Careers of a Dubious Nature ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us


Careers of a Dubious Nature

Is a seemingly swift route to relative job security always a wise choice?



When thinking about careers in industries that exploit the masses – such as cigarette manufacturers or purveyors of violent entertainment – are those who pursue such careers are greedy or immoral. Does the belief that these paths are the swiftest routes to relative security drive such people?

A young man or woman who arrives at work at a tobacco firm, on the first day, is probably thankful to have a job and merely seeking to earn a living. Over the years, as some of these people progress through the ranks and eventually become top officers, their indoctrination has lasted so long that seemingly there is no other choice. This is the business they know. They have been immersed in their corporate culture for years or even decades. The rationalizations for doing what they do, however heinous, have been completely ingrained within them.

Denial of Reality

In another industry – the entertainment business – producers, directors, and screen writers of violent content perhaps spent the early years of their lives in less than favorable circumstances and are now reflecting back on their own childhood fantasies and fears. Or not.

Trending on Tucker: This is a coordinated attack on the family

Although more than 3,000 authenticated studies, on the topic of children and violent media, show a direct correlation between watching violence and taking part in violent acts, the purveyors of violent media are in heavy denial. Like big oil company executives who stealthily hire research fellows to publish reports citing no long-term damage to the environment, media industry magnates have their own methods of both conveying misinformation and engaging in disinformation campaigns.

As Malcolm Gladwell deftly points out in his book The Tipping Point, at some juncture, a tipping point occurs. When numerous high profile individuals fall prey to lung disease, a close relative of the president is hospitalized and eventually near death as a result of cigarette smoking, or some other development of a similar nature occurs, the tipping point will be reached and the tobacco industry will be seen and publicly and lastingly castigated for what it is – a purveyor of death.

Defacto Approval

If tobacco companies and violent media producers have enjoyed increasing revenues over the last several decades (nowadays selling in foreign markets), it’s because the growth has been allowed. Yet, throughout history, one bold messenger applying pressure at the right place at the right time can make a profound difference.

Ralph Nader testified against General Motors and wrote the book Unsafe At Any Speed, which essentially halted manufacture of the Corvair. He wielded more leverage than 10,000 protesters outside GM’s gates. Generations of drivers have no awareness that higher levels of highway safety are due largely to Nader’s efforts.

Impact through Innovation

The ads sponsored years back by were not the first of their kind, but they served as a benchmark. In one of these ads, a bespectacled man in his late 50’s, who appeared to have the status of a corporate spokesperson, came on the air during March Madness to announce that, until it could offer customers a completely safe cigarette, the tobacco industry was making a dramatic product recall.

The ad spokesperson said that customers’ trust and health was of paramount importance. The ad closed by announcing that it was an April Fool’s joke. It wasn’t paid for by the tobacco industry; it was paid for by an organization that seeks to create the tipping point that brings the tobacco industry to a state of ruin.

Tellingly, while movie producers, induced by lucrative product placement fees, continue to write cigarette smoking into the scripts of the pictures they produce, science fiction shows a more factual reality. In any of the Star Trek movies, the old TV series, or in futuristic Sci-Fi movies, do any of the characters smoke? No. Why?

No credible science fiction writer would portray a future where people of a presumably enlightened age would knowingly choose to directly inhale carcinogens as if there were no severe repercussions.

– – – – –


We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.

Jeff Davidson is the world's only holder of the title "The Work-Life Balance Expert®" as awarded by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He is the premier thought leader on work-life balance, integration, and harmony. Jeff speaks to organizations that seek to enhance their overall productivity by improving the effectiveness of their people. He is the author of Breathing Space, Simpler Living, Dial it Down, and Everyday Project Management. Visit for more information on Jeff's keynote speeches and seminars, including: Managing the Pace with Grace® * Achieving Work-Life Balance™ * Managing Information and Communication Overload®

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.


Delegation: An Ongoing Phenomena

Failure to delegate effectively often happens because team leader don’t trust the people with whom they’re working



For most of your career, you’ve read or heard that one of the key approaches to getting things done is to delegate effectively. This presumes that you have others to whom you can delegate. In my contact with more than 950 organizations over the last two and a half decades, I’ve found increasingly that people have fewer resources, a lower budget, and less staff people. If they want to get something done, often they have to do it themselves!

Assuming you have others to whom you can delegate, the first or second time you personally tackle a particular task yields useful information. You learn more about the nature of the task, how long it takes, and whether or not you enjoy doing it.

By the third time, a task of the same ilk as those you’ve handled before often becomes best handled by someone reporting to you. Such tasks could involve updating a database, completing an interim report, or assembling meeting notes.

Trending on Tucker: This is a coordinated attack on the family

All that You Can

On the path to getting things done, your quest is to identify all those things that you can possibly delegate to others and then prepare those others so that they have a high probability of succeeding. In the course of your workday there may be only a handful of things that you alone need to do because of your experience, insight or specialized knowledge. Everything else that can be delegated should be.

Some people feel they have to take care of everything themselves and to this day haven’t been able to break the habit of “doing it all.” If this someone is in your seat right now, recognize that as a category of one, you can only get so much done.

Many managers and supervisors fail to delegate effectively because either they don’t fully trust the people with whom they’re working, or they’ve always been get-it-all-done-by-myself types.

Take Time before You Assign

Prior to delegating anything to anyone, take the time to actually prepare your staff for delegation. This would involve assessing an employee’s skills, interests, and needs. You could even ask people what new tasks and responsibilities they would like to assume. You might be surprised at the wide variety of responses you receive. There may be people on your staff right now who can help you with tasks you’ve been dying to hand off to someone but didn’t see how or when you could put them into play.

While you want to delegate to staff people who show enthusiasm, initiative and interest, or have otherwise previously demonstrated the ability to handle and balance several tasks at once, sometimes you have to delegate to someone who has not exhibited any of the above. In that case, delegate on a piece-meal basis.

Ensure that the staff person is able to effectively handle the small task or tasks he’s been assigned and does not feel swamped or overloaded. When the staff person demonstrates competence, you can increase the complexity of assignments and even the frequency with which you delegate.

– – – – –




Continue Reading


Multi-tasking: More Harm than Good

In this day and age, where so much competes for our attention, it is easy to stray!



I belong to a local health club, and while I was there one day, I saw a woman get on the Stairmaster. I watched as she whipped out an mp3 player and started listening to music. Then, to my surprise, she reached into her gym bag, pulled out a book, and placed it on that ledge to read. I almost asked her if she would like a piece of gum!

Today, when so much competes for our attention, it is easy to stray! More often than we care to pretend, in the office and at home, we invite more than we can handle, and then act as though we didn’t. As individuals, throughout society, we are trained to believe that the ability to multi-task is a great attribute. Unfortunately, that’s a big mistake. Here’s why, and how to avoid multi-tasking in the future.

First Things First

What’s the fastest and easiest way to handle six tasks competing for our attention? Identify the most important task, second most important, third most important, and so on, then tackle the first and finish it all the way, move on to the second and complete it, then move all the way down the list.

Trending on Tucker: This is a coordinated attack on the family

Any other way of tackling those items, whether they are tasks for home or work, is simply not as efficient. The catch is, any other way is more psychologically satisfying.  Why?  It’s almost as if juggling projects, switching gears unnecessarily or abruptly, or leaving a job unfinished to start a new project gives you the opportunity to say to other people, “Hey, look at me! Look how involved I am! Look at how busy I am! I’m great at multi-tasking.” A multi-tasker, however, can’t compete with others who tackle their to-do list, one item at a time.

What about doubling up as a procedure for tackling a number of routine items or very simple tasks? You can eat dinner and read a book at the same time. Eating and reading at the same time is relatively harmless.

How about driving and talking on the cell phone at the same time? Driving requires your sharp attention, as does carrying on an intelligent conversation with someone else who is not present; doing both at the same time spreads your attention too thin, with often disastrous results. The same is true for projects you’re working on that require your best thinking.

* give yourself 5 to 10 minute intervals to focus on the task at hand
* safe-guard your immediate environment to avoid interruptions
* acknowledge yourself whenever you stick to one task and finish it
* repeat all the above, often, knowing that ‘more often’ is better!

Your Undivided Attention

When you’re working on a new task, brainstorming, engaging in first-time thinking, or doing creative work, it’s vital to offer your complete and undivided attention to that one task before you. To dissipate your attention or otherwise stray means you are not going to do your best work.

– – – – –



Continue Reading


Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.