Kamala Harris: The Shirker-in-Chief ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Politics

Kamala Harris: The Shirker-in-Chief

Harris could be destined to be president: the worst that we’ve ever had, even worse than Carter, Obama, and Biden

Published

on

Kamala Harris thinks that U.S. citizens in rural America don’t own copiers or scanners, can’t drive to or are not near enough to an office supply store, and can’t take a cell phone photo of their government-issued ID. Isn’t it marvelous to have a Vice President who is so in touch with the people?

Regretfully, sometime before 2025, Harris might likely take over as president of the United States, obviously the first female and, as she keeps pounding into everybody’s brain, “a woman of color.” If so, Harris is destined to be the worst president that we’ve ever had for a variety of reasons. Foremost is that she lacks judgment, perspective, dedication, and any semblance of patriotism.

Assigned to handle the border situation by Joe Biden, or at least that’s what the party line would have us believe, she spent weeks and then months assiduously avoiding the border. When she did visit, she stayed miles away from any of the hot spots. Indeed, Harris avoids anything that she prefers to not address. As politicians go, she is as close to spineless as you can find. Tulsi Gabbard took her out of the Democratic primary debates in under three minutes.

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Tucker: Because of Joe Biden, it’s that simple

A Grating Voiced-Progressive

Soon, we might have no choice but to hear that grating voice make proclamations from on high, for which she has no qualifications and worse, and does not have the best interests of American citizens in mind. Harris is a progressive, more so than even Barack Obama and on par with whoever is handling Joe Biden during his short, ridiculous presidency.

She cares little or nothing about rank-and-file American citizens unless, of course, they are progressive, ‘of color,’ transsexual, or some other classification which she deems to be worthy. Harris is all for having our border become flooded by immigrants, so that the United States itself has a ballooning population, and that our budgets burst beyond repair. Not Cuban refugees, however: they might become future Republicans.

In Harrisworld white males are the least worthy of U.S. citizens. She did marry one of them but that aside, in her mind, the multi-millions of white males in America are clearly oppressors. In her view, the foul deeds of white males are the reason that The New York Times supported the 1619 Project. White males are the root of all evil! They make up most of the police forces and shoot black people whenever they can. They harbor and perpetuate systemic racism and they can never be redeemed!

Historical For the Wrong Reasons

It is an irony of history that someone as compromised and unintelligent, so lacking in leadership that her own staff can’t stand her, and unprepared to be the president of all, could serve as the first female president. There are so many others that deserve that distinction, among them Condoleezza Rice, Nikki Haley, Kristi Noem, Marsha Blackburn, and even Candace Owens. All are far more knowledgeable, qualified, personable, and prepared.

A single leader like Harris can ruin a nation for generations. Take a look at Germany, Russia, Uganda, Cambodia, Venezuela, and, yes, right in our own backyard, Cuba.

You’d think that the people would rise up and revolt in such countries, but the leaders always control the military. The military in any democratically run country are leery of turning on those who get into power. In rare occasions around the world, such as the Philippines, it has happened. Too often, however, the reign of Leftists/Socialists lasts for decades. They seek to stomp out everybody and anybody on the right, and anyone, domestically, who worked in the Trump Administration.

Robert Reich who served in several Democrat presidential administrations wants to put Trump voters in re-education camps. AOC wants to compose a list so that we know exactly who is who on the on the right. The point is do not take Kamala Harris and her Leftist henchmen lightly. They are vicious, they are violent, and they have no problem whatsoever serving up hostilities to those with whom they disagree, because they ‘know they are right.’

The Harris Enemies List

Who is on her list? People who disagree with her politically, and people who seek fair and effective voter I.D. laws. Also those who seek free speech on campus, merit-based college acceptance, effective law enforcement, rights for the unborn, and secure U.S. sovereignty via secure borders.

Who else? Anyone who is deeply religious (except for Muslims), favors school vouchers, seeks to return power to state and local school boards, and runs for office as a Republican or Libertarian.

– – – – –

 

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.


Jeff Davidson is the world's only holder of the title "The Work-Life Balance Expert®" as awarded by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He is the premier thought leader on work-life balance, integration, and harmony. Jeff speaks to organizations that seek to enhance their overall productivity by improving the effectiveness of their people. He is the author of Breathing Space, Simpler Living, Dial it Down, and Everyday Project Management. Visit www.BreathingSpace.com for more information on Jeff's keynote speeches and seminars, including: Managing the Pace with Grace® * Achieving Work-Life Balance™ * Managing Information and Communication Overload®



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



News

In-N-Out Burger Serves Customers, not San Francisco

Published

on

In-N-Out
Photo credit: Andrew Weibert

In-N-Out Burger just served San Francisco an everything burger, animal style. It’s heartening to see an iconic restaurant chain stand up to government overreach—and in an ultra-liberal enclave, to boot.

Here’s how it went down. San Francisco issued an edict to force bars and restaurants to verify customers’ COVID vaccination papers before allowing entry.

In response, In-N-Out Burger dutifully posted the city’s vaccination requirement on its windows. This placed the onus where it belongs—on their customers. This is as far as a private company need go.

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Tucker: Because of Joe Biden, it’s that simple

However, San Francisco sees things much differently. They closed down the city’s only In-N-Out Burger location, on Fisherman’s Wharf. As a result, the burger chain issued this statement:

“Local regulators informed us that our restaurant Associates must actively intervene by demanding proof of vaccination and photo identification from every Customer…. We refuse to become the vaccination police for any government. We fiercely disagree with any government dictate that forces a private company to discriminate against customers who choose to patronize their business.”

San Francisco’s beef shouldn’t be with In-N-Out Burger—it should be with its unvaccinated citizens. If the city chooses to order an unconstitutional vaccination requirement for bars and restaurants, they should enforce it, not the bars and restaurants. They’re private businesses, not COVID cops.

Burger bouncers

In-N-Out Burger trains their associates to cheerfully ask customers if they’d like to add fries and shakes to their meals, not to question them about controversial vaccination mandates. Additionally, they shouldn’t be required to make their associates act as bouncers to eject unvaccinated customers.

As an aside, America is one of the only nations on Earth that requires vaccination passports. Most if not all other countries require immunity passports, which include the vaccinated and those who are unvaccinated yet have degrees of natural immunity after being infected with the coronavirus.

The San Francisco In-N-Out Burger mess perfectly illustrates what should be happening all over America. Private business is not an arm of local, state or federal government. We’re all dealing with the pandemic—why compound the problem by attempting to force private businesses to enforce governmental mandates?

It makes one wonder how San Francisco leaders failed to see this coming. Can any serious person imagine cheerful, smiling, In-N-Out Burger associates making effective burger bouncers? It’s ridiculous for any city to expect restaurant employees to provide vaccination enforcement.

This smacks of more than mere incompetence. Did the city truly expect bars and restaurants to comply? If so, this seems like autocratic (and dangerous) arrogance.

If San Francisco wants to enforce vaccination inspections, they should do it themselves on the sidewalk in front of bars and restaurants. Closing restaurants that don’t force their employees to act as muscle for the city is poor leadership.

Given In-N-Out Burger’s wild popularity, it’s safe to say that most customers want their locations open. If some side with San Francisco in closing the restaurant and forcing associates to be vaccination police, they can get lesser burgers elsewhere.

Smart business

It’s called freedom. And clearly, it’s in short supply in places like San Francisco. Kudos to In-N-Out Burger for making a stand.

Here’s hoping other private businesses will take heart in In-N-Out Burger’s sound and smart business sense and stand up to one-size-fits-all autocrats. If they do, it’s likely that most of their customers will continue supporting them and they may even gain new ones.

Smart and principled businesses take risks for the right reasons. In-N-Out Burger is right to defy San Francisco. Prediction: By refusing to discriminate when serving its customers, they’ll sell even more burgers, fries and shakes in the City by the Bay and in their other 368 locations across America.

Continue Reading

Business

Pandora Papers, a box of trouble for whom?

Published

on

Pandoras box seems to be a well-known metaphor in today’s culture. It is often used to represent unknowingly opening a box of wop-ass. The Greek origins are a little more complex.  Pandora was the first human woman, a gift from the gods. She was made from earth to be lovely as a goddess. With the gift of speech to tell lies, and the mind and nature of a treacherous dog. She was given a golden crown of animals and sea creatures. Pandora was blessed with grace, desire and caring to weaken her limbs.

Pandora was the first woman to live among mortal men, first bride and great misery. She was destined to live with men in times of plenty and to desert them in hard times.  Her name means both “she who gives all gifts” and “she who was given all gifts”. In the mythology she opened a jar that belonged to her husband that contained every misery that affects man to today, but managed to close it before hope was able to escape the jar.

Which brings us to the latest document leak from the International Consortium of investigative Journalists or ICIJ. This is the latest of leaks following the Panama papers and the Paradise papers. ICIJ claims this is the largest leak of tax haven information ever. The 11.9 million financial records include information on 330 politicians and high level leaders, including 35 country leaders. For two years over 600 journalists from 117 countries helped to follow up leads exposed by the leak.

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Tucker: Because of Joe Biden, it’s that simple

Top leaders with homes in Malibu, Monti Carlo, and high rise towers in Dubai. Investments in sugar plantations, polluting factories, and even a hospital. Secret companies and Trusts to hide assets from taxes and their people. ICIJ likes to point out that this money could have been used to help build roads, hospitals, and schools. They also imply the money comes from ill-gotten gains. Pointing out that hiding money is also used during drug smuggling, human trafficking, bribery, and international terrorism.

In an effort to seem like actual investigative journalists they do mention that nothing they were fed was illegal.  They failed to mention that the tax regulations in every one of the countries involved are written by the rich themselves. Mostly by those not uncovered by the Pandora Papers. Something the 600 seemed to have over looked during their two year investigation is any tax avoidance from the United States. Funny thing that.

To find out why you need to look at who the International Consortium of investigative Journalists is and who finances them. It turns out the group was founded in 1997, they claim to take no public funds only donations. Their largest donors happen to be Soros, thru the The Open Society Foundation. Now needless to say Soros is not going to admit what each one of these people did to stop his march towards one world government headed by Soros and company, but we can speculate.

Tony Blair, supported the American action in Afghanistan. King Abdullanh met with and supported Israel. Vladimir Putin would rather not have a one world government telling him how to run Russia. Shakira no stranger to wokeness had the gall to disagree with the Conovirus imprisonment and demanded children be let outside into the sun and air. You can bet that each one of the targets of this dump had somehow displeased those supporting the great reset.

Each one of these thought they had found a beautiful tax haven not knowing it was she who gives all gifts and conversely she who is given all gifts. By selectively revealing that it is worthwhile to spend money to hide income from those who did not earn it is telling. Besides highlighting that taxes are too high for the services provided. Telling that not one American is mentioned. Telling that the “journalists” didn’t discover how politicians in government get rich on civil service salaries. Not one mention of the heads of NGO’s (non-governmental agencies) have found that the poor are very very good for them. How about a peek into how many of the 1.5 million tax exempt organizations in America are just a tax dodge.

We will wait with the patience of Job for the International Consortium of investigative Journalists to do some real investigating.

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending

Politicrossing
 
Send this to a friend