The Buffalo shooting: Biden mindlessly blames his political enemies ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Tucker Carlson

The Buffalo shooting: Biden mindlessly blames his political enemies

Joe is a divisive partisan bureaucrat bent on destroying America.

Published

on

Tucker looks at the democrat party’s reaction the the shooting in Buffalo last Saturday, and how their immigration policies may eventually backfire. Highlight’s include:

“On Saturday, Peyton Gendron, as you know, finally did what he said he would do. He committed mass murder, he opened fire on a crowd of strangers in a Buffalo supermarket. He killed ten of them.”

“So, how did the adults around him let this happen? In a country with functioning leadership, we would be asking that question. The signs of mental illness were certainly there. The people in charge missed those signs, or didn’t take them seriously enough, weren’t paying close enough attention.”

“In any case, they didn’t fix it, they let a killer slip through. So, what did they do wrong with Peyton Gendron, and how can we learn from it?”

“But that’s not at all what our leaders are asking tonight, hardly. Instead, they’re asking the only question that ever occurs to them: How exactly can I benefit from this? How can I leverage this tragedy to my advantage? How can other people’s suffering make me more powerful? It didn’t take Joe Biden to find a way.”

“January 6th and the Buffalo massacre. So, how is a political protest at the capitol related to a murder spree by a demented teenager in New York state over the weekend. What do those two events have in common, and who exactly are these unnamed ‘heads of state’ who are connecting this unconnected events in conversations with Joe Biden?”

“You may have wondered that, but don’t ask, because it’s not meant to be asked. It is instead a dream sequence, it’s a rhetorical device meant to connect everything that might challenge Joe Biden and bunch all of these things together in the same repulsive moral category.”

“The relentless exploitation of the internet to recruit and mobilize terrorism, okay. But can anyone show, has anyone ever shown that this specific case, Peyton Gendron, was ‘recruited and mobilized by the internet’?”

“Well, no, in fact. By his own account, he was mentally ill, he snapped. He’d been planning this for a long time, he did what his diseased brain commanded him to do. The internet did not make him do it, he did it himself. But even if Gendron had been ‘radicalized’ by what he’d read on the internet, what then, exactly? Many have been radicalized by what they’ve read.”

“Should we ban all books, all internet sites that ‘radicalize’ people? What exactly is Joe Biden saying here? Well, he’s saying that thanks to what happened in Buffalo over the weekend, you no longer have any any rights at all, including the most basic, which is to read what you want. After nullifying the First Amendment, Joe Biden moved to the Second Amendment.”

“So, because a mentally ill 18-year-old used a specific rifle to commit these crimes, you can’t have that rifle. Now, Joe Biden’s bodyguards can have that rifle, so can Nancy Pelosi’s, and of course they do. In fact, you pay for it all, But, they’re important, and you’re not, so you can’t.”

“So, because the people in charge failed to protect shoppers in Buffalo, you’re not allowed to defend your family, despite the fact you may believe your family is every bit as important as Joe Biden and his family or Nancy Pelosi and her family. But they’re not as important, so we’re going to defund the police and disarm you. That’s how it works now, sorry. And then Joe Biden got to the main point of his speech, which is that people who criticize his immigration policies are responsible for the violence you saw in Buffalo.”

“So, you lock the country down, lock kids out of their schools for two years, force them to get ‘educated’ on the internet, but it’s someone else’s fault that they’re ‘alienated.'”

“They’ve been hearing about the ‘great replacement theory.’ You’ve heard a lot about the ‘great replacement theory’ recently, it’s everywhere in the last two days, and we’re still not sure exactly what it is. Here’s what we do know for a fact. There’s a strong political component to the democratic party’s immigration policy. We’re not guessing this, we know this, and we know it because they have said so. They’ve written books on it. They say it out loud, ‘we’re doing this because it helps us to win elections.'”

“It’s something they’ve gloated about again and again and again and we think that’s wrong.”

“Maybe the funniest part is, they might not be right. The democratic party has decided that, rather than convince you, people who were born here, that their policies are helping you and making the country better and stronger, they will change the electorate.”

“But the funniest part is, they may be wrong, actually. Judging by recent polling, it turns out your average Salvadoran landscaper’s politics are a lot closer to Donald Trump’s than they are to Joe Biden’s and Nancy Pelosi’s.”

“But that’s not even the point.”

Watch as your democrat friends completely miss the hilarity of Joe Biden calling out spreading lies and violence for political power and profit, and leave us a comment.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Tucker Carlson

This would give the government terrifying power

This isn’t about banning TikTok. This is about introducing flat out totalitarianism into our system.

Published

on

Tucker looks at what’s potentially bad about our government’s bipartisan effort to ban TikTok, a move many of us would be on board with…if it weren’t another crudely disguised attempt to rush through something that gives them more vague powers in the name of national security. Highlights include:

“Every day more than 2 billion people use the social media app called TikTok. Many of them are young people under the age of 24. If you had kids, you probably know already how TikTok works. TikTok lets users upload short videos, usually they’re under 30 seconds. What’s interesting is that the content of these videos varies a lot depending upon what country you’re in. If you’re in China, where TikTok is headquartered, you tend to get more educational content. But if you live in this country, you get an awful lot of filth and propaganda tailored for kids.”

“Can you see what’s going on here? Well, China does, they run TikTok and China knows if you want a productive society that extends beyond, say, next week, you teach your kids about hard work and creativity and personal responsibility, respect for authority. But if you want to destroy a society, you funnel a bunch of garbage to kids about gender ideology and ‘twerking’. As the account ‘Libs of TikTok’ has documented extensively, that’s exactly what TikTok is doing here. There’s a whole genre of videos of teachers boasting about indoctrinating kids.”

“Right now, in response to criticism of TikTok, China’s government and the company itself are doing the same thing they did when they responded to allegations of a lab leak in Wuhan. They’re saying anyone who raises questions is a racist, and they’re doing that everywhere across the media, and they can because a lot of the news that you consume is paid for by TikTok.”

“One of the bills that would ban TikTok is being pushed, as we said, by senators in both parties. It’s called the Restrict Act. Mark Warner of Virginia and John Thune of South Dakota, Democrat and Republican, introduced this legislation. Now, the bill is ostensibly protecting American national security and ending ‘foreign adversaries’ from interfering in our elections through apps like TikTok, because of course election interference by Twitter and Facebook is no problem at all, but election interference from TikTok is totally unacceptable, okay. But in reality, and you should know this if you’re opposed to TikTok, as we are, this bill isn’t really about banning TikTok, it’s never about what they say it is. Instead, this bill would give enormous and terrifying new powers to the federal government to punish American citizens and regulate how they communicate with one another. For example, the bill would regulate ‘certain transactions between persons in the United States and foreign adversaries’. Now, what’s a foreign adversary and who gets to decide? Well, the Secretary of Commerce and the DNI, not the Congress, get to decide what foreign adversaries are.”

“So, if the Biden administration decides that you’re doing this, then the secretary of commerce can then enforce ‘any mitigation measure to address any risk arising from any covered transaction by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States’. These ‘covered transactions’ can involve ‘current, past, or potential future transactions’, and the mitigation measures include, but are not limited to throwing American citizens in prison for 20 years.”

“So, you would be allowing the executive branch, the Biden administration, to regulate speech on the internet, and if you are somehow involved with a ‘foreign adversary’, lets say you oppose the war against Russia, you got to prison for 20 years. So, this isn’t about banning TikTok, this is about introducing flat out totalitarianism into our system.”

Watch the video below and give us your thoughts in the comments:

Continue Reading

Tucker Carlson

Tucker: This is malicious

In this country the prosecution has to, for Constitutional and moral reasons, turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense. That did not happen. This is wrong.

Published

on

Tucker comments on the Biden administration’s wanting to arrest up to another 1200 people, not for committing crimes, but for showing their support for democracy, the left’s second favorite word since Biden took office. Highlights include:

“Here’s what we know, a Soros-funded prosecutor in New York, a man who ran on the promise to indict Trump, seems to be working hard to indict Trump, indicting him for a crime that no one even pretends is a crime, including the federal agency that has already investigated it and declared it not a crime.”

“So, in Manhattan tomorrow, what will certainly be an overwhelmingly liberal grand jury will meet, and unless something unexpected happens, Democrats will have taken the unprecedented step of using a corrupt justice system to take out the front runner in the Republican presidential field in a presidential race, and if that happens, America will never be the same.”

“As of tonight, it’s not just Trump who is the target of this, it’s Trump’s voters. The Biden administration is in the process of preparing yet another law enforcement dragnet of more than 1,000 non-violent January 6 protesters. These are not people who broke windows or tussled with cops, these are patriotic Americans who dared to question the official story of the 2020 election.”

“They watched with the rest of us as covid was used as a pretext to eliminate longstanding barriers to voter fraud. They saw a democratic partisan Mark Zuckerberg spend nearly half a billion dollars to influence the mechanics of voting, including in critical swing states. Nevertheless, as they watched the news on the night of November 3, Trump seemed to be winning reelection, and then they woke up and smug tv anchors are telling them that actually, a senile man who refused to campaign had won the biggest landslide in American history.”

“The Biden administration has identified 1,000 additional Trump voters for non-crimes that they claim took place on January 6, mostly walking as Jacob Chansley did. In recent months, according to a story in the Washington Post, US attorney Matthew Graves, a willing tool of the Biden administration , has written to court officials alerting them that an additional 700 to 1200 people may be charged stemming from January 6.”

“This dragnet is so vast that prosecutors are warning DC jails and prisons will be overrun with prisoners, prisoners you can at this point only describe as political prisoners. The Washington Post reports, ‘In recent months, law enforcement and judicial authorities have engaged in discussions to manage the huge volume of Jan. 6 cases without overwhelming the courthouse where pleas and trials are held.'”

“This is depraved and it’s malicious.”

“Now, whatever you think of Jacob Chansley or Donald Trump, if you cared about civil liberties, you would be outraged by this. This is as grave a Constitutional violation as you can have. In this country the prosecution has to, for Constitutional and moral reasons, turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense. That did not happen. This is wrong. This man is rotting in prison, his life has ended for a crime he did not commit and that he was not allowed to fairly defend himself against, but liberals didn’t care. They no longer seem to have any interest in justice or civil rights.”

“What you just saw is a measure of the total moral corruption of our news media and the institutions they serve in Washington and it’s implications for you. If they’ll endorse the unjust destruction of one man, they have no limits. They will do anything, and now with these impending arrests, they’re showing you what they will do. So, if you support the wrong presidential candidate, you get arrested and don’t get to see exculpatory evidence in your trial. Apparently, those are the rules. But if you do vote the ‘right’ way, you get paid. Democrats raise money for your bail when you commit violent crimes, they’ll even force taxpayers to give you money after the fact.”

“What’s so interesting is how you never see these very same people fantasize about locking up, say, the murderers or rapists or armed robbers or people who push elderly women in front of subway cars who are making New York City unlivable. This is a city in which the homicide rate jumped more than 50% from 2019 to 2021 because of their policies. They don’t care about that. They’re not mad at the murderers who cause shootings to increase more than 100% in that same period. They’re not mad that Alvin Bragg, their new favorite prosecutor dropped 70% of actual criminal cases since taking office so that these same criminals can continue to terrorize poor people in neighborhoods where MSNBC anchors live.”

Watch the video and give us your thoughts in the comments:

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending