Politics

Here’s What AI Says About the Steele Russian Dossier – You Will Be Pleasantly Surprised!

Moving forward, it is crucial that the FBI takes steps to address these criticisms and rebuild public trust in its operations.

Published

7 months ago

March 6, 2023

Chris Widener

In recent years, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has faced criticism and scrutiny over its handling of the Steele Russian Dossier, a controversial document that purported to detail the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia during the 2016 election. The dossier was compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and contained salacious and unverified allegations that the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia to interfere in the election.

The FBI’s handling of the dossier has been criticized on several fronts, including its reliance on the document to obtain a surveillance warrant against former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page, and its failure to fully disclose the dossier’s origins and credibility to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).

One of the key criticisms of the FBI’s handling of the dossier is its use of the document to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant against Carter Page. In order to obtain a FISA warrant, the FBI must provide evidence to the FISC that the target of the surveillance is an agent of a foreign power. The FBI used the Steele Dossier as part of its evidence to obtain the FISA warrant against Page, but failed to disclose to the FISC that the dossier was funded by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign.

This failure to disclose the origins and potential bias of the dossier has been seen as a serious breach of FBI protocol and has raised concerns about the agency’s ability to remain impartial and unbiased in its investigations. Critics argue that the FBI’s reliance on the dossier to obtain the FISA warrant was politically motivated and was intended to undermine the Trump campaign.

In addition to its use in obtaining the FISA warrant against Page, the Steele Dossier was also used by the FBI as part of its broader investigation into the Trump campaign’s alleged ties to Russia. The dossier’s unverified allegations were leaked to the media and became the subject of intense speculation and scrutiny.

However, as more information has emerged about the dossier’s origins and credibility, questions have been raised about its accuracy and reliability. Some of the key allegations in the dossier, such as the claim that Trump had been compromised by Russian intelligence, have not been substantiated by independent investigations.

Moreover, the fact that the dossier was funded by the Clinton campaign has raised concerns about its potential bias and political motivations. Critics argue that the FBI’s reliance on the dossier to investigate the Trump campaign was politically motivated and designed to undermine Trump’s presidency.

The FBI’s handling of the Steele Dossier has also raised concerns about the agency’s transparency and accountability. The FBI has been criticized for failing to disclose the full extent of its use of the dossier to Congress and the American public, and for failing to fully investigate the origins and credibility of the document.

In response to these criticisms, the FBI has defended its handling of the dossier and its use in the broader investigation into the Trump campaign. The agency has argued that the dossier was just one part of a broader investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, and that it was only used in conjunction with other evidence to obtain the FISA warrant against Page.

The FBI has also argued that it did not rely solely on the dossier in its investigation, and that it has taken steps to ensure that its use of the document was appropriate and within the bounds of the law.

Despite these defenses, the FBI’s handling of the Steele Dossier has eroded public trust in the agency and raised concerns about its ability to remain impartial and unbiased in its investigations. Critics argue that the FBI’s use of the dossier was politically motivated and designed to undermine the Trump campaign, and that its failure to fully disclose the origins and credibility of the document has damaged its credibility and reputation.

In conclusion, the FBI’s handling of the Steele Dossier has been criticized on several fronts, including its use of the document to obtain a FISA warrant against Carter Page, its failure to fully disclose the origins and potential bias of the dossier to the FISC, and its potential political motivations for investigating the Trump campaign. This has raised serious concerns about the agency’s impartiality, transparency, and accountability.

Moving forward, it is crucial that the FBI takes steps to address these criticisms and rebuild public trust in its operations. This will require greater transparency and oversight in its investigations, as well as a commitment to upholding the principles of impartiality and justice. It will also require greater accountability for those within the agency who engage in unethical or inappropriate behavior, and a culture that encourages openness, honesty, and integrity.

Ultimately, the FBI must remain committed to its mission of protecting national security and upholding the rule of law, while avoiding the pitfalls of political bias and abuse of power. This will require a sustained effort to learn from past mistakes and improve the agency’s operations, as well as a willingness to be held accountable for its actions. Only then can the FBI regain the trust and confidence of the American people and fulfill its vital role in safeguarding national security and upholding the principles of democracy and justice.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Up Next

DANGER: What Happens When the People No Longer Believe in Their Government

Don't Miss

The Historical Corruption of the FBI and CIA

Elections

Lawfare, Coercion, and Intimidation at the U.S Department of Injustice

Th DOJ fraudulently claims this mission: “Uphold the rule of law, to keep our country safe, and to protect civil rights”

Published

5 days ago

September 18, 2023

Jeff Davidson

Lawfare is impacting society in horrendous ways, many of which ultimately impact your life and your experiences. What is lawfare? Derived from combining the words “law” and “warfare,” it is the employment of legal approaches to delegitimize, damage, or destroy an opposing party or to hinder their ability to employ their own legal rights.

While lawfare has been used among nations seeking to resolve military conflicts, hamper an opponent’s strategies and tactics, or accuse others of serious crimes, here I am only focusing on domestic issues.

The U.S. system of justice has become overtly contentious, straying from the original mission and objective of our legal system. Unfortunately, the U.S. Department of Justice adopted lawfare tactics en mass during the Obama Administration, under the sordid leadership of Attorney General Eric Holder.

Long Term Damage

Lawfare was employed against individuals whom the DOJ had targeted, to damage or disparage their character, waste their money and time, or triumph over them for public relations purposes. Today the DOJ persecutes, coerces, badgers, and prosecutes Americans, mainly conservatives, time after time.

The agency’s conviction rate is 93%, or 14 out of 15 cases. Yet, in countless instances, DOJ lawyers pursuing cases do not have sufficient evidence or even legal grounds. How do they prevail? Repeatedly, these government attorneys intimidate defendants to confess to “process” crimes, much like what the special prosecutors under Robert Mueller did with many of Donald Trump’s associates.

If no real crimes existed, DOJ attorneys, well-versed in lawfare, pushed for prosecution in one way or another, HUNDREDS of times. Conviction represents career bonus points for eager DOJ attorneys.

Garland: Corrupt Beyond Belief

Bill Barr, appointed by Donald Trump, was utterly corrupt – a swamp creature of the highest order. He sat on the Hunter Biden revelations. He ignored voluminous evidence of worldwide bribes taken by Joe Biden. He covered for Jeffrey Epstein’s clients, and likely lied about Epstein’s demise. He had insider knowledge of the numerous bogus plots against Trump and said and did nothing.

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, now head of the DOJ, has raised lawfare to justice-destroying heights. The DOJ has become the chief agency of injustice. Under Garland, Catholics, parents concerned about the education and welfare of their children, peaceful protesters, and legions of others have had their rights violated.

We know that both the FBI and DOJ have sought to lay heavy crap on Rudy Giuliani, Matt Gaetz, Don Trump, Jr., Jared Kushner, many of Trump’s advisors, and so many others.

Injustice on Demand

Garland’s DOJ implements lawfare in virtually everything it does. The agency has no qualms about incarcerating people for indeterminate lengths, staging show trials, bleeding defendants financially dry, and threatening them with jail sentences unless they capitulate. These are perilous times, especially for anyone who is opposed to the Biden Administration or speaks up in ways that the DOJ does not approve.

It is not difficult with the vast databases to undertake intense snooping and other nefarious methods. In record time, the “Department of Injustice” can ruin a person’s reputation, even after a lifetime of accuracy in their work, in their claims, and in how they comport themselves.

The DOJ can destroy reputations in less than 24 hours, particularly if that person is vulnerable with relatives or children. They raid homes with guns drawn when a simple knock on the door would suffice. The Democrats of today, can get to anyone they want, and will shake their targets to the core.

The GOP Must Win in 2024 or We’re Doomed

Everything described above should have no place within the U.S. Department of Justice. Lawfare should have no place. Meanwhile, the DOJ fraudulently claims that its mission is to “Uphold the rule of law, to keep our country safe, and to protect civil rights.” In actuality, it fails miserably on all three counts.

Claiming independence and impartiality, the agency states, “We work each day to earn the public’s trust by following the facts and the law wherever they may lead, without prejudice or improper influence.” Yes, Hunter Biden will verify that. The DOJ claims, “Our employees value differences in people and in ideas and treat everyone with fairness, dignity, and compassion.” Not exactly.

The only tenable solution to vanquish the runaway DOJ and their insidious practice of lawfare, intimidation, and coercion is for a Republican to win the 2024 presidential election, replace Garland, and quickly reverse the serious damage that has been done to our nation.

If Democrats successfully re-cheat their way to victory, may God help us all.

– – – – – –

Elections

DO YOU EVEN RECOGNIZE AMERICA TODAY?

