Tucker Carlson
How would you describe the Biden administration?
Well, really the hallmark has been almost otherworldly disconnection from the actual affairs of the United States.
Old news for those of us who’ve been paying attention, but Tucker again recounts the covid timeline and how the US government and media have been handling it, now that the Department of Energy has come out and said it looks like it was created in a lab, and as usual, the White House is still still sweeping under the rug and insisting there’s nothing to see here. Highlights include:
Tucker: This is an outrage
“How would you describe the Biden administration? Well, really the hallmark has been almost otherworldly disconnection from the actual affairs of the United States. If it’s really happening in this country, the Biden administration will pretend it’s not. In fact, White House officials seem to have no idea what’s going on in our country and no interest in learning about it.”
“The Wall Street Journal reported the Biden administration has finally concluded that yes, covid was not naturally occurring. It didn’t emerge organically from a pangolin, whatever that is, at the wet market, whatever that is. No, the virus came from a Chinese military lab, where it was created. That’s the determination of the Department of Energy, based on ‘new intelligence’, that of course, everyone already had. Now, we learn this, interestingly, from a newspaper. We did not learn it directly from the Biden administration because Joe Biden hasn’t said a word about it. And that’s a little odd. A million Americans, they tell us, died of covid, close to seven million died globally , so it’s inherently a big story.”
“Is Joe Biden still sending money to China for biotech research? The administration was actually doing that, sending cash to that same Wuhan lab as recently as last year. Are they still doing that? And, bigger picture, have their views on China changed now that we know that China is responsible that China is responsible for the deaths of almost 7 million people. Now that we know China unleashed covid on the world, and then lied about it, for sure, and then hid life saving genetic information about the virus from the scientists who were trying to respond to covid, now that we know all of that, does Joe Biden still consider Vladimir Putin the greatest threat to world peace and stability?”
“They’re lying. We know perfectly well where covid came from, we’ve known this for years. In fact, one of the very first things we knew about covid was that it was an engineered virus that escaped somehow, intentionally or not, from a Chinese military biolab in Wuhan. It was in early March of 2020, three full years ago at the very beginning, that we did a long open on this show about the Chinese research paper whose authors later disappeared. Now, these Chinese scientific researchers scolded the Chinese government for the lax safety standards that they said allowed covid to escape and infect the world.”
“In mid-November of 2019, a friendly Asian government, we have learned, sent a cable to American officials warning there was evidence there’s something strange going on in Wuhan and it looked like a dangerous leak from a biolab. They knew that, the origins of covid were never a secret. The real story, the great outrage of this story, is that the people who knew, or should’ve know the truth, lied about the truth. Why? To hide the Chinese government’s role in mass murder, the killing of almost 7 million people and the destruction of the American economy. That’s the interesting part, looking back 3 years later. From the beginning of the outbreak, the American media, as one took the side of the Chinese government in this new propaganda war over covid.”
“…If the US media had swung behind the evidence in this story and pressed ‘where did this virus come from?’, then it’s potentially conceivable that scientists in the United States would’ve forced the government of China to release the information they had about the genetic makeup of covid, and maybe we would’ve had a vaccine that worked, for example, or a medical response that saved American’s lives, but they didn’t. None of them did.”
“It’s almost too unpleasant to bring you the story, because the wall of dishonesty was impenetrable at that point, three years ago. The one thing we needed to know – where did this come from? – was the one thing they wouldn’t let you even consider. In fact, if you did , you would be ‘unpersoned’, facebook banned any user who suggested the virus was man made because ‘the science was settled’. It was not settled at all! There was no science, we didn’t know anything!”
