American Taxpayers to Give $40 Billion to Ukraine ⋆ Politicrossing
Connect with us

Tucker Carlson

American Taxpayers to Give $40 Billion to Ukraine

Ukraine is the most important thing! Really? If you agree with that, you should not be sitting in the United States senate as a Republican.

Published

on

Tucker questions why a majority of Republican congressmen have joined democrats in voting for more military aid for Ukraine when our own country is rapidly running out of weapons to defend itself. Highlights include:

“Ukraine is the most important thing! Really? If you agree with that, you should not be sitting in the United States senate as a Republican.”

“And yet that’s their position. Of course, it’s Lindsey Graham’s position.”

“Let’s just take out Putin. Really? What would happen then? The country has 6,000 nuclear weapons. Would they be ‘unsecured’? You thought we had a mess on our hands when Saddam’s arsenals fell into the hands of lunatics and extremists. What would happen to those 6,000 nuclear weapons if we just ‘take out Putin’?”

“They don’t even think about it, they don’t care. They’re high on their own supply.”

“Since when are we fighting Russia? Well, since Putin stole the election from Hillary Clinton. Glad to see that Dan Crenshaw has signed up for this new campaign.”

“But you’ve got to wonder, at what cost? Not just the peril, the real peril that this could escalate into something crushing for the west, but what immediate cost to the United States and to our own ability to defend ourselves? All these people who ‘love the military,’ do they ever ask that question? Right now, Joe Biden and the US Congress have sent so much military aid to Ukraine that our country, the United States, is running out of weapons.”

“This is happening because senior leaders of the Republican party instantly bought the New York Times position on Ukraine, as they instantly bought the New York Times position on the BLM riots, as they instantly bought the position of the New York Times on the covid lockdowns. They didn’t question what they read, and the consequences, now we are short on weapons to defend our own country.”

“Now, no democrat goes against his own herd, ever. The first reaction of every democrat is always to read whatever talking points Nancy Pelosi provides. They never listen to the other side, they always go farther in one direction, and the Republican party is always led by people who join them.”

“Notice, they don’t answer. They just accuse the person asking the question of working for Putin. You’re against democracy. They don’t tell us how Ukraine is a democracy. They banned the opposition party — that’s a democracy? But, maybe there’s an answer. What is it? Stop name calling and answer the question.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

We'd love to hear your thoughts about this article. Please take a minute to share them in the comment section by clicking here. Or carry the conversation over on your favorite social network by clicking one of the share buttons below.



  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
 
 
 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.



Tucker Carlson

Tucker: There is something really wrong

The only way to stop these killings is to figure out why American society is producing so many violent young men

Published

on

Tucker looks at possible causes of the recent increase in violence in America and suggests getting to the root of the problem rather than continuing to ineffectively treat the symptoms.

“On May 14th, 18-year-old Peyton Gendron murdered ten shoppers in a grocery store in Buffalo, and then yesterday, 18-year-old Salvador Ramos killed 19 small children and two teachers in an elementary school in Texas.”

“Both Gendron and Ramos were very obviously mentally ill. The people around them new that. Both killers had told other people they planned to commit a mass shooting, and then they did. So, what can we learn from this? Well, the first, most obvious answer is that the system in place didn’t work. Gendron’s teacher sent him to a mental hospital for evaluation. They knew he was a threat. They tried their best, he committed a massacre anyway.”

“So, we know for a fact that what we’re doing isn’t working, but we should also be honest enough to acknowledge that it’s very hard to know what to do instead. The problem is that the human mind is much more complex and harder to control than we’d like to admit.”

“The only way to stop these killings is to figure out why American society is producing so many violent young men. There is a reason they’re acting this way. What is that reason? And it’s not just mass shooters, by the way, the ones you see on television. It’s gangbangers and carjackers and armed robbers and indiscriminate haters who push strangers in front of subway trains.”

“We have a lot of people like that in this country all of a sudden, more than you’d like to think about. Why are they acting this way? That’s the only question that matters. Of course, it’s the only question our leaders hate to address because there’s nothing in it for them.”

