George Soros is a Menace to the Free World ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

News

George Soros is a Menace to the Free World

Even after he dies, his maniacal heirs and managers will carry on.

Published

on

Whether it’s providing the funds to equip masses of illegal immigrants seeking to storm our southern border, fomenting riots to undermine national sovereignty, or sinking a nation’s currency to enrich himself, you can count on George Soros. He influences governments and impacts economies around the world to adopt extreme Leftist positions and to persecute those who don’t capitulate.

Through his many organizations, evidence has emerged that Soros is a micromanager,  manipulating politics on a state and even local basis. Last summer, a search warrant was executed, by a Soros-backed prosecutor in St. Louis, on a married couple seeking to defend their home.

Standing in the front yard of their house with a weapon, on June 29, 2020, the McCloskeys, fearful for their lives, lawfully defended themselves among trespassing protestors. Mark McCloskey notes that he and his wife, “Were threatened, their dog was threatened, and people stated that they would burn down his home and his office. Others said they would be living in that home by the time they were done.”

Intent on Wrecking the Nation

Two weeks later, on July 13, Open Society Foundations, the George Soros funded organization bent on diminishing the role of sovereign nations, bestowed $150 million in grants to black-led “justice organizations” to increase momentum “towards racial equality.” It also donated $70 million for “more immediate efforts to advance racial justice,” including campaigns to “reimagine” policing. Such funds are bestowed expressly to undermine law enforcement.

George Soros is behind much of the political and social turmoil that the U.S. and other nations are experiencing. By some accounts, 187 of his organizations were primed to undermine Donald Trump.

Soros foments dissension, daily if possible. He is a global puppet master extraordinaire who the Left downplays at every opportunity. Concurrently, if you mention his name, you’re accused of being paranoid.

Among history’s most conniving men, Soros conspires to influence who the presidents or chancellors of nations will be. He has bought many of the state Secretaries of State, including those in Michigan and Georgia, each of whom impeded meaningful inquiry into 2020 election irregularities at every turn.

As he did with Barack Obama, David Cameron, and Angela Merkel, and is now doing with Joe Biden, Soros dictates national and global doctrine. Manipulators on the right are bit players compared to Soros and his hundreds of far left funded agencies around the world.

A Menace Unlike Any Other

Illuminating the intricacies of the menacing Soros empire would require an entire encyclopedia. In the U.S., Soros funds the Alliance for Justice, widely known for its activism in the appointment of federal judges, and its consistent portrayal of Republican judicial nominees as “extremists.”

The coordinated attack and smear on Justice Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 was perpetrated by Soros funded groups. Online ads and subsequent blogger photographs allegedly show that Soros’ agents made direct cash payments, in unmarked envelopes, to hired protestors.

Another Soros group is the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), a pro-Castro organization and core member of the “open borders” lobby. CCR opposes nearly all U.S. post-9/11 anti-terrorism measures, claiming that American “injustice” provokes acts of international terrorism, as if 1400 years of Islamic fundamentalism plays no part.

Soros funds the Human Rights Watch, a group that criticizes the U.S. and Israel, opposes the death penalty in all cases, and seeks open borders and total amnesty for illegal aliens. And those are merely three of hundreds of U.S. groups that Soros lavishly funds.

We Alone Know What’s Best for You

He is now 90, but even after he dies, György Schwartz, originally from Budapest, in the then Kingdom of Hungary, his maniacal heirs and managers will carry on. Some say that they are worse than Soros.

Soros foot soldiers in government include Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice,, Bernie Sanders, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Ilhan Omar, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. In one way or another, all have been funded by Soros, who himself is linked with other “rule the world” billionaires such as Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey of Twitter, Eric Schmidt of Alphabet (Google), and Dan Schulman of PayPal.

These billionaires seek to ramp up mass immigration to the breaking point and dissolve cultures, in pursuit of a hopeless utopian, one-world, global government.  However, read Thomas More’s Utopia, Plato’s Republic, Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan, or other version of ‘ideal’ societies.

Such novel depicts nightmare scenarios (think, The Stepford Wives), replete with an all powerful central authority, restricted movement of citizens, serfdom, if not outright slavery, and all property  state-owned. Who presides over such ‘perfect’ societies? You guessed it: elite, ‘omniscient’ rulers who ‘know’ what’s best for everyone.

Undermining National Cultures

Globalists like Soros seek to undermine national cultures and replace them with a one-world currency and one-world government, with themselves and crony-corporate elites in control. As one radio host lamented, “I want to visit India and see Indian culture, not a McDonalds and Starbucks on every corner.”

A commentary in the international newspaper U.K. Mail offers perceptive: “Unfettered immigration doesn’t strengthen any country; it weakens it as it fragments into Balkanized enclaves. Everyone is demanding that his or her little piece of the pie is more important than the other people’s piece of the pie.”

Meanwhile, legal citizens of such nations are implored to yield and relinquish their rights. If they balk, they are called xenophobic or racist, or even Nazis. Lawful citizens are unceasingly pressured to accommodate immigrants, many of whom have zero intention of assimilating.