Published

1 week ago

September 15, 2023

Terry L. Paulson, Ph.D., CSP, CPAE

Do you feel like you wake up every day to a bad dream and then struggle with the fact that your nightmare is actually reality in America today? Thankfully, the polls of Democrats and Republicans alike are sending a clear message—we’ve had enough of dementia Joe. He is often incoherent with or without his teleprompter. After speaking, he consistently wanders waiting to be guided to an exit. He tries to kiss and grope women who fall into his meandering web. Heaven help him if he would actually have to handle an open press conference with unscripted questions. The man seldom even works; he majors in rest and vacations.

And yet, somehow, Biden manages to keep making executive orders and decisions that move America further into “progressive” darkness. Obviously, somebody other than the President is managing the puppet strings and moving America faster and further into institutionalizing leftist policies.

Fearful of Biden facing Trump in the 2024 election, the Democrats have managed to tie up the leading Republican candidate with 91 indictments. Their hope is that the legal quagmire and trials will restrict his ability to mount an effective campaign. Be clear. The Democrats have one goal—keep Trump out of office and hopefully in jail.

Speaking of jail, where are the investigative reporters unraveling the crimes of “the Big Guy” Biden. We have recorded statements by Joe bragging about bribing Ukrainian leaders with US funds conditional on firing the Ukrainian district attorney looking into prosecuting Burisma. Vice President Joe Biden stopped the man whose investigation could have implicated his son, Hunter Biden. The Democrats keep claiming that Hunter’s problems have nothing to do with the President.

Unfortunately for Joe, in spite of such claims more and more evidence is mounting that the President and the Biden family benefited from Hunter’s influence peddling. Hunter Biden’s email to his daughter Naomi Biden that recently became public makes clear the father’s involvement. The email has been verified by the Washington Post and is clearly damning.

According to Hunter’s statement in that email, President Joe Biden demanded and received payment for his influence. It reads, “I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family for 30 years. It’s really hard. But don’t worry unlike Pop I won’t make you give me half your salary.”

This email and related information could have been made public two years ago. It could have impacted the 2020 election. If the House of Representatives initiates an impeachment inquiry, more of this information will be front and center and hard for the left-leaning media to avoid covering. With Joe Biden using aliases to send hundreds of additional incriminating emails, the evidence is just now coming to light.

If Biden is innocent of any wrongdoing, he should be cooperating and welcoming an investigation. Instead, he has already created a “war room” to be ready to fight any impeachment inquiry. Even with an inquiry, it’s unlikely that the Senate would have the votes to Impeach the President. But the more evidence that comes out, the more Democrats behind the scenes will likely be asking Biden to step down. Republicans did it with Nixon, and the Democrats would be wise to do it with Biden rather than risk him running again, losing, and taking their majority down with him.

The President’s future legal problems are not the only thing that is wreaking havoc on the American society. There is sexual confusion that is enraging many voters on the right and the left. In many states, biological men are claiming to be women and being allowed to compete in sporting events and winning against biological women. Politicians and even judges are refusing to define what a woman is. Most of us are pretty sure we know!

One meme that has been circulating makes the difference very clear. The world population is 8,030,610,062. People born from women: 8,030,610,062. People born from men: 0. They go on to suggest, “Feel free to fact check.” If men who call themselves women want to compete in sports, let them compete against other men instead of forcing their way into women’s locker rooms to live a lie.

In America today, they are not content limiting sexual confusion to adults. Many leftists are condoning trans surgery of young children to “change their sex” without parental approval. Schools can’t give an aspirin without parental approval, but in some states, children can decide to have irreversible surgery that mutilates their bodies. The parents are still responsible for caring for their children when they have to pick up the pieces from this child abuse.

Supporters call it “gender affirming care,” and it’s not all that rare. From 2016-2020, the American Medical Association reports 3,678 gender affirming surgeries done on children twelve to eighteen years of age. Columbia University has found that 3,315 children had breast surgery and 405 had genital surgery at a young age. This is not “care” of any kind! If anyone wants to do this to their body, wait until they are an adult and pay for it themselves.

If this is not enough, we have an administration claiming we have a secure border when millions continue to stream across our border in record numbers. Even sanctuary cities like New York have had enough. America takes pride in welcoming legal immigrants. It’s time to close down the flood of illegals.

Add to that the dismal performance in public schools around the country. Our kids are falling behind, and Democrats, coveting the support of teacher unions, refuse to even consider school choice. Minority parents want it, and Biden and his administration stand in the way.

It’s clear that America is hard to recognize as the country we once loved and cherished. It’s rapidly becoming a leftist loony bin in need of an intervention! Let’s hope that comes in November of 2024.