“This is bigger than a single mass shooting or even two of them in ten days. There has been a huge increase in violence in America, on our streets, on public transportation, in our schools. It’s not a guess, it’s measurable.”

“From January 1st to April 10th of this year, robberies in the New York transit system are up more than 70% year over year. Felony assaults in the subway have increased by 28%, grand larceny, according to the NYPD is up by more than 100%. Those are all crimes of violence, and that’s just underground. The same thing is happening on the streets.”

“It didn’t used to happen. It’s happening now — why? It’s not guns, it’s not the gun lobby. More Americans had guns at home than they do now, according to the Rand Corporation, which studied this. 45% of American homes had a gun in 1980. In 2016, that had dropped to 32%.”

“So, the problem is not that we’re more armed than we were. The problem is that people have changed. Young men have changed, they’re more violent. Why? That’s the bipartisan conversation we need to have now, and that conversation has been drowned out by lunatic attention-seekers who are hoping to win the next election. But we don’t need them now. Never mind your election. There’s something really wrong, and we can figure it out if we try. There are probably a lot of causes.”

“Well, is anyone studying what murderers, not just mass murderers but all murderers have in common? Instead of telling us about the gun lobby? Please, no one believes that. And why, by the way, is the answer to mass shootings always universal gun confiscation? Shouldn’t we be focused on the people who did it, on the dangerous people?”

“Let’s be serious about this. Children died. It’s real. Stop with the talking points, be honest.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

Continue Reading

Tucker Carlson

Tyrannical: The WHO’s New Global Pandemic Treaty

The Biden administration is very close to handing the World Health Organization power over every aspect of your life. Imagine the civil liberties abuses of the Covid lockdowns, but permanent.

Published

on

Do You Think It’s Alright? This Real Good Lookin’ Boy is talkin’ ’bout The WHO, and I don’t mean the band. Here’s hoping the US Won’t Get Fooled Again. Highlights include:

The Biden administration is very close to handing the World Health Organization power over every aspect, the intimate aspects, of your life. So, imagine the civil liberties abuses that you lived through during the covid lockdowns, but permanent, and administered from a foreign country. Here’s what we’re looking at tonight. This January, the Biden administration submitted a series of proposed amendments to something called ‘the International Health Regulations.’

Now, the Biden administration’s amendments, along with those from several other countries, will be combined to create a ‘new global pandemic treaty.’

That treaty is set to be adopted starting this weekend in Geneva at the World Health Assembly. Now, the full text of the treaty is not yet finished, but a WHO working group has summarized what it’s going to look like. The document begins by promising to restrict the WHO’s authority to just pandemics — calm down, it’s just pandemics.”

“Here’s the catch. the World Health Organization gets to define what a pandemic is, when a pandemic is in progress, and how long a pandemic lasts. Then you read the fine print and you realize the WHO will have total authority over emergency operations in the United States if there is ever a ‘public health emergency.'”

“What qualifies exactly as a public health emergency? Well, they don’t define that, but they get to. They get to decide what a ‘public health emergency’ is, and then they have total authority.”

“You can see where this is going. Now the Biden administration has made certain that unelected bureaucrats at the WHO have total authority to declare and define public health emergencies. The White House eliminated a provision that would’ve required the World Health Organization to ‘consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring in.’”

“So, as originally written, they couldn’t do anything without the permission of their member countries’ governments, but thanks to the change that the Biden administration pushed, effectively there is no limit at all on WHO’s power.”

“And it gets worse from there. The treaty also mandates a ‘whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach to pandemic preparedness.’ Every society is always ‘preparing for a pandemic’ and that means there will not be a moment ever when the WHO doesn’t have operational control so-called ‘public health matters’ in this country. Now, what’s that going to mean, exactly?”

“Every member country in the WHO must ‘inform WHO about the establishment of its national competent authority responsible for the overall implementation of the IHR that will be recognized and held accountable.’ Under this treaty, WHO members must enforce orders from the WHO, they have to act as the heavies for the WHO, and if they don’t, they’ll be sanctioned.”

Watch the video below and tell us what you think in the comments.

Continue Reading

 

Our Newsletter

Become a Politicrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Sites We Like

Our Newsletter

Become a PolitiCrossing insider: Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Trending