Serve Our Global Agenda

The Globalists reside in posh, gated enclaves, separate from the migrants which they require that everyone else host. Globalists don’t care what happens in your town.  High crime, school overcrowding, bursting budgets, jam-packed hospital emergency rooms, and 70% out-of-wedlock birth rates won’t impact them.

– – – – –

 

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.


Jeff Davidson is the world's only holder of the title "The Work-Life Balance Expert®" as awarded by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He is the premier thought leader on work-life balance, integration, and harmony. Jeff speaks to organizations that seek to enhance their overall productivity by improving the effectiveness of their people. He is the author of Breathing Space, Simpler Living, Dial it Down, and Everyday Project Management. Visit www.BreathingSpace.com for more information on Jeff's keynote speeches and seminars, including: Managing the Pace with Grace® * Achieving Work-Life Balance™ * Managing Information and Communication Overload®



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



News

Achievements Through the Ages

Marshaling resources, establishing order, and carefully scheduling activities and events are vital in any era

Published

on

Besides being regarded as the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, what do these sites have in common: the Great Pyramid at Giza, Egypt; the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, in what is now Iraq; the Statue of Zeus at Olympia, Greece; the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus, Turkey; the Mausoleum at Halicarnassus, in what is now Bodrum, Turkey; the Colossus of Rhodes in Greece; and the Lighthouse at Alexandria, Egypt?

Added to the above, what do the following sites, often referred to as the New Seven Wonders of the World, have in common? The Great Wall of China; Petra, an archaeological city in southern Jordan; the Colosseum in Rome, Italy; Chichen Itza in the Yucatán of Mexico; Machu Picchu in the Cuzco region of Peru; the Taj Mahal in Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India; and the Christ the Redeemer statue overlooking Rio de Janeiro, Brazil?

Last, what do these have in common: the Acropolis in Athens, Greece; the Suez Canal; the Panama Canal; the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, Turkey; Teotihuacan in the Basin of Mexico; the Empire State Building in New York City; the Eiffel Tower in Paris; the Porcelain Tower of Nanjing, China; El Mirador in Guatemala; the Tower of London; and many other notable places around the world?

Long Before Today’s Tools of Technology

The answer to all of the above, in a nutshell, is that they are major architectural, landscaping, or construction feats that were conceived, built, and perfected without the aid of a computer, software, or any of the technological tools that are commonly associated with project management.

The same can be said of the Great Canadian Railway, the Patagonia Highway in South America, the Hoover Dam in Arizona, the Itaipu Dam bordering Brazil and Paraguay, the U.S. Interstate Highway System, the Great Siege Tunnels of Gibraltar, the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, the Trans-Siberian Highway, the Aswan Dam in Egypt, the first passenger ocean liners, pre-World War II aircraft, early steel mills, etc.

Regarding the “Wonders” named above, to say it another way, long before anyone knew about electricity, let alone cyberspace or management software and spreadsheets, ambitious civilizations around the globe, pioneering builders, devised and constructed some of the most enduring, iconic sites and destinations in the world.

These massive projects involved conception (that is, the genesis of the idea), designing, planning, and material and labor considerations, all of which are part of today’s computer-aided world that obviously none of the builders and designers of these projects had at their disposal. As such, not all projects proceeded with the efficiency that today’s projects can muster. There were costly delays, high accident and mortality rates, and sometimes gargantuan setbacks. Despite it all, the march of civilization and the proliferation of monumental feats continued unabated.

Your Bottom Line

Whether it’s client services, team building, or what-have-you, what are their underlying concepts, and what makes their tenets viable now and for the future? You want to always seek both the short- and the long-term utility of a management methodology, a tool, a system, or even a set of beliefs.

With effective management, when you sweep away the contemporary hubbub, an underlying structure prevails. The need to marshal adequate resources, to establish order, and to carefully schedule activities and events, all remain vital in any era. Technological tools provide the contemporary template and operating systems by which we do proceed, while the underlying fundamentals of effective management are relatively constant.

When you stay open-minded to the available new terminology and tools, you’ll tend to learn new things and gain perspectives that you might not otherwise encounter. So, understand new terminology and tools, but do not be ensnared by them as if they are so vital that you can’t successfully manage a project without them.

– – – – –

 

Continue Reading

Education

Angry Parents Aren’t Terrorists—They’re Just Terrors to Public School Boards

Published

on

parents
Photo credit: Ryan Snaadt

Dear school boards: When you poke mama and papa bear, don’t be surprised when they growl and bare their teeth. And writing a letter to the president asking him to sic the FBI on parents rather than treating them as partners in education seems more political than needful.

To understand the gulf between parents and educators, just watch a school board meeting on youtube (if you still can). You’ll see concerned parents voicing their concerns at microphones. They look like defendants standing before judges in a tribunal. What happened to PTAs?

In school board meetings across the nation, parents are treated as opponents rather than partners. They’re frustrated and angry with imperious school boards who seem to insist that they know what’s best for their children.

At times their anger causes them to raise their voices in passionate speeches. They love their children and seek to protect them from what they view as indoctrination, not education. Parental love drives their passion and triggers their protective instincts. This doesn’t make them domestic terrorists.

If school board members and teachers feel threatened by genuine threats in public meetings or on social media, they should be investigated—by local authorities, not by the federal government.

Yet last week the National School Boards Association (NSBA) wrote a letter to President Biden asking him to direct the Justice Department to investigate angry parents for hate crimes and domestic terrorism. Domestic terrorism.

Why are parents so angry? Three issues come to mind: mask mandates, sex education that includes transgenderism, and Critical Race Theory.

Mask mandates

Masks can and do help prevent the transmission of the coronavirus. But they’re not necessarily a good option for children simply because, by and large, the virus is not deadly to kids.

In fact, 98-99 percent of children who get COVID fully recover. With this in mind, by doing a simple risk assessment of masking schoolchildren versus not masking them, we’d conclude that it’s better to let them learn without masks.

Additionally, we simply don’t know the longterm adverse effects forced masking has on learning. Most kids are visual learners and take cues from facial expressions. Their socialization may also suffer as a result.

Clearly, because educators are more at risk of death from COVID-19, they should continue masking. Thoughtful parents know their children who do not have preexisting conditions are generally safe to attend school without masks.

Why do school boards and teachers unions continue to push unnecessary and likely harmful mask mandates on children? For whom are they most concerned with protecting? If they believe in masking, they should mask up and suck it up. If they’re still afraid, perhaps they’re not cut out to be educators.

Sex re-education

Teaching children about the birds and the bees is a parent’s job, not a teacher’s. Sex ed is a family issue, not the state’s. Can’t it wait until just before puberty, rather than being taught to kids K-5?

Many traditional parents share this opinion. So is the self-evident truth that binary genders exist in human biology—and in reality. Parents who embrace this truth and passionately speak up about it are now at risk of being accused of hate speech.

We are born male or female. No amount of surgery or hormone treatment changes this reality. Parents know this and also know that confusing kids with fantasy genders and damaging gender reassignment harms them.

Public school educators have more than enough on their plates with teaching reading, writing and arithmetic. They should leave sex education to parents and resist pressure to push gender nonsense on impressionable children.

Parents are also concerned with the prospect of hormonally-altered boys competing against their girls in sports. This obviously gives males unfair physically advantages and presents a danger to the health of welfare of overmatched females.

The Journal of Medical Ethics affirmed this reality in a recent study in which the researchers concluded that “the advantage to transwomen afforded by the IOC guidelines is an intolerable unfairness.”

Bad theory

What is Critical Race Theory?

Critical Race Theory (CRT), as defined in a video by the Heritage Foundation, is a philosophy founded on Marxist analysis that claims America is “systemically racist.”

CRT proponents, active in colleges and universities for years, now seek to impact public policy in public schools. As a result, CRT is beginning to gain a foothold in K-12. This makes parents angry.

Most parents and some educators and school board members reject CRT’s racial discrimination for equity in favor of equality and opportunity for all— regardless of skin color.

The vast majority of thoughtful and caring parents believe that CRT teaches children to feel guilty for their “whiteness” while accepting the lie that America’s systems are inherently racist.

The 1964 Civil Rights Act dealt a mortal blow to systemic racism in America. Critical Race Theory ignores this landmark legislation and the fact that racism resides in people, not systems.

Obviously, there a differing definitions of systemic racism held by those on both sides of the issue. Just as there are differing definitions of “hate speech.” Perhaps it would be helpful to rely on definitions that are based in logic and common sense rather than emotion and agenda.

In the minds of many parents, Critical Race Theory is nothing more than partisan propaganda. CRT is harmful because it produces unmerited guilt, divides us and denies the attainability of the American Dream for people of color.

This is not borne out by our nation’s history. Rather, it’s debunked by generations of immigrants and people of color who came to America legally and made better and more prosperous lives for themselves and their families.

Terrorists or terrors?

To justify their appeal to the president for federal law enforcement support, the National School Boards Association is misapplying words and phrases to vilify angry and frustrated parents. Why? They’re either seeking to clear obstacles to their agenda and/or they mistake parental passion for peril to themselves.

Have some angry parents (or those who side with them) gone too far with social media attacks and threats? Probably. Does any of this have to do with genuine hate speech or domestic terrorism? Unlikely.

What’s more likely is that words like hate and terror are being misused to trigger more government interference in the lives of parents and their children.

Branding angry parents domestic terrorists is absurd hyperbole at best and political weaponization at worst. Parents who are merely resisting ideological intrusion into their public schools—and their children’s lives—deserve better.

What we need is an overhaul of a failing public school system and vouchers for charter schools and alternative educational systems like home schooling.

Why should we continue funding increasingly political public schools? Why should we believe school boards who claim parents are engaging in hate speech, threats of violence, and terrorism when most seek merely to protect their children by exercising their freedom of speech with passion and conviction?

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending

Politicrossing
 
Send this to a friend