Here's What AI Says About the Steele Russian Dossier - You Will Be Pleasantly Surprised! ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Politics

Here’s What AI Says About the Steele Russian Dossier – You Will Be Pleasantly Surprised!

Moving forward, it is crucial that the FBI takes steps to address these criticisms and rebuild public trust in its operations.

Published

on

In recent years, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has faced criticism and scrutiny over its handling of the Steele Russian Dossier, a controversial document that purported to detail the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia during the 2016 election. The dossier was compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and contained salacious and unverified allegations that the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia to interfere in the election.

The FBI’s handling of the dossier has been criticized on several fronts, including its reliance on the document to obtain a surveillance warrant against former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page, and its failure to fully disclose the dossier’s origins and credibility to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).

One of the key criticisms of the FBI’s handling of the dossier is its use of the document to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant against Carter Page. In order to obtain a FISA warrant, the FBI must provide evidence to the FISC that the target of the surveillance is an agent of a foreign power. The FBI used the Steele Dossier as part of its evidence to obtain the FISA warrant against Page, but failed to disclose to the FISC that the dossier was funded by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign.

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: This is What Makes Jesus Cry

This failure to disclose the origins and potential bias of the dossier has been seen as a serious breach of FBI protocol and has raised concerns about the agency’s ability to remain impartial and unbiased in its investigations. Critics argue that the FBI’s reliance on the dossier to obtain the FISA warrant was politically motivated and was intended to undermine the Trump campaign.

In addition to its use in obtaining the FISA warrant against Page, the Steele Dossier was also used by the FBI as part of its broader investigation into the Trump campaign’s alleged ties to Russia. The dossier’s unverified allegations were leaked to the media and became the subject of intense speculation and scrutiny.

However, as more information has emerged about the dossier’s origins and credibility, questions have been raised about its accuracy and reliability. Some of the key allegations in the dossier, such as the claim that Trump had been compromised by Russian intelligence, have not been substantiated by independent investigations.

Moreover, the fact that the dossier was funded by the Clinton campaign has raised concerns about its potential bias and political motivations. Critics argue that the FBI’s reliance on the dossier to investigate the Trump campaign was politically motivated and designed to undermine Trump’s presidency.

The FBI’s handling of the Steele Dossier has also raised concerns about the agency’s transparency and accountability. The FBI has been criticized for failing to disclose the full extent of its use of the dossier to Congress and the American public, and for failing to fully investigate the origins and credibility of the document.

In response to these criticisms, the FBI has defended its handling of the dossier and its use in the broader investigation into the Trump campaign. The agency has argued that the dossier was just one part of a broader investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, and that it was only used in conjunction with other evidence to obtain the FISA warrant against Page.

The FBI has also argued that it did not rely solely on the dossier in its investigation, and that it has taken steps to ensure that its use of the document was appropriate and within the bounds of the law.

Despite these defenses, the FBI’s handling of the Steele Dossier has eroded public trust in the agency and raised concerns about its ability to remain impartial and unbiased in its investigations. Critics argue that the FBI’s use of the dossier was politically motivated and designed to undermine the Trump campaign, and that its failure to fully disclose the origins and credibility of the document has damaged its credibility and reputation.

In conclusion, the FBI’s handling of the Steele Dossier has been criticized on several fronts, including its use of the document to obtain a FISA warrant against Carter Page, its failure to fully disclose the origins and potential bias of the dossier to the FISC, and its potential political motivations for investigating the Trump campaign. This has raised serious concerns about the agency’s impartiality, transparency, and accountability.

Moving forward, it is crucial that the FBI takes steps to address these criticisms and rebuild public trust in its operations. This will require greater transparency and oversight in its investigations, as well as a commitment to upholding the principles of impartiality and justice. It will also require greater accountability for those within the agency who engage in unethical or inappropriate behavior, and a culture that encourages openness, honesty, and integrity.

Ultimately, the FBI must remain committed to its mission of protecting national security and upholding the rule of law, while avoiding the pitfalls of political bias and abuse of power. This will require a sustained effort to learn from past mistakes and improve the agency’s operations, as well as a willingness to be held accountable for its actions. Only then can the FBI regain the trust and confidence of the American people and fulfill its vital role in safeguarding national security and upholding the principles of democracy and justice.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.


Chris is the Founder of PolitiCrossing, one of the World's Top 50 Speakers and a member of the Motivational Speakers Hall of Fame. He considers it a privilege to be able to speak to people, help them lead successful lives, become extraordinary leaders and, masterful salespeople. Chris has authored twenty-three books with three million copies in print in 14 languages and over 450 articles on success, leadership, sales and motivation.



 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Elections

Election Fraud is Massive and On-Going in America

Across the U.S., the magnitude of voter fraud that occurs year after year, election after election, is staggering.

Published

on

Jay DeLancey is founder and president of the North Carolina Voter Integrity Project, and has much to say about voting in America:

Our system begs for transparency at all points along the election process. Who can vote, who did vote, how did they vote, and what was the tally? Today, unfortunately voter fraud is real and of enormous magnitude, as we saw in 2020 and 2022. Nowhere is this more evident than with absentee ballots.

Who, in any voting precinct, literally visits the homes of voters who filed absentee ballots to ensure that they are out of town? Even among those who have a legitimate quest to vote by absentee ballot, who can assure that their vote is counted properly and tallied accurately?

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: This is What Makes Jesus Cry

The absentee ballot initiative started as a viable effort to increase the ability of qualified citizens to vote, but has now become into a primary tool of manipulation. The more we can see, the fairer the elections are likely to be. The less we can see, the greater the likelihood that fraud will occur. Centralized absentee ballot collection is exactly the opposite of local voting in a precinct where there’s a chance that those with whom you register or vote alongside are your neighbors.

Ensuring the Rights of Qualified Voters

The local voting precinct is better positioned to spot perpetrators of voter fraud. Local poll workers on the scene are better able to assess if you are not the person you claim to be. They will tell you to leave, but by law that’s all they can do.

They can’t retain someone and hold them until authorities arrive, even in the case of blatant voter impersonation. Why? Because in the 1960s, to safeguard the voting capability of those who had been disenfranchised, laws were passed to reduce the incidence of intimidation, accusation, and retention.

Those times have long passed, and now we need ways of ensuring that qualified voters’ civil rights are upheld. Every time an unqualified voter is allowed to cast a vote, it demeans and diminishes the rights of all citizens. As such, voter fraud is the civil rights crisis of our time.

Fraud Occurs Year After Year

If you hear from anyone or from any group that voter fraud does not exist, or that it’s minimal and inconsequential, rest assured most of these proponents believe they are in the right. As long as you vote for their candidate, they’re content to ignore the magnitude, of voter fraud that actually occurs, year after year, election after election, across the U.S. They know they are ‘right,’ so why forsake their ironclad view that voter integrity groups are secretly voter suppression groups?

We’re always asked, how do you know that voter fraud exists? We have case histories, anecdotes, cross tabulated data, eyewitness testimony, and more. Voter fraud is real and rampant. Yet, we will routinely encounter some academic, usually from some law school, saying, “The science is settled on this. Voter fraud is a myth.”

Professors will proclaim from on high declaring that few people ever engage in voter fraud. Such professors are people of influence, they teach students, write papers, give lectures, attend symposiums, and spew authoritative misinformation. Cognizant or not, the damage that they do to society is ongoing and significant.

A Mortal Threat to Democracy

“The science was settled” in the early 1500s, that the sun rotated around the earth. Copernicus and other brave souls risked death to proclaim that earth was not the center of the universe as we knew it, or even our solar system.

We swim against the tide of what was launched in the 1960s but today has morphed into a mortal threat to democracy. The challenge we all face is to guarantee transparency in elections so that everyone can see the results and, more importantly, accept the results when their candidate does not win.

– – – – – –

 

Continue Reading

Elections

Overcome Leftist Propaganda: Conservative Documentaries and Extended Interviews

In ‘ultra-woke’ America finding media outlets and information vehicles that report the truth is challenge.

Published

on

Being middle-of-the-road or conservative in today’s insanely ‘woke’ America means having a hard time finding media outlets and information vehicles that report the truth. We are all far too familiar with the reality confronting us on a daily basis.

The high-tech online companies, corporate America, major newspapers, major TV networks, Hollywood, and a variety of otherwise so-called ‘journalists’ maintain an incredible, indefensible slant to the left. Many border on Marxism and outright Communism. They lie by omission, by twisting narratives, or by creating stories out of whole cloth which fit their pre-selected parallaxed narratives.

Precise, not Speculative

Here, for your edification, are 12 conservative documentaries and/or lengthy interviews. Notice the care and precision with which each has been produced, offering names, dates, facts, and figures with little or no hyperbole.

Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: This is What Makes Jesus Cry

  1. Selection Code, Election Rigging

2. The Creepy Line – Full Documentary on Social Media’s manipulation of society

3. What Is a Woman? Full Documentary 2022, by By Matt Walsh

4. What is a woman? – Matt Walsh LIVE on Campus (Facebook link)

5. Hillary’s America – The Secret History of the Democratic Party

6. Is Fake News a Myth? – Sharyl Attkisson

7. My Son Hunter, Full Movie (fiction, very close to fact)

8. Thomas Sowell on the Myths of Economic Inequality

9. Shoshana Zuboff on Surveillance Capitalism

10. The Rise of Surveillance Capitalism

11. Imposing Limits on the Woke? – Christopher Rufo

12. Climate Science: What Does it Say? – Dr. Richard Lindzen

One Fine Day

One day, may we all dwell in a society where journalism and news reporting represent some semblance of accuracy, fairness, clarity, and, need it be said, truth.

– – – – –

 

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Jesus, Master of Influence

Chris Widener, speaker and best selling author of The Art of Influence, teaches that Jesus is the master of influence. In sixteen sessions you will learn from one of the most influential communicators how the life and teachings of Jesus Christ is the best model for how to become an effective influence that can change people’s thoughts, beliefs and actions.

LEARN MORE

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending