Self-Hate Leads to Hating Others ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Education

Self-Hate Leads to Hating Others

Self-loathing Caucasians gain positive strokes from one another, virtue signals, and undeniable acceptance for being ‘morally superior.’

Published

on

Consider some of the mass murderers in 2021, including Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, who was charged with 10 counts of first-degree murder in a wild shooting spree in a Boulder, CO supermarket in March, or Robert Aaron Long, who shot and killed a total of eight people at two spas in Atlanta GA also in March. It’s not a stretch to deduce that the perpetrators were imbued with hate. How else could they commit such heinous crimes?

Fort Hood, TX shooter Major Nidal Hasan, who left 13 dead and 32 injured in 2009, and Adam Lanza, who murdered 20 six- and seven-year olds, as well six adults in Newtown, CT in 2012, had to have been filled with hate for both humanity and for themselves. Happy, caring people don’t do what they did.

Mass Self-Hatred

Another type of hate is more insidious and, on balance, more damaging to society in the long run: the self-hate that so many liberal Caucasians have for themselves. Multi-millions of individuals loathe themselves because of their white skin color. They’ve been taught, or more accurately, brainwashed, to view their skin color and ethnicity as inherently damaging to society. To them, solely by virtue of their birth they are a cultural blight.

This hate massive group is mostly comprised of Democrats who form the core of cancel culture. They seek to politically and financially assassinate any person, place, or idea that they deem to be offensive to others, and ironically, that are not necessarily directly offensive to themselves.

This throng is so large, that it completely dwarfs hate groups on the Left such as Antifa (merely an ‘idea’ to Joe Biden); Black Lives Matter and other Leftist militants; the Aryan Nation; KKK; and right wing militants.

Self-selected Guardians of the Galaxy

Why do liberal Caucasians act this way? They are self-appointed guardians of what they believe is justice, fairness, and equanimity throughout society.

Concurrently, it is eye-opening to learn that the majority of minorities individuals are aghast at what the white majority seeks to cancel, because the white majority feels it offensive to select minorities. You don’t like The Cat in the Hat? On January 21, 2015, Michelle Obama invited The Cat in the Hat characters to the White House to read to young students as part of her ‘Let’s Move, Let’s Read!’ initiative. She stated, “Pretty much all the stuff you need to know is in Dr. Seuss.”

Did anyone in attendance, including Ms. Obama, deem such characters to be portraying racial stereotypes? Was anyone in attendance offended, insulted, or outraged? Actually, no. The opposite was true.

How did The Cat in the Hat and other Dr. Seuss books, and his characters suddenly become ‘racist’ when not a single word changed, in any book which he wrote? The answer is that the largest hate group in America, self-loathing liberal Caucasians, hate everything that they remotely suspect somehow disparages minorities.

Too Strange For Fiction

While vast numbers of liberal Caucasians hate themselves, paradoxically they feel morally superior to everyone else. As such, they exhibit a strange psycho-social phenomenon that researchers and academics likely will be studying for decades, if not centuries: How a hate group, so large, consisting of individuals programmed en masse to hate themselves, decided to trash any aspect of society that they feel doesn’t meet their subjective ‘standards.’

These standards spread via the internet like kudzu and become entrenched as part of liberal, Leftist, defacto doctrine. And who among them can debate doctrine?

Those on the right, particularly Caucasians, view this phenomenon with near incredulity. How can so many people so thoroughly hate themselves for phantom transgressions that they have not committed?

In Some Distant Era

As they engage in their various forms of ostracism, boycotts, and what is now called cancel culture, it’s hard to know when the dam will break. After all, self-loathing Caucasians gain positive strokes from one another, virtue signals, and undeniable acceptance for being part of the ‘morally superior’ strain of humanity.

This group is hellbent on its ‘righteous mission’ and knows to the marrow in their bones that they’re on the ‘right side of history.’ Actually, they’re on the right side of cultural lunacy.

One by one, maybe enough of them some how, some way, will awake from their stupor, but don’t hold your breath.

– – – – –

 

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.


Jeff Davidson is the world's only holder of the title "The Work-Life Balance Expert®" as awarded by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He is the premier thought leader on work-life balance, integration, and harmony. Jeff speaks to organizations that seek to enhance their overall productivity by improving the effectiveness of their people. He is the author of Breathing Space, Simpler Living, Dial it Down, and Everyday Project Management. Visit www.BreathingSpace.com for more information on Jeff's keynote speeches and seminars, including: Managing the Pace with Grace® * Achieving Work-Life Balance™ * Managing Information and Communication Overload®



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Business

Justice, not ‘Social’ Justice, Improves Society

If we ignore existing laws simply in favor of what we want, society will soon break down

Published

on

Thomas Jefferson wrote that, “The most sacred of the duties of government is to do equal and impartial justice to all its citizens.” The hallowed duty to fulfill the promise of justice for all remains, or ideally should remain, as the guiding ideal for the people we elect to government.

A friend of mine recently commented that the ‘social’ justice movement in America is alive and well, and that great things have been happening. However, when you put any word in front of the word ‘justice,’ the true meaning of justice is altered. Social justice is some group’s attempt at righting what they consider to be wrong.

I asked my friend for an example of social justice and was told that power lines being installed near poor neighborhoods instead of wealthier neighborhoods was a prime example. I then explained that that was not an issue related to ‘social’ justice but to justice itself.

Express Lanes for Redress

This is not 1860, or 1960. Today, many avenues exist for illuminating any issue of merit. Locally, there are zoning boards in every municipality, city councils usually with members on the left and the right, town hall meetings, public forums, newspapers, local television stations – a variety of entities that can be brought to bear to examine an issue and to forge some type of equitable redress if needed.

To be sure, no form of political government is anywhere near perfect or even equitable, much of the time. Democracy is difficult, but all other forms of government are worse.

In a democracy, or representative republic, such as we have in the U.S., you can’t go off half-cocked and do exactly what you want because you think that a particular law is bad. You have to work to change the law, to change policies, to address inequities within the framework of democracy, and within the bound of the justice system.

A Sanctuary for Whom?

Consider the phenomenon of sanctuary cities. For a sanctuary city to exist, one has to have a mayor, an alderman, city council members,  and other committee members, including those whose were elected as well as as appointed, to believe that what they’re espousing is right, while ignoring what has been passed into law. This ruling class thus usurps that which a majority of citizens rely upon each day.

A sanctuary city, by definition, is a city that is breaking the law. The Left will rationalize that ‘social’ justice requires breaking the law and that not all laws are good laws. True: not all laws are good laws. Laws, nevertheless, were passed as a result of a process in place for tens if not hundreds of years.

If laws routinely discriminate against one segment of the population versus another, then by all means work to change the law. When you insert catchphrases into the mix, such as ‘social’ justice, what that actually means is that you have another viewpoint of an issue. Further, you deem that your view and your actions are more meritorious than whatever came before them.

Vigilantism isn’t Pretty

Years ago, by exhibiting such behavior, you would be called a vigilante. Vigilantes are a self-appointed group who engage in policy enforcement without having legal authority, usually because they deem the legal agencies to be inadequate.

We dwell in a society where the media is distinctly liberal, and even leftist – as we have witnessed with big tech, the big TV networks, nearly all newspapers, and, unfortunately, a variety of government agencies. Thus, those advocating for ‘social’ justice have the wind at their backs. Yet, they violate the rights, and votes, of half the population and perhaps much more.

Welcome to My Two Cents

Any one of us could offer a long list of social issues that we’d like to change. If we decide, willy-nilly, to start ignoring existing laws in favor of what we want, how long will it take before society breaks down completely? Taking the law into your own hands is the essence of what it means to be a vigilante. Vigilante-dominated societies are not healthy. Many of their residents live in constant fear.

Taking the law into your own hands is an ill-advised shortcut to seeking what you want without working through the system, however imperfect the system might be. This country, any country, does not need more vigilantism.

– – – – –

 

Continue Reading

Education

Texas School District Says Enough is Enough

Published

on

school
Photo by MChe Lee on Unsplash

BREAKING: The Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District in North Texas voted last night to:

1) Ban the teaching of critical race theory. 

2) Wait until students are in the fifth grade to teach them sexual orientation and gender identity. 

3) Ban boys from playing in girls’ sports.

4) Encourage the use of pronouns that align with student’s biological gender and require them to use restrooms and locker rooms that align with their biological gender.

5) Require that library materials be posted online and readily available for review by parents.

6) Not teach The New York Times “1619 Project”.

7) Implement a strict process for reviewing library books, so as to allow To Kill A Mockingbird and disallow Daddy, Papa, and Me and others.

It seems nearly incomprehensible that a school district would have to vote on measures like these. In fact, to many thoughtful Americans, it seems utterly Orwellian. How can truths about gender and the proper use of pronouns suddenly seem controversial rather than commonsensical?

Why does it seem radical to return power to parents and reaffirm biological reality? Or to keep boys from dominating girls in sports? Or to let students read revisionist history and propaganda about their nation on their own time? Why teach something that cannot withstand even the lightest objective criticism? 

Perhaps the school district’s 4-3 vote is a sign that there’s hope, that the pendulum has reached its arc and is beginning to move back toward truth and reality. Maybe the radicals are on the run.

No matter what, kudos to North Texas educators for pushing back against the absurdity and reaffirming responsible education.

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending