epps and the January 6 committee ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Tucker Carlson

The curious case of Ray Epps and the January 6 committee

The one person caught repeatedly urging people into the capitol as early as January 5 is the one person of all of the January 6 riot participants that the New York Times just happens to write this ultra-sympathetic puff piece for.

Published

on

Tucker interviews Darren Beattie of Revolver News about the role of Ray Epps on January 6. Highlights include:

“As part of its coverage last summer the Times published a video documentary, in which the Times reported that one man was actually caught on camera planning an insurrection, encouraging a breach of the capitol complex. That man’s name is Ray Epps. Now, the New York Times noted that Epps was videotaped on both January 5 and January 6, urging protesters to storm the capitol.”

“Shortly after that video surfaced. the FBI placed Ray Epps on a list of people wanted for questioning. They released it to the public, and you can understand why they did that. According to the Justice Department, what Ray Epps did on that video is a federal crime. In fact, the Biden administration has charged several people with seditious conspiracy for doing precisely what you just saw Ray Epps do, urging others to enter the capitol complex on January 6.”

“It’s amazing how little democrats want to hear about this. Again, Nancy Pelosi and Liz Cheney have spent the last year staging an investigation at great expense, and then a series of public show trials, arresting people in their homes, supposedly designed to discover how and why January 6 happened.”

“But they remain curiously uninterested in the Epps case. We’ve got what seems like an actual insurrectionist on tape, but they don’t want to talk about it, and they definitely don’t want you to talk about it or ask any questions. As if to prove that point, the New York Times just ran a piece explaining that when you ask questions about Ray Epps, you are committing a moral crime, maybe even helping Putin.”

“This is highly strange, and if you’re going to spend more than a year looking into January 6 and you ignore this, then it’s more than strange. It’s an indictment of your motives.”

“The one person caught repeatedly urging people into the capitol as early as January 5 is the one person of all of the January 6 riot participants that the New York Times just happens to write this ultra-sympathetic puff piece for. It’s quite remarkable, and to look at the piece itself, there’s some real glaring omissions from a journalistic standpoint.”

“Epps travels all the way from Arizona to DC. This big Trump supporter, and he doesn’t even attend the speech? Instead, he fixates on this bizarre mission to get everyone to go into the capitol, and by the way, he just happens to be hanging out right by the initial breach point near the peace monument on the west side of the capitol, before the ‘proud boys’ even get there?”

“This is so dirty, Ray Epps behavior is so egregious that he was one of the first 20 on the FBI most wanted list. He was featured as a star in the New York Times’ own documentary on January 6, and now he’s unarrested, unindicted, and he’s the only January 6 rioter … the New York Times is writing puff pieces about. He’s the smoking gun of the entire fedsurrection.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments:

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Tucker Carlson

Tucker: This is a grotesque and filthy lie

Virtually everything NBC ‘news’ has told you about this shooting in Colorado is not only wrong, it is the opposite of the truth.

Published

on

Tucker looks at NBC’s and CNN’s continued coverage of the recent shooting in Colorado now that the shooter has claimed to be non-binary.

As you probably already expect, they’re still denying it and blaming people who oppose mutilating children, as if that had anything to do with it.

Highlights include:

“If you’ve been watching the ‘news’ recently, the one thing you know for certain about the accused gunman in the massacre in Colorado over the weekend is that he was a ‘crazed, right-wing, anti-trans extremist.”

“He did that because he was taught by right-wing media outlets to despise and fear the non-binary community.”

“Was her reporting right? Well, not entirely. Do you remember when Brandy Zadrozny told you several hundred times that the accused shooter, Anderson Lee Aldrich, was inspired by hatred for the non-binary community that he learned on this show, do you remember that? Well, actually, it turns out, we discovered last night, that Anderson Lee Aldrich is … drumroll, please … part of the non-binary community. He doesn’t hate them, he is one.”

“What it means is that virtually everything NBC ‘news’ has told you about this shooting in Colorado is not only wrong, it is the opposite of the truth. It is all a grotesque and filthy lie. It wasn’t ‘news reporting,’ it turns out to be the most transparent sort of political propaganda, and for once they have been busted flat out, in public, trying to sell political propaganda to an unsuspecting public under the guise of ‘news.’”

“It turns out it’s the town’s fault, too, because there are a lot of Christians, everybody knows, in Colorado Springs, so, gay people feel terrified there because Christians are dangerous. And all these terrified gay people were huddled together for safety when this Fox News-addled anti-trans bigot walked in and started shooting them for being transfolk.”

“Well, the only problem is, not all of the victims were gay. One of them, at least one of them, was at the club with his girlfriend. Details, details.”

“So, if you’re against genital mutilation of children or bringing toddlers to drag shows, you’re against the lgbtq community. Well, of course, that’s insane. There’s nothing anti-gay about that. Most gay people aren’t in favor of genital mutilation or bringing toddlers to drag shows. There’s nothing wrong with those opinions. They’re the right opinions, and all decent people understand that. What’s indecent, what is wrong, is lying about a mass shooting, which NBC did.”-

Watch the video below and you know what to do after that:

Continue Reading

Tucker Carlson

Know your pathetic leftist jargon: ‘Stochastic Terrorism’ in Colorado Springs

The Left is sexualizing children … and as many others as they can … because they embrace sexual perversion.

Published

on

Tucker calls out some people supporting and committing sexual mutilation of children and child pornography in the media. Highlights include:

“The Second Amendment is not the freedom that threatens the people in charge the most. No, that would be the First Amendment, which is your right to say what you sincerely believe. That is the right, the first in our Bill of Rights that terrifies them the most. Your words are a greater threat than any firearm. They must censor you, or else they lose power, it is that simple.”

“So, these horrifying murders in Colorado over the weekend quickly became a pretext for yet more censorship of your speech. You are responsible for this, they told you, because you said the wrong things. You are guilty of “stochastic terrorism”, inspiring violence by your beliefs. Anderson Lee Aldrich committed mass murder because you complained about the sexualizing of children.”

“When you point out the truth indisputably and the truth is that some adults in this country, apparently a growing number, have a deeply unhealthy fixation on the sexuality of children, when you say that out loud, you get people killed.”

“Children’s Hospital in Boston, one of the most famous hospitals in the world, has admitted to performing double mastectomies on children for no medical reason at all. There is no scientific justification for sexually mutilating kids. They are not doing it for a scientifically defensible reason, they are doing it because they believe in a very specific religious ideology.”

“That’s true.”

“Is pointing that out an attack on gay people? Of course it is not an attack on gay people. It has nothing to do with gay people. It has to do with sexually mutilating children, which is wrong, period. It should be a crime, period. And yet, suddenly it’s very common.”

“’It certainly is happening. I think we’ve had more than 10 patients who have had chest surgery under 18 (as young as 15) and bottom surgery (17).'”

“That’s the sexual mutilation of children for no medical or scientific reason simply because right now it is fashionable and consistent with a cult that has taken over a lot of the leadership of this country. But the fact remains, children are being destroyed by this. It should be a crime, the people who commit it should be in jail. But it’s not just the sexual multiation of children in ‘hospitals.'”

“This is part of a larger trend, and the trend is this: Adults crossing the line…into deep involvement with the sexuality of children. That has always been, and must in a civilized society always be the most forbidden thing. It’s considered unacceptable even among prison inmates, but now it seems to be growing in its prevalence. ”

Watch the video below and so on.

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending