Covidian Cult Initiates Human Sacrifice; No Mercy, No Bodily Integrity! - Politicrossing
Connect with us

News

Covidian Cult Initiates Human Sacrifice; No Mercy, No Bodily Integrity!

Published

on

The tragic case of Dereck Kovick being denied a liver transplant unless he receives a COVID 19 Vaccination is a demonstration of just how dangerous the Covidian Cult has become. A paramount characteristic of all cults is the disintegration of the individual in favor of an intangible and idealistic and utopian, yet never realized cause. In this case “100% vaccination.” Everything about the response to this entire pandemic has run counter to the very thing our nation was founded upon: individual rights.

In today’s world of failed schools and the masses all but begging to be turned into slaves, most don’t know or appreciate that we based the system of government in the United States on the concept of securing individual rights. The US Constitution is “the law of the land’ and it is important to examine and not ignore it in times of government overreach. We do not consider the preamble of the Constitution to be law. It is a set of principles that introduces us to the rest of the document.

Among those principles is a commitment to “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.” This is an important phrase in our Constitution because our Founding Fathers sought to create a government whose purpose was not to distribute individual rights, but to “secure” them. It is clear, not only in the preamble, but in other parts of the document, that the purpose of government is to protect our rights. Most of our founding fathers and the population they represented were properly distrustful of government power, having just experienced tyranny and a revolutionary war for hard fought independence. They rightfully saw government power as a monster and created our Constitution and its amendments as a chain to hold that monster at bay. It is this very thinking that led to the writing of the Bill of Rights. The title itself speaks volumes. “Bill of Rights” was not called “Granting of Rights” (for example) because it was recognized that our rights are given to us by our creator, not by a king or any other authoritarian body.

It is not a coincidence that the very First Amendment begins with the phrase “Congress shall make no law…” This clarifies that the Bill of Rights is intended as a restriction upon what the government may do. It doesn’t say “People can speak freely.” It says “Congress shall make no law…” This phrase sets the tone for the first 10 Amendments for a reason, the federal government exists solely to “secure the blessing of liberty.”

A private property owner or a private business has every right to require proof of vaccination if they so wish. Those unwilling to be vaccinated can choose not to work for or enter the establishment. They may end up finding a different employer or a different business to deal with. However, requiring vaccines as a condition of attending political events, public areas (such as the roads and airways), or religious services runs afoul of the 1st, 4th, and 14th Amendments. Further, it has long been common law that even the touching of one person by another without consent and without legal justification was a battery.

The Supreme Court in Union Pacific Railroad Co V. Botsford held that “no right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law.” This is known as “bodily integrity” and it is the requirement that informed consent is required for medical treatment. Even those in a vegetative state are granted bodily integrity. The US Supreme court has a history of ruling that the right of self-determination should not be lost merely because an individual cannot sense a violation of it, the court has held that incompetent individuals keep a right to refuse treatment. It has also held that such a right could be exercised by a surrogate decision maker. The common-law doctrine of informed consent is viewed as encompassing the right of a competent individual to refuse medical treatment.

Even prisoners have bodily integrity protections. In Washington V Harper, the Supreme court ruled that prisoners possess “a significant liberty interest in avoiding the unwanted administration of antipsychotic drugs under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Even in the left’s favorite Supreme Court ruling of all time, Roe V. Wade, it was argued that “a State’s interest in the protection of life falls short of justifying any plenary override of individual liberty claims . . . ” Is the left now so concerned with saving lives via vaccination and masks that they will disregard the language of Roe V Wade?

As I have written previously, with the authoritarian left’s well documented endorsement of people and policies that have led to so much death over the course history, it is ironic that they now seem concerned with preventing people from getting sick and dying from COVID-19. If they aren’t careful, they might get labeled “Pro-Life.” The only thing the left cares about, and ever will really care about, is power and control. Destroying the individual rights that our Constitution was designed to protect through scare tactics and a vaccine mandate is just their latest attempt at collectivist rule. And while the left’s collectivist dream of everyone being vaccinated is forced upon anyone and everyone regardless of their religious beliefs, or their individual health circumstances; innocent men like Dereck Kovick are offered up for sacrifice on the left’s latest altar of cultish intolerance.

Click here to support Dereck Kovick.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



News

OAN: American Freedom Tour coming to a town near you

American Freedom Tour President Chris Widener explains what inspired the American Freedom Tour, which debuts in Jacksonville, Florida from Oct. 7-8.

Published

on

In an interview with One America News Network (OAN) that aired just this week, American Freedom Tour President Chris Widener explains the inspiration and purpose behind the American Freedom Tour.

The event series debuts in Jacksonville, Florida from Oct. 7-8.

Headliners include Donald Trump Jr., Kayleigh McEnany, Dan Bongino, Dinesh D’Souza, Sheriff David Clarke, and Lt. Col. Waldo Waldman. All speakers will be live and in person at each venue.

“I look at the last five years, and conservatives have been told how bad they are,” Widener explains. “They’re deplorable, they’re racist, they’re sexist, xenophobic, transphobic. They’ve been beaten up for five years.”

“I thought,” Widener continued, “wouldn’t it be amazing if we did some rallies around the country, and got conservatives together, so that folks could look around and say, ‘I’m not alone.'”

So, who is Chris Widener, the president of the American Freedom Tour? Consider his thoughts on mask mandates:

“To me, the mask thing is just a way to show you who’s boss. It’s something so simple and so trite. And in reality, what does it really take to put a mask on? But that’s just such a surface level of looking at it. You have to ask, ‘Why would I have to put this mask on?’ And if they can get me to do something really simple like that, what else can they increase it and slowly but surely take away your rights?”

Watch the entire interview on Rumble, or here:

Additional American Freedom Tour events are scheduled in Ohio, Missouri, and North Carolina. Additional locations will be announced on AmericanFreedomTour.com as they become available.

For more information, and to purchase tickets, visit AmericanFreedomTour.com

Continue Reading

Business

Micro-tasking, not Multitasking, for Effective Performance

Professionals who can micro-task are in demand; multitaskers are doing themselves and their organizations a disservice.

Published

on

Much as been discussed about multitasking and fortunately, much of what has been written exposes the myth that multitasking represents. Instead of making us more productive and having a greater output, we tend to slow down on the very things that were trying to speed up on, and we end up making more errors.

Micro-tasking, by contrast, is the ability to compartmentalize and to focus in quick, short intervals on a variety of items that compete for attention — a vital skill for career professionals. Micro-tasking is effective for quick decisions, and for handling routine and short term tasks term nature. Multitasking is the attempt to handle two important tasks at the same time. It is not to be confused with micro-tasking.

A Skill to Cultivate

Some workers have little choice in the short run but to work in a distracting, noisy environment. Some employees, in particular, were retained to be able to quickly shift their attention from one issue to another, focusing on each issue as needed.

In an interruption-based environment, such as a hospital, police station, retail store, or airline ticket counter, the ability to micro-task is a valuable skill. Throughout the course of a day, a manager in such settings might encounter a variety of people asking questions and voicing concerns. For sale managers micro-tasking can make all the difference in making quota or not.

Tasks that require our sharp attention necessitate that we slow down, focus, keep interruptions at bay, and work as effectively as we can, toward completion. Handling two tasks simultaneously, each of which require sharp attention, is a prescription for poor results.

Be in Demand

Professionals who can micro-task are in demand. Others, who engage in multitasking, are doing themselves and their organizations, a disservice.

– – – – –

 

 

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending

Politicrossing
 
Send this to a friend