The Buffalo shooting: Biden mindlessly blames his political enemies ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Tucker Carlson

The Buffalo shooting: Biden mindlessly blames his political enemies

Joe is a divisive partisan bureaucrat bent on destroying America.

Published

on

Tucker looks at the democrat party’s reaction the the shooting in Buffalo last Saturday, and how their immigration policies may eventually backfire. Highlight’s include:

“On Saturday, Peyton Gendron, as you know, finally did what he said he would do. He committed mass murder, he opened fire on a crowd of strangers in a Buffalo supermarket. He killed ten of them.”

“So, how did the adults around him let this happen? In a country with functioning leadership, we would be asking that question. The signs of mental illness were certainly there. The people in charge missed those signs, or didn’t take them seriously enough, weren’t paying close enough attention.”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Tucker: Where’s the Christian concern?

“In any case, they didn’t fix it, they let a killer slip through. So, what did they do wrong with Peyton Gendron, and how can we learn from it?”

“But that’s not at all what our leaders are asking tonight, hardly. Instead, they’re asking the only question that ever occurs to them: How exactly can I benefit from this? How can I leverage this tragedy to my advantage? How can other people’s suffering make me more powerful? It didn’t take Joe Biden to find a way.”

“January 6th and the Buffalo massacre. So, how is a political protest at the capitol related to a murder spree by a demented teenager in New York state over the weekend. What do those two events have in common, and who exactly are these unnamed ‘heads of state’ who are connecting this unconnected events in conversations with Joe Biden?”

“You may have wondered that, but don’t ask, because it’s not meant to be asked. It is instead a dream sequence, it’s a rhetorical device meant to connect everything that might challenge Joe Biden and bunch all of these things together in the same repulsive moral category.”

“The relentless exploitation of the internet to recruit and mobilize terrorism, okay. But can anyone show, has anyone ever shown that this specific case, Peyton Gendron, was ‘recruited and mobilized by the internet’?”

“Well, no, in fact. By his own account, he was mentally ill, he snapped. He’d been planning this for a long time, he did what his diseased brain commanded him to do. The internet did not make him do it, he did it himself. But even if Gendron had been ‘radicalized’ by what he’d read on the internet, what then, exactly? Many have been radicalized by what they’ve read.”

“Should we ban all books, all internet sites that ‘radicalize’ people? What exactly is Joe Biden saying here? Well, he’s saying that thanks to what happened in Buffalo over the weekend, you no longer have any any rights at all, including the most basic, which is to read what you want. After nullifying the First Amendment, Joe Biden moved to the Second Amendment.”

“So, because a mentally ill 18-year-old used a specific rifle to commit these crimes, you can’t have that rifle. Now, Joe Biden’s bodyguards can have that rifle, so can Nancy Pelosi’s, and of course they do. In fact, you pay for it all, But, they’re important, and you’re not, so you can’t.”

“So, because the people in charge failed to protect shoppers in Buffalo, you’re not allowed to defend your family, despite the fact you may believe your family is every bit as important as Joe Biden and his family or Nancy Pelosi and her family. But they’re not as important, so we’re going to defund the police and disarm you. That’s how it works now, sorry. And then Joe Biden got to the main point of his speech, which is that people who criticize his immigration policies are responsible for the violence you saw in Buffalo.”

“So, you lock the country down, lock kids out of their schools for two years, force them to get ‘educated’ on the internet, but it’s someone else’s fault that they’re ‘alienated.'”

“They’ve been hearing about the ‘great replacement theory.’ You’ve heard a lot about the ‘great replacement theory’ recently, it’s everywhere in the last two days, and we’re still not sure exactly what it is. Here’s what we do know for a fact. There’s a strong political component to the democratic party’s immigration policy. We’re not guessing this, we know this, and we know it because they have said so. They’ve written books on it. They say it out loud, ‘we’re doing this because it helps us to win elections.'”

“It’s something they’ve gloated about again and again and again and we think that’s wrong.”

“Maybe the funniest part is, they might not be right. The democratic party has decided that, rather than convince you, people who were born here, that their policies are helping you and making the country better and stronger, they will change the electorate.”

“But the funniest part is, they may be wrong, actually. Judging by recent polling, it turns out your average Salvadoran landscaper’s politics are a lot closer to Donald Trump’s than they are to Joe Biden’s and Nancy Pelosi’s.”

“But that’s not even the point.”

Watch as your democrat friends completely miss the hilarity of Joe Biden calling out spreading lies and violence for political power and profit, and leave us a comment.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Tucker Carlson

Tucker: Where’s the Christian concern?

I’m only suggesting that one factor that Christians use to assess the behavior of their government and other governments ought to be the treatment of Christians. It ought to be, why is it not?

Published

on

Tucker questions why American churches seem to have little concern for or knowledge of what’s happening to their fellow Christians around the world. Highlights include:

“Christians can absolutely get it wrong, and do. They can follow the wrong path, they can be mistaken, they can be silly and profane, they can commit the worst sins imaginable, but the one thing they cannot do is be afraid, period. And so, boldness… is not just this added extra, it’s a baseline requirement for following the gospel, and if you’re not doing that, you’re not doing it right. So, that’s the first thing, don’t be afraid. The second thing I notice in reading Paul’s letters is his deep concern for his fellow Christians.”

“I’m only suggesting that one factor that Christians use to assess the behavior of their government and other governments ought to be the treatment of Christians. It ought to be, why is it not?”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Indictment of the Democrats

“We’re funding the Islamists who are killing the Christians – did anyone know that? No, of course not, churches never talk about it, that’s true. Are we for that? I’m not for that… Why doesn’t somebody stand up and say, ‘Wait a second, we’re funding the killing of Christians? No, I’m a Christian, I’m against that.”

“The conflict between Russia and Ukraine? Super complicated. I don’t think there’s an easy answer, I don’t think there’s a ‘good guy’ and a ‘bad guy’… and the more I learn about it, the more I’m confused. I’m certainly not endorsing Russia… But, one of the guides that we as Christians should use to assess that situation is, how do Christians fare in those countries? It’s totally legitimate to ask that question. Is it easier to be a Christian in Russia or Ukraine?”

“One of those countries just arrested a bunch of priests and shut down churches with political police and the army. It wasn’t Russia. I raised that question at a Christian gathering, people scowled at me. Really? They’re arresting priests? I don’t need to know more.”

You can find the link to the video below and give us your thoughts in the comments.

Continue Reading

Tucker Carlson

Tucker: Viktor Orbán on Ukraine, Russia and Hungary

If any western country would send any boots on the ground, that would mean a direct war between the west and Russia.

Published

on

Tucker and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán talk about the war in Ukraine, how Americans are being lied to about it, and about Hungary’s success as a nation. Highlights include:

“As the war in Ukraine completely reshuffles the world order and threatens to destroy human civilization, it’s striking just how little information Americans are receiving about what happens there. The nation of Hungary shares a border with Ukraine. Its leader, Viktor Orbán, the nation’s longest serving Prime Minister, has been dealing with the Russians all of his life. He grew up under Russian occupation. As a young man, he was arrested and thrown in to jail by Russian-backed police for his efforts to liberate the country. In his Prime Ministry, he’s dealt regularly with Vladimir Putin, whose nation supplies Hungary with most of its energy. Viktor Orbán understands Russian and Ukraine. So, two years after we last spoke to him, we returned to Hungry to sit down with Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and ask him, what exactly is happening in Ukraine right now?

“When you speak on politics in Russian … the number one issue, how to keep together the country… Freedom is just another issue, second, third, whatever. First, keep the country together, and that’s generated a different kind of culture and understanding of politics. That’s creating a kind of military approach, like they have.”

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Tucker: Where’s the Christian concern?

“They will not kill their leader, they will never give it up, they will keep together the country [sic] and they will defend it. We finance more, they will invest more. If we send more technical equipment, they will produce more. So, don’t misunderstand the Russians.

“Now, Putin is in power for long, long years [sic]. We forgot about how dangerous when there is no strong leadership or interregnum in Russian. The interregnum is the worst case possible… If this is the goal, it’s a mistake. It’s more than dangerous.

“If any western country would send any boots on the ground, that would mean a direct war between the west and Russia, and we are in a third world war immediately, so it’s a very dangerous moment now.

“Ideology is a very difficult thing, because it has an exclusivity. So, when the liberal says that this is the interpretation of society, it means that this is the only way to interpret a society. If you do differently, you cannot be a good man. So, we have another interpretation, we have a Christian and national, more traditional interpretation of human being and society, but they can’t accept it because it’s different.

“If you ask anybody on the street that any Hungarian leader who is elected freely can be a puppet of Putin or the Russians, they say it’s a joke, it’s impossible, because we are a sovereign country, and even to the Russians we deliver many times that we are sovereign.”

You can find the video link below and give us your thoughts in the comments.

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending