Tucker Carlson

How would you describe the Biden administration?

Well, really the hallmark has been almost otherworldly disconnection from the actual affairs of the United States.

Published

1 month ago

March 1, 2023

Alan Rugger

Old news for those of us who’ve been paying attention, but Tucker again recounts the covid timeline and how the US government and media have been handling it, now that the Department of Energy has come out and said it looks like it was created in a lab, and as usual, the White House is still still sweeping under the rug and insisting there’s nothing to see here. Highlights include:

Tucker: This is an outrage

“How would you describe the Biden administration? Well, really the hallmark has been almost otherworldly disconnection from the actual affairs of the United States. If it’s really happening in this country, the Biden administration will pretend it’s not. In fact, White House officials seem to have no idea what’s going on in our country and no interest in learning about it.”

“The Wall Street Journal reported the Biden administration has finally concluded that yes, covid was not naturally occurring. It didn’t emerge organically from a pangolin, whatever that is, at the wet market, whatever that is. No, the virus came from a Chinese military lab, where it was created. That’s the determination of the Department of Energy, based on ‘new intelligence’, that of course, everyone already had. Now, we learn this, interestingly, from a newspaper. We did not learn it directly from the Biden administration because Joe Biden hasn’t said a word about it. And that’s a little odd. A million Americans, they tell us, died of covid, close to seven million died globally , so it’s inherently a big story.”

“Is Joe Biden still sending money to China for biotech research? The administration was actually doing that, sending cash to that same Wuhan lab as recently as last year. Are they still doing that? And, bigger picture, have their views on China changed now that we know that China is responsible that China is responsible for the deaths of almost 7 million people. Now that we know China unleashed covid on the world, and then lied about it, for sure, and then hid life saving genetic information about the virus from the scientists who were trying to respond to covid, now that we know all of that, does Joe Biden still consider Vladimir Putin the greatest threat to world peace and stability?”

“They’re lying. We know perfectly well where covid came from, we’ve known this for years. In fact, one of the very first things we knew about covid was that it was an engineered virus that escaped somehow, intentionally or not, from a Chinese military biolab in Wuhan. It was in early March of 2020, three full years ago at the very beginning, that we did a long open on this show about the Chinese research paper whose authors later disappeared. Now, these Chinese scientific researchers scolded the Chinese government for the lax safety standards that they said allowed covid to escape and infect the world.”

“In mid-November of 2019, a friendly Asian government, we have learned, sent a cable to American officials warning there was evidence there’s something strange going on in Wuhan and it looked like a dangerous leak from a biolab. They knew that, the origins of covid were never a secret. The real story, the great outrage of this story, is that the people who knew, or should’ve know the truth, lied about the truth. Why? To hide the Chinese government’s role in mass murder, the killing of almost 7 million people and the destruction of the American economy. That’s the interesting part, looking back 3 years later. From the beginning of the outbreak, the American media, as one took the side of the Chinese government in this new propaganda war over covid.”
“…If the US media had swung behind the evidence in this story and pressed ‘where did this virus come from?’, then it’s potentially conceivable that scientists in the United States would’ve forced the government of China to release the information they had about the genetic makeup of covid, and maybe we would’ve had a vaccine that worked, for example, or a medical response that saved American’s lives, but they didn’t. None of them did.”

“It’s almost too unpleasant to bring you the story, because the wall of dishonesty was impenetrable at that point, three years ago. The one thing we needed to know – where did this come from? – was the one thing they wouldn’t let you even consider. In fact, if you did , you would be ‘unpersoned’, facebook banned any user who suggested the virus was man made because ‘the science was settled’. It was not settled at all! There was no science, we didn’t know anything!”

“On March 17 of 2020, a group of scientists wrote a paper in Nature Magazine. That paper concluded that ‘we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.’ Now, that’s the ‘final word’, that’s ‘the science’. Well, internal NIH emails show that Tony Fauci helped edit that paper. He did not disclose that publicly, it was all behind the scenes. Now, that’s significant because Fauci was funding ‘bat coronavirus experiments’ in Wuhan, the ones that apparently caused ‘the pandemic’. So, he was editing the report on the origin of the virus? Okay, that’s not ‘peer reviewed’, as we say, it’s the opposite. As Paul Thacker reports on his substack, just a few days after that paper was published in Nature, the state department’s office of outreach, part of the bureau of intelligence and research, began promoting these false findings, these lies. The state department covertly recruited ‘scientists’ around Washington DC at off-the-record high-level meetings, telling everyone who enlisted, that covid ’emerged naturally in an animal before crossing to humans and was not engineered in a lab’. Now, the scientists who made this false briefing, who told these lies, cited one source: The Nature article article that was secretly edited by Tony Fauci…”

Watch the video below and give us your thoughts in the comments.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Up Next

Tucker: This video tells a different story of January 6

Don't Miss

Tucker: This will make you shiver

Tucker Carlson

This would give the government terrifying power

This isn’t about banning TikTok. This is about introducing flat out totalitarianism into our system.

Published

4 days ago

March 27, 2023

Alan Rugger

Tucker looks at what’s potentially bad about our government’s bipartisan effort to ban TikTok, a move many of us would be on board with…if it weren’t another crudely disguised attempt to rush through something that gives them more vague powers in the name of national security. Highlights include:

“Every day more than 2 billion people use the social media app called TikTok. Many of them are young people under the age of 24. If you had kids, you probably know already how TikTok works. TikTok lets users upload short videos, usually they’re under 30 seconds. What’s interesting is that the content of these videos varies a lot depending upon what country you’re in. If you’re in China, where TikTok is headquartered, you tend to get more educational content. But if you live in this country, you get an awful lot of filth and propaganda tailored for kids.”

“Can you see what’s going on here? Well, China does, they run TikTok and China knows if you want a productive society that extends beyond, say, next week, you teach your kids about hard work and creativity and personal responsibility, respect for authority. But if you want to destroy a society, you funnel a bunch of garbage to kids about gender ideology and ‘twerking’. As the account ‘Libs of TikTok’ has documented extensively, that’s exactly what TikTok is doing here. There’s a whole genre of videos of teachers boasting about indoctrinating kids.”

“Right now, in response to criticism of TikTok, China’s government and the company itself are doing the same thing they did when they responded to allegations of a lab leak in Wuhan. They’re saying anyone who raises questions is a racist, and they’re doing that everywhere across the media, and they can because a lot of the news that you consume is paid for by TikTok.”

“One of the bills that would ban TikTok is being pushed, as we said, by senators in both parties. It’s called the Restrict Act. Mark Warner of Virginia and John Thune of South Dakota, Democrat and Republican, introduced this legislation. Now, the bill is ostensibly protecting American national security and ending ‘foreign adversaries’ from interfering in our elections through apps like TikTok, because of course election interference by Twitter and Facebook is no problem at all, but election interference from TikTok is totally unacceptable, okay. But in reality, and you should know this if you’re opposed to TikTok, as we are, this bill isn’t really about banning TikTok, it’s never about what they say it is. Instead, this bill would give enormous and terrifying new powers to the federal government to punish American citizens and regulate how they communicate with one another. For example, the bill would regulate ‘certain transactions between persons in the United States and foreign adversaries’. Now, what’s a foreign adversary and who gets to decide? Well, the Secretary of Commerce and the DNI, not the Congress, get to decide what foreign adversaries are.”

“So, if the Biden administration decides that you’re doing this, then the secretary of commerce can then enforce ‘any mitigation measure to address any risk arising from any covered transaction by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States’. These ‘covered transactions’ can involve ‘current, past, or potential future transactions’, and the mitigation measures include, but are not limited to throwing American citizens in prison for 20 years.”

“So, you would be allowing the executive branch, the Biden administration, to regulate speech on the internet, and if you are somehow involved with a ‘foreign adversary’, lets say you oppose the war against Russia, you got to prison for 20 years. So, this isn’t about banning TikTok, this is about introducing flat out totalitarianism into our system.”