“On March 17 of 2020, a group of scientists wrote a paper in Nature Magazine. That paper concluded that ‘we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.’ Now, that’s the ‘final word’, that’s ‘the science’. Well, internal NIH emails show that Tony Fauci helped edit that paper. He did not disclose that publicly, it was all behind the scenes. Now, that’s significant because Fauci was funding ‘bat coronavirus experiments’ in Wuhan, the ones that apparently caused ‘the pandemic’. So, he was editing the report on the origin of the virus? Okay, that’s not ‘peer reviewed’, as we say, it’s the opposite. As Paul Thacker reports on his substack, just a few days after that paper was published in Nature, the state department’s office of outreach, part of the bureau of intelligence and research, began promoting these false findings, these lies. The state department covertly recruited ‘scientists’ around Washington DC at off-the-record high-level meetings, telling everyone who enlisted, that covid ’emerged naturally in an animal before crossing to humans and was not engineered in a lab’. Now, the scientists who made this false briefing, who told these lies, cited one source: The Nature article article that was secretly edited by Tony Fauci…”
Watch the video below and give us your thoughts in the comments.
We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
Tucker Carlson
Tucker: Ep. 73 The Vladimir Putin Interview
Our goal is to stop this war, and we did not start this war in 2022. This is an attempt to stop it.
The interview that’s had most of your “legacy media’s” panties in a twist all week has finally happened.
I don’t remember anyone making a fuss when Dan Rather interviewed Saddam Hussein, just sayin’.
Tucker Carlson gets Vladimir Putin’s take on, among other things, the current situation in Ukraine, how it started and possible resolutions, Russia’s relationship with China,the world economy, and a look into the future. Highlights include:
“After 1991 when Russia expected that it would be welcomed into the brotherly family of civilized nations, nothing like this happened. You tricked us. I don’t mean you personally when I say you. Of course I’m talking about the United States. The promise was that NATO would not expand eastward. But it happened five times. There were five waves of expansion. We tolerated all that. We were trying to persuade them. We were saying, please don’t. We are as bourgeois now as you are. We are a market economy and there is no communist party power, let’s negotiate.
“The events in the Middle East, in Iraq, we were building relations with the United States in a very soft, prudent, cautious manner. I repeatedly raised the issue that the United States should not support separatism or terrorism in the North Caucasus, but they continued to do it anyway. And political support, information support, financial support, even military support came from the United States and its satellites for terrorist groups in the Caucasus. I once raised this issue with my colleague, also the president of the United States. He says it’s impossible, do you have proof? I said yes, I was prepared for this conversation, and I gave him that proof. He looked at it, and you know what he said? I apologize, but that’s what happened. I’ll quote, “Well, I’m gonna kick their ass.” We waited and waited for some response…The CIA replied, “We have been working with the opposition in Russia. We believe that this is the thing to do and we will on doing it.”
“…In 2008, the doors of NATO were opened for Ukraine. In 2014, there was a coup. They started persecuting those who did not accept the coup, and it was indeed a coup. They created a threat to Crimea, which we had to take under our protection. They launched the war in Donbas in 2014 with the use of aircraft and artillery against civilians. This is when it all started… They launched a large scale military operation, then another one. When they failed, they started to prepare the next one. All this against the background of military development of this territory and opening of NATO’s doors. How could we not express concern over what was happening?”
“Our goal is to stop this war, and we did not start this war in 2022. This is an attempt to stop it… No, we haven’t achieved our aims yet because one of them is de-nazification. This means the prohibition of all kinds of neo-Nazi movements. This is one of the problems that we discussed during the negotiation process, which ended in Istanbul early this year…and it was not our initiative, because we were told, by the Europeans in particular, that it was necessary to create conditions for the final signing of the documents.”
“Further on, the president of Ukraine issued a decree prohibiting negotiations with us. Let him cancel that decree, and that’s it. We have never refused negotiations, indeed. We hear all the time, is Russia ready? Yes. We have not refused. It was them who publicly refused. Well, let him cancel his decree and enter into negotiations. We have never refused.”
Check out the interview for yourself and give us your thoughts in the comments.
Ep. 73 The Vladimir Putin Interview pic.twitter.com/67YuZRkfLL
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 8, 2024
Tucker Carlson
Tucker: Fossil Fuels in Space?
The IPCC and all these so-called scientists from NASA, NOAA, and all of them are not doing their due diligence.
If fossil fuels come from fossils, why is there oil and natural gas on other planets? Tucker interviews Dr. Willie Soon on the climate, sun activity, and the current state of science. Highlights include:
“In the United States, we often refer to our main sources of energy as ‘fossil fuels’. Oil, natural gas, coal, they’re ‘fossil fuels’ because they come form fossils, ancient organic material, forests, jungles, plankton, dinosaurs. Held under the ground for millennia, they transform into oil, gas and coal. Everybody thinks that’s true. On the other hand, there’s evidence that maybe it’s not the whole story. If that’s where fossil fuels come from, if that’s how hydrocarbons are made, then how come they’re found so deep under the oceans and at the top of the Earth? How come one of Saturn’s moons, according to scientists, has more oil and natural gas than Earth? Were there dinosaurs and planktons and forests at one point on one of Saturn’s moons? Probably not. So, if all hydrocarbons aren’t from fossils, where are they from and why isn’t this commonly known, and what are the implications of it, and what does it tell us about our modern climate change policy?”
“It’s the sun, actually, that does a lot of this. The glacial, like, this period called Little Ice Age from about 1300 to 1900, you know, very cool, and then there’s a bit of a warm period from 880 to about 1200, you know, it was warm. I mean, you can grow wine in England, right? And now you cannot grow wine, right? /Things like that. I mean, Greenland was green back then, but now it’s full of glaciers, ice is coming in, so what are you talking about exactly?”
“There’s another effect that is very, very important. It’s basically because the sun, the earth is forced to go around the sun, and then the orbit changes ever so slightly because of perturbation from all the other planets… Jupiter, Saturn, and even Venus, and Mars, they are actually controlling what we do. And the moon as well is very important. But that other factors [sic], the orbits plus the changes of the sun by itself, between how bright, how dim it is. These two factors can explain just about everything that we know.”
“This year, just two months ago, we published two more papers, convincingly show that even the thermometer data that they show you is not what it is. It’s actually not measuring ‘climate’, it’s measuring urban heat and island changes…If you go to the inner part of the big city…You go to inner cities, much warmer than outside because of concrete retaining all the heat, or you change all the surfaces, the surface becomes impervious, which means there’s no breathing, no water going in and out… What we show is that it’s not a phenomenon just on local signs. You average over this, you can see the effect all over the northern hemisphere.. And they tell you this is global temperature.”
“The IPCC and all these so-called scientists from NASA, NOAA, and all of them are not doing their due diligence. They are putting you…very bad quality data products. Not only that, they hide it. Some of them it’s so difficult to get the data.”
You can find the links below and leave us your thoughts in the comments:
Ep. 62 If fossil fuels come from fossils, why have scientists found them on one of Saturn’s moons? A lot of what you’ve heard about energy is false. Dr. Willie Soon explains.
TIMESTAMPS
(01:49) Fossil Fuels in Space
(14:27) Global Warming Throughout History
(25:31) Outside… pic.twitter.com/GMaDkDl8z9— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) January 9, 2024
America No More…
Biden wants to tie Israel’s hands
Prepare for the Worst: Domestic Sabotage and Violence on the Horizon
America’s Unjust Justice System
With Representatives Like Kelly Daughtry, We Can Take Back America
Why East Coast Workers are Blurry Eyed on Monday Morning
The Rise of Mark Robinson and the Benefit to North Carolina
Jesus, Master of Influence
Chris Widener, speaker and best selling author of The Art of Influence, teaches that Jesus is the master of influence. In sixteen sessions you will learn from one of the most influential communicators how the life and teachings of Jesus Christ is the best model for how to become an effective influence that can change people’s thoughts, beliefs and actions.
LEARN MORE