Watch the video below and give us your thoughts in the comments:

Tucker Carlson

Tucker: This is malicious

In this country the prosecution has to, for Constitutional and moral reasons, turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense. That did not happen. This is wrong.

Published

1 week ago

March 23, 2023

Alan Rugger

Tucker comments on the Biden administration’s wanting to arrest up to another 1200 people, not for committing crimes, but for showing their support for democracy, the left’s second favorite word since Biden took office. Highlights include:

“Here’s what we know, a Soros-funded prosecutor in New York, a man who ran on the promise to indict Trump, seems to be working hard to indict Trump, indicting him for a crime that no one even pretends is a crime, including the federal agency that has already investigated it and declared it not a crime.”

“So, in Manhattan tomorrow, what will certainly be an overwhelmingly liberal grand jury will meet, and unless something unexpected happens, Democrats will have taken the unprecedented step of using a corrupt justice system to take out the front runner in the Republican presidential field in a presidential race, and if that happens, America will never be the same.”

“As of tonight, it’s not just Trump who is the target of this, it’s Trump’s voters. The Biden administration is in the process of preparing yet another law enforcement dragnet of more than 1,000 non-violent January 6 protesters. These are not people who broke windows or tussled with cops, these are patriotic Americans who dared to question the official story of the 2020 election.”

“They watched with the rest of us as covid was used as a pretext to eliminate longstanding barriers to voter fraud. They saw a democratic partisan Mark Zuckerberg spend nearly half a billion dollars to influence the mechanics of voting, including in critical swing states. Nevertheless, as they watched the news on the night of November 3, Trump seemed to be winning reelection, and then they woke up and smug tv anchors are telling them that actually, a senile man who refused to campaign had won the biggest landslide in American history.”

“The Biden administration has identified 1,000 additional Trump voters for non-crimes that they claim took place on January 6, mostly walking as Jacob Chansley did. In recent months, according to a story in the Washington Post, US attorney Matthew Graves, a willing tool of the Biden administration , has written to court officials alerting them that an additional 700 to 1200 people may be charged stemming from January 6.”

“This dragnet is so vast that prosecutors are warning DC jails and prisons will be overrun with prisoners, prisoners you can at this point only describe as political prisoners. The Washington Post reports, ‘In recent months, law enforcement and judicial authorities have engaged in discussions to manage the huge volume of Jan. 6 cases without overwhelming the courthouse where pleas and trials are held.'”

“This is depraved and it’s malicious.”

“Now, whatever you think of Jacob Chansley or Donald Trump, if you cared about civil liberties, you would be outraged by this. This is as grave a Constitutional violation as you can have. In this country the prosecution has to, for Constitutional and moral reasons, turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense. That did not happen. This is wrong. This man is rotting in prison, his life has ended for a crime he did not commit and that he was not allowed to fairly defend himself against, but liberals didn’t care. They no longer seem to have any interest in justice or civil rights.”

“What you just saw is a measure of the total moral corruption of our news media and the institutions they serve in Washington and it’s implications for you. If they’ll endorse the unjust destruction of one man, they have no limits. They will do anything, and now with these impending arrests, they’re showing you what they will do. So, if you support the wrong presidential candidate, you get arrested and don’t get to see exculpatory evidence in your trial. Apparently, those are the rules. But if you do vote the ‘right’ way, you get paid. Democrats raise money for your bail when you commit violent crimes, they’ll even force taxpayers to give you money after the fact.”

“What’s so interesting is how you never see these very same people fantasize about locking up, say, the murderers or rapists or armed robbers or people who push elderly women in front of subway cars who are making New York City unlivable. This is a city in which the homicide rate jumped more than 50% from 2019 to 2021 because of their policies. They don’t care about that. They’re not mad at the murderers who cause shootings to increase more than 100% in that same period. They’re not mad that Alvin Bragg, their new favorite prosecutor dropped 70% of actual criminal cases since taking office so that these same criminals can continue to terrorize poor people in neighborhoods where MSNBC anchors live.”

Watch the video and give us your thoughts in the comments: